Monitoring the high energy transient sky with the 9-spacecraft interplanetary network
Download
1 / 18

Monitoring the high energy transient sky with the 9-spacecraft interplanetary network - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 107 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Monitoring the high energy transient sky with the 9-spacecraft interplanetary network. AGILE Fermi INTEGRAL RHESSI. MESSENGER Swift Suzaku Odyssey. Wind.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha

Download Presentation

Monitoring the high energy transient sky with the 9-spacecraft interplanetary network

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Monitoring the high energy transient sky with the 9 spacecraft interplanetary network

Monitoring the high energy transient sky with the 9-spacecraft interplanetary network

AGILE Fermi INTEGRAL RHESSI

MESSENGER SwiftSuzakuOdyssey

Wind

S. Golenetskii, R. Aptekar, E. Mazets, V. Pal'shin, D. Frederiks (Ioffe Institute, St. Petersburg, I. G. Mitrofanov, D. Golovin, M. L. Litvak, A. B. Sanin (Space Research Institute, Moscow), W. Boynton, C. Fellows, K. Harshman, R. Starr (University of Arizona), A. von Kienlin, A. Rau (MPE, Germany), K. Yamaoka (Aoyama Gakuin University, Japan), M. Ohno, T. Takahashi (ISAS/JAXA, Japan ), Y. Fukazawa (Hiroshima University, Japan), M., Tashiro, Y. Terada (Saitama University, Japan), T. Murakami (Kanazawa University, Japan), K. Makishima (RIKEN, Japan), S. Barthelmy, T. Cline, J. Cummings, N. Gehrels, H. Krimm (Goddard Space Flight Center), J. Goldsten (APL JHU), E. Del Monte, M. Feroci (IASF/INAF, Roma, Italy), M. Marisaldi (IASF/INAF, Bologna, Italy), M. Briggs, V. Connaughton (UAH), C. Meegan (USRA), D. M. Smith (U.C. Santa Cruz), C. Wigger, W. Hajdas (PSI, Switzerland)

Kevin Hurley

UC Berkeley Space Sciences Laboratory

khurley@ssl.berkeley.edu


Interplanetary networks have been around since the 70 s
Interplanetary Networks Have Been Around Since the 70’s 9-spacecraft interplanetary network

  • Initially, they were the only way to obtain precise positions for gamma-ray bursts

  • Today we have Swift, so the IPN serves other purposes, such as:

    • Searches for gravitational radiation associated with GRBs and SGRs*

    • Searches for ν emission in conjunction with bursts

    • Ground-based searches for VHE γ-ray emission

    • Investigating the GRB/Supernova connection*

    • Monitoring magnetar bursts

    • Refining Fermi*, AGILE, and occasionally Swift and INTEGRAL error boxes

    • Providing a searchable historical record

    • Etc.

  • The IPN detection rate is high (350/y), and the bursts detected tend to be the brighter and closer ones (z<4.5)


The missions and experiments comprising the ipn
The Missions and Experiments Comprising the IPN 9-spacecraft interplanetary network

  • AGILE (Super-AGILE, Mini-Calorimeter)

  • Fermi (Gamma Burst Monitor)

  • INTEGRAL (SPI Anticoincidence System)

  • RHESSI (Ge spectrometer array)

  • Mars Odyssey (High Energy Neutron Spectrometer)

  • MESSENGER (Gamma-Ray and Neutron Spectrometer)

  • Suzaku (Hard X-Ray Detector Wide Area Monitor)

  • Swift (Burst Alert Telescope)

  • Wind (Konus)


Monitoring the high energy transient sky with the 9 spacecraft interplanetary network

The current configuration of the network 9-spacecraft interplanetary network

Mars

(Odyssey)

1000 l-s

.

.

Mercury

(MESSENGER)

..

600 l-s

.

.

.

LEO Spacecraft

24 light-ms

RHESSI

AGILE

WIND

6 light-s

Swift

INTEGRAL

0.5 light-s

Suzaku

Fermi


Localization capabilities
Localization Capabilities 9-spacecraft interplanetary network


The ipn detects sn grbs
THE IPN DETECTS SN/GRBs 9-spacecraft interplanetary network


Search for previously unknown grb sne with e pian and a corsi
Search for Previously Unknown GRB/SNe 9-spacecraft interplanetary network(with E. Pian and A. Corsi)

  • We used the IPN data on 37 core-collapse SNe in 2005 to investigate as-yet undiscovered GRB/SNe associations

  • We selected the GRBs which occurred in a time window around the estimated explosion (~weeks) and looked for positional coincidences

  • 873 bursts occurred within the time windows

  • 90 had positions which were consistent with the positions of the SNe

  • 66 coincidences would be expected by chance

  • Interesting, but not statistically significant


Refining fermi gbm localizations
Refining Fermi GBM localizations 9-spacecraft interplanetary network


Refining fermi gbm localizations1
Refining Fermi GBM Localizations 9-spacecraft interplanetary network

