safeguarding adults and the nhs
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Safeguarding Adults and the NHS

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 22

Safeguarding Adults and the NHS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 104 Views
  • Uploaded on

Safeguarding Adults and the NHS. Sylvia Manson. Introduction – Review of No Secrets. Our society is redefining how we enable adults to be safe from harm and abuse. No Secrets is being reviewed to provide a framework and principles that can guide local practice

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Safeguarding Adults and the NHS' - george-wiley


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
introduction review of no secrets
Introduction – Review of No Secrets
  • Our society is redefining how we enable adults to be safe from harm and abuse.
  • No Secrets is being reviewed to provide a framework and principles that can guide local practice
  • The NHS have a key role in safeguarding adults
drivers for change
Drivers for Change

Safeguarding Adults Vision

Safeguarding Adults Principles

No Secrets 2

Specific Guidance

primary driver 1 government policy
Primary Driver 1- Government Policy

Shift power from state to local communities and individuals

Big Society – greater involvement of voluntary agencies and communities;

Maximise autonomy - limited state intervention

Accountability to patients

Democratic legitimacy

Informed choice & control

‘no decision about me without me’

  • Strengthened regulatory role
  • Break down barriers between Health and Social Care
  • Increased collaboration across statutory and 3rd sector
  • Decisions closer to people – GP consortia
  • Quality of care - Patient Safety
  • Quality Innovation Prevention & Productivity
  • Outcome focused

AFFORDABILITY

primary driver 2 legislative framework
Primary Driver 2 - Legislative Framework

Existing Legislation

Human Rights Act 1998

Mental Capacity Act 2005 amended 2007

NHS & Community Care Act 1990

Health and Social Care Act 2008 – regulation; direct payments

Equalities Act 2010 

Domestic Violence Crimes and Victims Act 2004

SVG Act

……… and the rest!

Law Commission Review – April 2011

Social Care Bill – Autumn 2011

case law
Case Law
  • Limitations of Local Authority duty and authority

- to investigate, act where person lacks capacity, support, guide, inform and involve police where necessary Justice Hedley: Re Z (Local Authority: Duty (2004) EWHC 2817 (Fam).

- to support not to control…. Court authority required before any attempt to control, coerceJustice Munby -A & C [2010] EWHC 978 (Fam)

  • Best Interest and Risk Enablement

- sensible risk appraisal not striving to avoid all risk….. in particular to achieve the vital good of the elderly or vulnerable persons happiness. What good is making someone safer if it merely makes them miserable?’Justice Munby MM (An Adult) (2007) EWHC 2003 (Fam), (2009)

  • Use of Inherent Jurisdiction for those with Capacity

- Capacitated persons ability and free choice to make decisions and give true consent may be impaired if under constraint, coersion, undue influence. Court may be asked to intervene but jurisdiction will be used sparingly and only to enable the person to make decisions without the external pressures

Re SA (2005) EWHC 2942 (Fam)(Case related to forced marriage) – Justice Munby

(JE 2009 unreported)

primary driver 3 no secrets consultation
Primary Driver 3 – No Secrets Consultation

People experiencing safeguarding reported

They got lost in the system

Safeguarding should not be at the cost of other qualities of life

Wanted to be listened to & and to make choices

They are not children

General

Prevention – pro active safeguarding system

Balance protection and levels of intervention – enable people to take considered risk.

The NHS

Struggling to engage with safeguarding – seen as the LA responsibility

Failure to recognise safeguarding concerns arise in NHS care

Need to create culture of openness and learning

Need for leadership and accountability

Need to integrate clinical governance and safeguarding

primary driver 4 learning from inquests inquiries research
Primary Driver 4 – Learning from Inquests, Inquiries & Research

Steven Hoskins 2006- failures in identifying vulnerability & risk indicators; partnerships – information sharing; eligibility criteria; assessment of decision making capacity;

Fiona Pilkington 2007 – failures in identifying vulnerability & risk indicators; failure to share information and refer on

Margaret Panting 2001 – self determination balanced with duty of care

  • Mid Staffordshire – failures to focus on quality; failure to listen to patients; need for early warning systems; role of commissioners and regulators - failure to use intelligent information
  • Death by Indifference – institutional discrimination led to deaths
  • Cornwall Partnership NHS Trust 2006 inadequate arrangements to protect vulnerable adults; staff largely unaware of what constituted abuse.
  • Shipman Inquiry 2004; Kerr & Haslam 2005
  • Etc Etc
  • AEA Prevalence Study 2007
  • Womens Aid – Making the Links: Disabled Women and Domestic Violence 2008
  • Domestic Abuse in older women; University of Sheffield ( Autumn 2010)
  • CSCI/HCC research – restrictive care; institutional abuse
  • Demographic Change – National Office Statistics
distilling the primary drivers
Distilling the Primary Drivers

For Individuals

Choice and control

Enablement

Full and informed consent

Representation and making best interests decision for those lacking capacity.

