1 / 13

“Optimal Tariffs: the Evidence”

“Optimal Tariffs: the Evidence”. Broda, Limão and Weinstein American Economic Review 2008. Quotes. “a primary objective of trade policy is to protect special interests, rather than improve and/or maintain the terms of trade” (Krutilla 1991 p.139)

Download Presentation

“Optimal Tariffs: the Evidence”

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. “Optimal Tariffs: the Evidence” Broda, Limão and Weinstein American Economic Review 2008.

  2. Quotes “a primary objective of trade policy is to protect special interests, rather than improve and/or maintain the terms of trade” (Krutilla 1991 p.139) “small countries have very little ability to affect the world prices of either their imports or other exports, so that the terms-of-trade argument is of little practical importance” (Krugman and Obstfeld 1997, p. 226)

  3. This is (one of) first paper(s) to provide evidence that optimal tariff considerations do actually influence trade policy. tariff*=ω= where ω= is inverse of foreign export supply (X) elasticity. Grossman & Helpman (1995): (7) Calculate country specific estimates of export supply elasticities for 15 countries: Algeria, Belarus, Bolivia, China, Czech, Ecuador, Latvia, Lebanon, Lithuania, Oman, Paraguay, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Taiwan, Ukraine Data Tariffs: TRAINS (from UNCTAD) Trade: COMTRADE. 4-digit Harmonized System (HS) data

  4. Use calculated elasticities as indicator of “market power”: low market power (bottom tritile) vs medium/high mkt power (top two tritiles) • Test #1 for the relationship between market power and import tariffs. • Figure 3: cross-sectional regression plotting median tariff against median inverse export elasticity (at country level or a HS4 level?);

  5. Test #2: baseline model (13)τig=βif(ωig)+ηiG+xigγ +uig

  6. Use instrument for market power

  7. What if what’s really going on is that government uses tariffs to raise revenues, and market power measure is correlated with optimum-revenue-generating-tariff? Include (fitted) values of inverse import demand elastictity:

  8. Maybe it’s about politics? Use production data to calculate ratio of domestic production to imports. Then divide this by import demand elasticity and include the ratio as an independent variable. See columns 5 and 6 of Table 10.

  9. Is there something special about these countries? Look at US’ “statutory tariffs” Table 13

  10. Test whether relationship holds for NTBs

  11. Conclusions • Market power does impact tariffs when govt’s setting rates noncooperatively. • Market power doesn’t seem to influence tariffs when are set cooperatively. • Politics matters too, but not as much

More Related