  • Fermi GBM error box sizes are reduced by up to several orders of magnitude, and Fermi systematic uncertainties can be improved

  • Refined Fermi GBM/IPN localizations can be searched more efficiently

    • by the Fermi LAT team for evidence of prompt or delayed high energy emission

    • in the optical (e.g. Palomar Transient Factory, ROTSE)


Ligo ipn collaboration with i leonor and p kalmus
LIGO/IPN Collaboration 9-spacecraft interplanetary network (with I. Leonor and P. Kalmus)

  • The IPN has furnished GRB and SGR times and locations to the LIGO collaboration since the very early engineering runs

  • During the 5th Science Run (November 2005 – September 2007) we have identified 380 GRBs and numerous SGRs which occurred when both LIGO and Virgo had good data

  • This is the largest GRB sample used in a gravitational wave search to date

  • IPN bursts constitute a large sample of nearby events, and one short-duration GRB every 12 days, a fairly high rate


Bookkeeping
Bookkeeping 9-spacecraft interplanetary network

  • A list of all the bursts observed by the IPN is available on the website

    • Which spacecraft detected them

    • Nature of the event (GRB, SGR, possible GRB, solar…)

    • 24,657 entries, 1990 – 2010 (only 8869 are confirmed bursts)

    • Localization data on 6345 events

  • Most IPN bursts are no longer announced in GCN Circulars, unless they are unusual in some way, or seem to merit rapid follow-up observations


Monitoring the high energy transient sky with the 9 spacecraft interplanetary network


Ipn database
IPN Database 9-spacecraft interplanetary network

  • The IPN database is public: ssl.berkeley.edu/ipn3

  • Some of the data are not easy to use for some studies, but tools are available to help

  • Contact me for more information

    • khurley@ssl.berkeley.edu


Monitoring the high energy transient sky with the 9 spacecraft interplanetary network

Monitoring the high energy transient sky with the 9-spacecraft interplanetary network

AGILE Fermi INTEGRAL RHESSI

MESSENGER SwiftSuzakuOdyssey

Wind

S. Golenetskii, R. Aptekar, E. Mazets, V. Pal'shin, D. Frederiks (Ioffe Institute, St. Petersburg, I. G. Mitrofanov, D. Golovin, M. L. Litvak, A. B. Sanin (Space Research Institute, Moscow), W. Boynton, C. Fellows, K. Harshman, R. Starr (University of Arizona), A. von Kienlin, A. Rau (MPE, Germany), K. Yamaoka (Aoyama Gakuin University, Japan), M. Ohno, T. Takahashi (ISAS/JAXA, Japan ), Y. Fukazawa (Hiroshima University, Japan), M., Tashiro, Y. Terada (Saitama University, Japan), T. Murakami (Kanazawa University, Japan), K. Makishima (RIKEN, Japan), S. Barthelmy, T. Cline, J. Cummings, N. Gehrels, H. Krimm (Goddard Space Flight Center), J. Goldsten (APL JHU), E. Del Monte, M. Feroci (IASF/INAF, Roma, Italy), M. Marisaldi (IASF/INAF, Bologna, Italy), M. Briggs, V. Connaughton (UAH), C. Meegan (USRA), D. M. Smith (U.C. Santa Cruz), C. Wigger, W. Hajdas (PSI, Switzerland)

Kevin Hurley

UC Berkeley Space Sciences Laboratory

khurley@ssl.berkeley.edu


Overlap between swift fermi and ipn bursts based on june 2008 june 2009 data
Overlap between Swift, Fermi, and IPN Bursts 9-spacecraft interplanetary network(Based on June 2008 – June 2009 data)

Swift

182/yr

Fermi

255/yr

IPN

346/yr

83

52

119


Sensitivities
Sensitivities 9-spacecraft interplanetary network

  • Sensitivity is a function of GRB duration, spectrum, peak flux, and fluence, and the instrument energy range, and time resolution, among other things

  • Using only the GRB fluence, in various energy ranges between ~25 and ~150 keV for a rough comparison:

    • Swift BAT 1.2 x 10-8 erg cm-2

    • Fermi – GBM4.0 x 10-8 erg cm-2

    • IPN5.0 x 10-7 erg cm-2


Redshift ranges sampled
Redshift Ranges Sampled 9-spacecraft interplanetary network


Ligo ipn collaboration with i leonor and p kalmus1
LIGO/IPN Collaboration 9-spacecraft interplanetary network(with I. Leonor and P. Kalmus)

  • The IPN has furnished GRB and SGR times and locations to the LIGO collaboration since the very early engineering runs

  • LIGO upper limits for the IPN GRB 070201 (possible extragalactic giant magnetar flare) were published in Abbott et al., Implications for the Origin of GRB 070201 from LIGO Observations, Ap. J. 681, 1419, 2008

  • LIGO upper limits to IPN and other SGR bursts were published in Abbott et al., Search for Gravitational-Wave Bursts from Soft Gamma Repeaters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 211102, 2008


ad
  • Login