slide1
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Contents of Presentation

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 43

Contents of Presentation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 68 Views
  • Uploaded on

Situation of ATM in Europe Background Institutional set-up SES-Implementation and SESAME. Contents of Presentation. Situation of ATM in Europe. European airspace is fragmented according to national borders rather than traffic flows. More than 60 A rea C ontrol C entres in Europe in 2003.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Contents of Presentation' - geranium-virgil


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
contents of presentation
Situation of ATM in Europe

Background

Institutional set-up

SES-Implementation and SESAME

Contents of Presentation
slide3

Situation of ATM in Europe

European airspace is fragmented according to national borders rather than traffic flows.

More than 60 Area Control Centres in Europe in 2003.

slide4

Situation of ATM in Europe

Sectors and routes are designed according to national borders rather than traffic flows.

slide5

Situation of ATM in Europe

Traffic is still expected to grow, and even to double between 1997 and 2020.

slide6

Situation of ATM in Europe

Congestion leads to sub optimal trajectories.

slide7

Situation of ATM in Europe

The busiest routes have to avoid military areas.

slide8

Situation of ATM in Europe

Military areas are located in the core area of Europe.

slide9

Background

  • The European Commission, Vice President Ms de Palacio, launched the initiative in 1999.
  • Main principles:
    • Reduce fragmentation between:
      • the airspace of Member States,
      • civil and military providers and users,
      • systems
    • Introduce new technology
    • Create synergy EU – Eurocontrol
slide10

Background

20 April 2004: Entry into forceof 4 Regulations of the European Parliament and the Council:

  • No 549/2004:Framework
  • No 550/2004:Service Provision
  • No 551/2004:Airspace
  • No 552/2004:Interoperability

Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union in

edition L 96 of 31 March 2004, see:

http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/archive/2004/l_09620040331en.html

which opportunities
Better co-operation between ANSPs, regulators, civil and military providers;

Improved relations between airspace users and service providers;

Improve safety, performance and efficiency levels;

Create required future capacity at reasonable costs;

Share airspace as a common resource disregarding national boundaries.

Which opportunities ?
institutional set up
Single Sky Committee (SSC)

Industry Consultation Body (ICB)

Co-operation with Eurocontrol

Institutional Set-up
slide13

Single Sky Committee

  • The Single Sky Committee assists the Commission
    • 2 representatives per Member State (civil & military representation)
    • Observers: Eurocontrol, European countries with aviation agreements (CH, NO, IS)
    • chaired by the Commission
  • Decision making process:
    • consultative (simple majority of MS)
    • regulatory (qualified majority of MS, 2/3 of weighted votes)
slide14

SingleSky Committee (II)

  • Functions of the Committee:
    • Provide opinion on draft Commission implementing

rules (regulations/directives/decisions)

    • Provide opinion on draft mandates to Eurocontrol
    • Policy guidance (SESAME)
    • (if needed) coordination of Community position within Eurocontrol
    • (in the future) address problems in connection with FABs

10 meetings so far, the next one on 22 September 2005

slide15

Industry Consultation Body (II)

Established by SES-regulation in order to provide Commission with advice by all stakeholders. Members:

4 ATSP (CANSO)

4 Manufacturing Industry (ASD formerly AECMA)

2 Airports (ACI)

5 Professional staff associations (Joint ATM Working Group (4), ECA/IFALPA (1))

8 Airspace Users (IATA, AEA (2), IACA, ERA, ELFAA, EBAA, IAOPA)

2 CNS Service Providers (COM (1), NAV (1))

1 Meteorological Service Providers (Aviation Meteorology Group)

slide16

Industry Consultation Body

Observers:

1 Eurocontrol

2 Non-European Interests (FAA and AIA)

1 Military (CMIC)

1 Research Establishments (EATRADA)

6 meetings so far, next meeting in October 2005

Current subjects of interest: SESAME, interoperability, new mandates

ICB expresses expectations on new technology, timetable, priorities, orientation for research

slide17

Eurocontrol

The European Community has become a member of Eurocontrol besides the (presently 22) MS,

relations with Eurocontrol are area of shared national and

Community competence.

