controlled assessment
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
CONTROLLED ASSESSMENT

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 12

CONTROLLED ASSESSMENT - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 55 Views
  • Uploaded on

CONTROLLED ASSESSMENT. This was a very successful unit 2010 mean mark = 33.5 2011 mean mark = 35.7 Work was relevant and better focussed Much higher overall than examination performance on any unit. This meant higher grade boundaries were awarded for this unit. UMS conversion.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'CONTROLLED ASSESSMENT' - gerik


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
controlled assessment
CONTROLLED ASSESSMENT
  • This was a very successful unit

2010 mean mark = 33.5

2011 mean mark = 35.7

  • Work was relevant and better focussed
  • Much higher overall than examination performance on any unit.
  • This meant higher grade boundaries were awarded for this unit.
ums conversion
UMS conversion

* = 44 [45 UMS]

A = 40 [40 UMS]

B = 36 [35 UMS]

C = 32 [30 UMS]

D = 28 [25 UMS]

E = 22 [20 UMS]

F = 20 [15 UMS]

G = 16 [10 UMS]

website
Website
  • All relevant material is on this

www.wjec.co.uk

  • GCSE History and open all documents
  • Teacher guidance notes
general issues
General issues
  • Standard of work generally very good
  • Majority of work hand-written
  • Most work done in class over several sessions
  • Problems with non-attendees / senior management
  • Still much work was over-long
  • Not all centres used the marking checklist
part a
Part (a)
  • Main problem was with a set structure of introduction, isolated evaluation and conclusion
  • Suggested that candidates should be encouraged to integrate their source evaluation into the narrative of the historical events.
  • Quality of source evaluation varied with candidates often rewarded for irrelevant and incorrect comments.
part b
Part (b)
  • On the whole, this was done well
  • Candidates were showing that they understand what interpretations are and how different views are arrived at.
  • Some answers still need a stronger judgement
marking and annotation
Marking and annotation
  • Around 20% of centres had their raw marks adjusted in 2011. This was higher than normal as the moderating panel felt the need to get things right at the first go.
  • Recommended that the checklist is used in centres
  • Annotation within the body of the work does aid the moderation process
titles questions
Titles / questions
  • A new pair of exercises must be set for 2012
  • If the same exercises are submitted in consecutive years, the work will be returned to the centre and no marks awarded for the unit.
  • Forms are available for the next two year cycle, 2013-2014. Electronic versions should be sent to Greg Lewis for approval over the next six months. They are available on the website.
ofqual survey
OFQUAL SURVEY
  • The government standards watchdog, OFQUAL, has recently published a report on the introduction of controlled assessment.
  • The report can be found here

www.ofqual.gov.uk/news-and-announcements/130/750

ad