Least intrusive means

  • For Services and Systems
  • Focus on prevention
  • Limited intervention - proportionality
  • Partnerships and cooperation
  • Greater community involvement
  • Managing across plurality of providers and under new commissioning systems
  • Accountability for quality of services – to public , commissioners and regulators
  • Systems need to be affordable
what does this mean for the nhs
The NHS have a key role to play in their own services -preventing harm occurring and responding effectively where harm occurs

The NHS also have a key role in supporting adults at risk within their own communities and within other services.

What does this mean for the NHS?
safeguarding is integral to quality outcomes
Safeguarding is Integral to Quality & Outcomes

Clinical

Effectiveness

Patient

safety

Dignity in Care

Safeguarding

Prevention

Policy areas –

E.G Dementia

Strategy

6 Lives

Carers strategy

Patient

Experience

safeguarding as a continuum
Safeguarding as a continuum

Safeguarding activity

addressing safeguarding prevention and early intervention
Addressing Safeguarding – prevention and early intervention

Patient empowerment

  • Build resilience factors – personal, social, environmental
  • Maximise decision making
  • Minimise the impact of disability/condition – Aids; adaptations; assistive technology; relapse prevention planning
  • Person centred planning - risk enablement ; ‘Stay safe’ personal plans
  • Effective communication - Information , choices
  • Promote advance planning – LPA; Advance decisions; statements of preference
  • Access to complaints
  • Patient involvement in service /strategic planning & review

Prevention/early intervention in the care –

ID higher risk patients – person centred care planning – support with eating drinking;

Safe physical environments

What are high risk areas of care? Pressure ulcer care? Discharge?

ID risks in environment

addressing safeguarding prevention and early intervention1
Addressing Safeguarding – prevention and early intervention

Care and Environment

  • Identify patients at greater risk of harm - e.g. assistance to eat and drink; pressure care; communication needs; enhanced discharge planning; privacy & dignity; consent; advocacy requirements?
  • How is use of restriction and restraint governed?
  • How are carers identified – carers assessments and support plans?
  • What are your organisations critical points of care? – e.g. Pressure ulcers; medication; discharge; capacity and capability of staff; managing challenging patient behaviours;
  • Which wards/services present highest risk?
  • How is clinical governance informing preventative/early intervention?
  • How do commissioners know that quality care is being delivered?
  • Strategic partnerships – Wellbeing and Health; Safer Communities

Prevention/early intervention in the care –

ID higher risk patients – person centred care planning – support with eating drinking;

Safe physical environments

What are high risk areas of care? Pressure ulcer care? Discharge?

ID risks in environment

addressing safeguarding concerns in community pathway
What is the patient’s desired outcome and how can they be supported to achieve this?

Does the patient have capacity to make decisions about their safeguarding? – Maximise involvement; representation

Who else may be at risk of harm?

Who needs to be involved?

Relationship with the patient

Clinical/ specialist skills & knowledge required

Roles & responsibilities required for investigation; risk assessment; support/protection plan & review

Single agency or multi agency?

How do we know we have improved the outcome for the patient?

Addressing Safeguarding Concerns in Community Pathway
addressing safeguarding concerns in services
How are concerns identified and managed ?

How are complaints and incidents integrated within safeguarding?

How are decisions made about when to refer?

How do you work with local multi agency safeguarding partners?

- Cooperation

Accountability

Proportionality

How are decisions made within your interagency procedures about internal or independent investigation? What’s the role of commissioners and regulators in this?

How is the patient supported throughout?

How do we know we have improved the outcome for the patient?

How do we know lessons learned have improved outcomes?

Addressing Safeguarding Concerns in Services
clinical governance safeguarding
Clinical Governance & Safeguarding

Serious case review - IMRs

Serious Incident - reporting & investigation

Safeguarding

Procedures

Preventative /Early Intervention Safeguarding

Clinical incident –e.g. near miss

ad