Memorandum of Cooperation of December 2003

between the European Commission and Eurocontrol organises cooperation in the domain of Single Sky,

Research, Statistics and GNSS

Through mandates Eurocontrol contributes to the implemen-tation of the Single Sky.

slide18

Mandates to Eurocontrol

  • Charging regime
  • Airspace design
  • Flexible use of airspace
  • Functional airspace blocks: report
  • Interoperability
  • AFTM, EUIR, AIP
  • Performance Review
  • Target level of safety
implementation
European upper information region (EUIR)

Functional airspace blocks (FAB)

Flexible use of airspace (FUA)

National Supervisory Authorities (NSA)/Designation

(certification ANSP)

ATCO-licence

Interoperability

SESAME

Extension to 3rd countries

Implementation
slide20

Reorganisation of the Airspace - EUIR

  • Establishment of an European Upper Information Region (EUIR) by merging all UIRs controlled by European Member States above FL 285 and within the EUR and AFI ICAO regions.
  • Shall be negotiated and agreed within ICAO.
  • Possibility to extend to airspace outside the EUR and AFI ICAO regions (choice of MS).
slide22

Reorganisation of the Airspace - FAB

  • Establishment of Functional Airspace Blocks (FAB) in the upper (and possibly lower) airspace.
  • Objectives:
    • Reduce fragmentation,
    • Take into account traffic flows and not national borders,
    • Increase co-operation,
    • Increase harmonisation,
    • Provide efficiency gains.
slide23
MS to develop FABs according to 7 criteria:

safety case;

optimum use of airspace, taking into account air traffic flows;

overall added value, including optimal use of technical and human resources, on the basis of cost-benefit analyses;

ensure a fluent and flexible transfer of responsibility for ATC;

ensure compatibility between upper and lower airspace;

comply with regional agreements concluded within ICAO;

respect regional agreements, in particular those involving European third countries.

Reorganisation of the Airspace - FAB

slide24

Reorganisation of the Airspace - FAB

  • Bottom-up approach:
    • MS are fully responsible to initiate and set-up FABs,
    • FABs can include all or parts of a State’s Airspace,
    • For multinational FABs, all States involved must agree on the respective FAB,
  • No single “blueprint” for FABs, we expect different models to be implemented.
  • But, these FABs shall meet the 7 general criteria of the regulation.
slide25

Reorganisation of the Airspace - FAB

  • Based on the experience of States/ANSPs when setting up FABs, the Commission will develop binding general principles for establishment and modification of FABs;
  • The extension of FABs to lower airspace (below FL 285) will be studied by the Commission before the end of 2006;
  • The Commission will review the functioning of the bottom-up approach by early 2009 and propose additional measures, if necessary.
slide26

Reorganisation of the Airspace - FUA

  • Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA):
    • Support civil/military co-operation within FABs and between different FABs,
    • Establishes mandatory rules and criteria for application of FUA,
    • Harmonizes conditions of access and freedom of movement within the airspace.
    • Civil/military coordination in airspace management and air traffic management.
    • Regional/cross-border application of FUA.
slide27

NSA

  • Establishment or nomination of National Supervisory Authorities since 20 April 2004.
  • Requirements:
    • (At least) functional separation from ANSP.
    • Impartiality and transparency
    • Capabilities:
      • Technical expertise,
      • Sufficient manpower,
      • Sufficient financial resources.
slide28

NSA

  • NSA need to co-operate. They can be established at regional level.
  • Tasks:
    • Certification of ANSPs,
    • Compliance monitoring,
    • (poss.) role in designation process
    • safeguarding role re declarations of conformity/suitability/verification under interoperability

regulation .

  • Future: which role for EASA?
slide29

Interoperability

  • Objective and scope:
    • Interoperability between the different systems, their constituents and associated procedures of the European ATM network,
    • Coordinated introduction of new agreed and validated concepts of operations or technology.
  • Three different tools:
    • Essential requirements.
    • Implementing rules.
    • Community specifications.
slide30

Interoperability

  • Essential requirements:
    • Seamless operation,
    • Safety,
    • Civil-military coordination,
    • Support of new concepts of operation,
    • Environmental constraints,
    • Principles governing the logical architecture,
    • Principles governing the construction of systems.

Essential requirements are compulsory

(Annex II of interoperability regulation).

slide31

Interoperability

  • Implementing rules:
    • Shall determine any specific requirement that complements or refine the Essential Requirements,
    • Shall also describe the coordinated introduction of new, agreed and validated concepts of operation or technology.

