1 / 40

Learners in Difficulty: The “Problem” Student

Learners in Difficulty: The “Problem” Student. Joseph O. Lopreiato MD, MPH Associate Dean for Simulation Education Professor of Pediatrics. Acknowledgment. Outline. Definition. Learner /School Dilemma. Conflicts: Student advocate role Societal and professional obligations

Download Presentation

Learners in Difficulty: The “Problem” Student

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Learners in Difficulty:The “Problem” Student Joseph O. Lopreiato MD, MPH Associate Dean for Simulation Education Professor of Pediatrics

  2. Acknowledgment

  3. Outline

  4. Definition

  5. Learner /School Dilemma • Conflicts: • Student advocate role • Societal and professional obligations • Institutional loyalty • Tendencies: • Minimization and temporization • Second chances • Will get better if you work harder • Difficulty in providing negative evaluation (clinical)

  6. USUHS Pre-clinical: Magnitude

  7. USUHS clinical: Magnitude

  8. Approach to evaluation

  9. Symptoms: Potential Problem Noted

  10. Symptoms: in Clinical Arena Yao and Wright, 2000

  11. HPI/PMHx

  12. Differential Diagnoses

  13. Differential Diagnoses Lucey Reference ########

  14. Deprivation

  15. Distractions

  16. Depression and Anxiety Liselotte N. Academic Med 2006;81:354-373

  17. Dependence

  18. Disorders

  19. Disease

  20. Artino & Bandura • Choice of activities; effort; persistence * Self-Efficacy

  21. Motivation Rhoads, J of Med Ed 1974

  22. Approach to evaluation

  23. References • Artino, A. R., Jr. (2012). Academic self-efficacy: from educational theory to instructional practice. Perspect Med Educ, 1(2), 76-85. doi: 10.1007/s40037-012-0012-5 • Croen, L. G., Woesner, M., Herman, M., & Reichgott, M. (1997). A longitudinal study of substance use and abuse in a single class of medical students. [Comparative Study]. Acad Med, 72(5), 376-381. • Dyrbye, L. N., Thomas, M. R., & Shanafelt, T. D. (2006). Systematic review of depression, anxiety, and other indicators of psychological distress among U.S. and Canadian medical students. [Review]. Acad Med, 81(4), 354-373. • Ghodasara, S. L., Davidson, M. A., Reich, M. S., Savoie, C. V., & Rodgers, S. M. (2011). Assessing student mental health at the Vanderbilt University School of Medicine. Acad Med, 86(1), 116-121. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ffb056 • Holmboe. (2008). Practical guide to the evaulation of clinical competence. 1st ed. • [edited by] Eric S. Holmboe, Richard E. Hawkins. Mosby/Elsevier in Philadelphia, PA . • Ishak, W., Nikravesh, R., Lederer, S., Perry, R., Ogunyemi, D., & Bernstein, C. (2013). Burnout in medical students: a systematic review. Clin Teach, 10(4), 242-245. doi: 10.1111/tct.12014 • Rhoads, J. M., Gallemore, J. L., Jr., Gianturco, D. T., & Osterhout, S. (1974). Motivation, medical school admissions, and student performance. [Comparative Study]. J Med Educ, 49(12), 1119-1127. • Rosebraugh, C. J. (2000). Learning disabilities and medical schools. Med Educ, 34(12), 994-1000. • Yao, D. C., & Wright, S. M. (2000). National survey of internal medicine residency program directors regarding problem residents. JAMA, 284(9), 1099-1104.

  24. Learners in Difficulty:Therapeutic Considerations CAPT Barbara Knollmann-Ritschel Fundamentals Module Co-Directors Associate Professor for Pathology and Emerging Infectious Diseases

  25. Objectives • Identify challenges in an ongoing curriculum. • Discuss differences of short and long term remediation. • Present a strategy for learners with issues in Professionalism, Science, and Clinical Skills. • Discuss the cost of remediation.

  26. Remediation: Challenges in new Curriculum • Old Curriculum: • Courses Directors • Long time span with regular contact • Ongoing remediation: course specific help • Failed Course: repeat course/deceleration

  27. New Curriculum: New Challenges • Modules Directors: organize remediation for multiple courses with Course Directors • Ongoing curriculum- bigger impact when students are at lower end- need to juggle more courses at the same time • Less time for students with denser curriculum: • The fire hose

  28. Remediation: Challenges in new Curriculum • Remediation is spaced with ongoing curriculum- • Student fails Fundamentals- final remediation may not be done until following summer! • Remediation may be 10 months later with ongoing curriculum

  29. Remediation: Challenges in new Curriculum • Timing is not ideal- what can we do? • “Pre grade remediation” – what can we do not in the short term before the end of the module or ongoing remediation • Balance with in-depth remediation

  30. Are they the same? Remediation of Science Knowledge vs. Clinical Skills vs. Professionalism

  31. Creating a Remediation Plan

  32. Remediation of Science Knowledge: • Summary of exam results with strengths and weaknesses • Pre-remediation work summary • Reason for requiring additional work • Grade issued: Incomplete/Fail • Plan: • What type of remediation is needed and proposed study block. • A Passing score (above 65%) will be required to pass the Fundamental Module.

  33. Remediation of Clinical Skills • Review data from direct observations and Simcenter • Where is the Lesion? • Professionalism • Reporter • Interpreter • Manager • Educator • Increased time at simulation center- Practice skills – residents FNA • Remediate skills session as close to time of feedback • Focused plan on those skills that are identified as weak

  34. Remediation of Professionalism: Five-Step Approach • Major concern from AAMC

  35. Tiered Approach: 5 Step Process

  36. Cost Student 2

  37. Acknowledgements

More Related