1 / 28

Privatized Cigarette Enterprises and Public Health

Privatized Cigarette Enterprises and Public Health. By Ayda A. Yurekli, Ph.D World Bank. Meeting of Mediterranean Countries, Malta, September 2001. The Objectives. To examine the privatization of cigarette enterprises from public health perspective

Download Presentation

Privatized Cigarette Enterprises and Public Health

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Privatized Cigarette Enterprises and Public Health By Ayda A. Yurekli, Ph.D World Bank Meeting of Mediterranean Countries, Malta, September 2001

  2. The Objectives • To examine the privatization of cigarette enterprises from public health perspective • Why were state-enterprises established, why privatize • What are the expected benefits of privatization • Why these benefits may undermine Public Health • Are Public Health concerns valid? • Do private enterprises operate efficiently? • Do they have higher productivity? • Do production and consumption increase? • Does privatization reduce the consumer price? • To discuss the Pros and Cons of Privatization

  3. Reasons for State Enterprises • increase government revenues and control prices • insufficient or lack of private investment • control economy and be self reliant; • protect national security.

  4. Why Privatize State Enterprises? • Became burden on the government budget and slowed down economic growth. • Overstaffed • Paid excessive wages and benefits to employees • Lacked autonomy and poor incentives to managers • Operated inefficiently and unproductively • Had old and inefficient technology • Higher corruption and • Produced low quality products • Emerging Capital Markets (i) Increasing private and foreign investment

  5. Structural Reforms • To reinforce macroeconomic policies • To promote efficiency • To reduce macroeconomic imbalances • Privatization • Reform tax system and administration • Financial and trade liberalization

  6. Sectoral Distribution of Privatization by Region, 1988-1993 Source : Sader 1995, LAC : Latin America, ECA, East and Central Asia, EAP : East Asia and Pacific, SA : South Asia; Africa : Sub-Saharan Africa, MENA: North America and Middle East

  7. Private Investment in Cigarette Production in Ukraine and Turkey, 1990s Source: USDA, World Tobacco Files, Kravosky, 2000

  8. Expected Benefits and Outcome of Privatization EXPECTED BENEFITS LEADS TO EXPECTED OUTCOME Efficiency and Productivity Lower Prices Higher Quality More Variety • Increased • - Consumption • - Users • - Accessibility • - Affordability

  9. How does Privatization of Cigarette Enterprises affect Public Health ? EXPECTED OUTCOME TO PUBLIC HEALTH • Increased • - Consumption • - Users • - Accessibility • - Affordability • Increasing deaths and disease • Increasing health care costs • Increasing burden on • smokers • non-smokers • families • society • economy

  10. Do Private Enterprises Operate Efficiently?Higher Labor Productivity

  11. Do Private Enterprises Operate Efficiently?Higher Labor Productivity

  12. Increasing Labor Productivity: What consequences for employment ? TBT:Food Beverages and Tobacco Manufacturing: Source: Kasnakoglu, Cakmak 2000, Onder 2001

  13. Labor Adjustment Prior to Privatization in Turkey

  14. Labor Adjustment:Post Privatization,State Cigarette Enterprises in Ukraine

  15. Efficiency: Why adjust wages after privatization?

  16. Efficiency: Why adjust wages after privatization?

  17. Privatization and Production:Is production higher after privatization?

  18. Privatization and Production:Is production higher after privatization?

  19. Would privatization increase consumption?

  20. Does privatization increase consumption?

  21. Do prices increase or decrease after privatization?

  22. Operating Environment:Monopolistic Competition: Follow the leader Private Production

  23. Why doesn’t an efficiency gain reduce prices?Price Control: Below Market Rate Prices

  24. How can prices be lower than costs? Subsidies • TEKEL has been incurring loses and owes USD 100 million to international tobacco enterprises. • TEKEL receives high subsidies from the government budget.

  25. Impact of SubsidiesWho gains, who loses? • Government finances its subsidies from government tax revenues and also internal and external borrowing. • Government subsidies create a substantial burden on government budget in Turkey • Government increases prices of state enterprise products to finance loss-making enterprises. • As a result, consumers face higher prices. In the long run, consumers and society lose.

  26. Will consumer prices decrease after privatization?Depends on pre-privatization environment. • If the industry is heavily subsidized- NO • If the government controls the price with soft budget- NO • If the current prices are below the market rate- NO

  27. Pros and Cons of Privatization Pros • Increases foreign investment • Increases government revenues • Funds can be reallocated to other good uses • No conflict of interest for government (increasing cigarette production and reducing demand) • In the short run, price may increase • Products meet consumer’s taste and demand Cons • Reduced employment (maybe) • Lower salaries and benefits (maybe) • Worse working conditions • Aggressive marketing, promotion may raise consumption

  28. Solution:Negative effects ofprivatization on public health minimized if : • Regulatory tobacco control framework is set to protect consumers • Government controls tobacco epidemic through tax policies • No pre-tax adjustment discussion with the private enterprises

More Related