Implementing rules are compulsory

(prepared by Eurocontrol and adopted by EU-Commission).

slide32

Interoperability

  • Community specifications are means of compliance

European Standards

(drawn up by CEN/CENELEC/ETSI in cooperation with EUROCAE)

or

Eurocontrol specification(for operational coordination)

(Systems, procedures and constituents which meet

Community specifications are presumed compliant with

mandatory rules)

slide33

SESAME

SESAME is the Single European Sky Implementation Programme to modernise ATC infrastructure. Synchronises the implementation of new equipment in the EU by ensuring that airborne equipment is consistent with ground technology. Initialised by ATM equipment manufacturers, it is now supported by the whole air transport community.

slide34

Why SESAME?

Traffic will more than double by 2025!

ATM is still using ageing technology from 70s, even 50s with virtually no automation at all

Possible with current operating principles?

?

sesame
Turn off the fragmented ATM approach

Synchronise and integrate plans from research to operations

Combine technical/operational solutions with the institutional/ regulatory/ financial instruments of the European Commission

SESAME will plan, research, develop, implement

SESAME
sesame1
Two main phases:

Definition Phase (2005-2007)

Deliver a European ATM Master Plan for 2007-2020

Implementation Phase (2007-2020)

Development and deployment of new generation ATM systems

Incremental approach, phased in 3 « packages »

SESAME
slide37

SESAME – Definition phase

  • Definition phase launched, will run up to 2007
  • Run under Eurocontrol’s operational responsibility
  • Deliverable: ATM Master Plan for 2020, which will define a common goal and vision for the development of the European air traffic control infrastructure
slide38

Industrialisation

Deployment

Deployment

Foundation

  • Innovative R&D Applied R&D Industrialisation

Deployment

Applied R&D Industrialisation

Applied R&D Industrialisation

Applied R&D Industrialisation

Applied R&D Industrialisation

Applied R&D Industrialisation

Deployment

Deployment

Deployment

Deployment

Applied R&D Industrialisation

SES Deployment

Collaborative – High Performance ATM

SESAME – Implementation phase

2005

2010

2015

2020

Definition

Phase

2005

2010

2015

2020

Accompanying technical/operational solutions with regulatory instruments

slide39

Proposed Governance Structure

  • The Commission proposes to set up a Joint Undertaking:
  • Separate legal entity
  • Community and other parties (public and private) can be members
  • Eurocontrol is proposed to be a founding member, together with the Community
  • Oversight by Member States through the Single Sky Committee
slide40

SINGLE SKY COMMITTEE

SINGLE SKY COMMITTEE

ADMINISTRATIVE BOARD

ADMINISTRATIVE BOARD

CONSEIL D

CONSEIL D

ADMINISTRATION

ADMINISTRATION

Usagers

Usagers

(4)

(4)

(4)

Users

Users

Services NA (3)

Services NA (3)

ANSPs

ANSPs

(3)

Community

Communaut

Communaut

Community

é

é

Eurocontrol

Eurocontrol

Eurocontrol

Eurocontrol

Autre

Other Members

Autre

Other Members

Membre

Membre

)

)

)

(10)

(10)

(10)

(10

(10

(10

A

A

é

é

Airports

roports

Airports

roports

(2)

(2)

(2)

Manuf

Manuf

.

.

Ind

Ind

Equipement

Equipement

(1)

(1)

(1)

EASA, MILITARY, STAFF

EASA, MILITARY, STAFF

Administrative board

Taking into account conclusions from the SDG study

Mapping industry representation on Definition Phase

slide41

Tasks and responsibilities

  • The SESAME JU will be the ‘owner’ of the ATM Master plan:
  • Organise Research & Validation activities, and complementary technical studies
  • Common components (paper, soft or hardware) definition and/or procurement activities, as defined in the ATM Master Plan
  • JU will be a light structure and rely on external technical resources
    • Eurocontrol
    • Other members
    • Specific technical working groups
slide42

Funding

  • An estimated 300 M€ p.a. are foreseen (to be confirmed and detailed in the definition phase):
  • R&D Framework programmes
  • Industry funding
  • TEN-T funding
  • Eurocontrol funding
  • Route charges under Common Projects charging scheme
  • ANSPs
  • Third country members
  • Funding can also be ‘in kind’
slide43

Relations with third countries

  • The full potential of the SES (“seamless operation”) will only be reached by enlarging its scope
  • “The Community shall aim at and support the extension of the SES to countries which are not members of the EU. To that end, it shall endeavour, either within the framework of agreements concluded with neighbouring third countries, or within the context of Eurocontrol, to extend the scope of this Regulation to those countries”.

(Article 7 of the Framework regulation)

ad