Australian national aquatic ecosystem anae classification scheme
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 25

Australian National Aquatic Ecosystem (ANAE) Classification Scheme PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 89 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Australian National Aquatic Ecosystem (ANAE) Classification Scheme. Overview and Status. Estuarine-Marine Workshop, Canberra 14 th May 2013. Christopher Auricht and Sarah Imgraben. Why do we need a national Classification?.

Download Presentation

Australian National Aquatic Ecosystem (ANAE) Classification Scheme

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Australian national aquatic ecosystem anae classification scheme

Australian National Aquatic Ecosystem (ANAE) Classification Scheme

Overview and Status

Estuarine-Marine Workshop, Canberra 14th May 2013

Christopher Auricht and Sarah Imgraben


Why do we need a national classification

Why do we need a national Classification?

  • Not possible to manage aquatic systems if you don’t know where they are, what theyare, and how they function. (Plus information on values, threatening processes & changes over time)

  • Need to represent the broad range of systems in simple meaningful, discrete and ecologically relevant groups


Australian national aquatic ecosystem anae classification scheme

Aquatic Systems

Riverine (+ fringing vegetation)

Lake – Lacustrine

Estuarine & Marine

Vegetated swamp – Palustrine


Integrated system

Riv

Lac

Est

Pal (GDE)

Pal

Riv (GDE)

SUB (GDE)

Lac (GDE)

Mar

Integrated System


Overall ae adaptive mgmt framework where classification fits current understanding

Mapping

HEVAE

NRS

Mgmt

Threatened Sp

EWR’s

Climate Change

CfoC

Overall AE Adaptive Mgmt Framework - Where Classification Fits (Current Understanding)

What they are

Applications for classification

How they function

Values, services, threats & pressures

Where they are

How are they changing - monitoring


Requirements for generic national system

Requirements for Generic National System

  • Applicable at multiple scales (spatial and temporal)

  • Integrate between different aquatic habitats (functional aspects and connectivity)

  • Utilise and integrate existing national datasets (remote sensing)

  • Translation with jurisdictional databases / systems

  • Workable with different levels of data availability (data rich, data poor)

  • Transparent, comprehensive, inclusive, easy to use

  • Scientifically rigorous


Classification approaches

Classification Approaches

  • Unstructured – list e.g. Ramsar, DIWA

  • Abiotic - driver based e.g. River Styles, estuarine, hydrogeomorphic

  • Biological - bottom-up, species e.g. State-based bioregionalisations

  • Holistic – combination of abiotic and biotic

    e.g. Cowardin, IBRA, IMCRA, ANAE


Anae key features

ANAE: Key Features

  • Based on clearly defined and described attributes at three levels (two regionalisations)

  • Attributes are key drivers of ecological functioning at different levels

  • Attributes link to each other in different systems

  • Allows for a combination of attributes (system) used to determine habitat ‘type’ but types are not specified within the system

  • Structured but non-hierarchical at system and habitat level

  • Not all attributes are needed or available all the time


Spatial scales

Spatial Scales

Level 3 Site / Asset Delineation

Classification


Anae structure

ANAE Structure


Structure unpacked

Structure - unpacked


Level 1

Level 1

A broad driver based AE Regionalisation:

  • Landform – broad scale physiographic units from existing national regionalisation datasets provide the bio-geographic and evolutionary context for aquatic ecosystems and habitats

  • Climate – existing broad scale climate regionalisations e.g. Köppen, capture the broad differences in climate (temperature, rainfall and seasons) which are considered contemporary modifiers of the bio-geographic distribution and evolutionary traits of aquatic habitats

  • Hydrology – broad scale drainage divisions which capture the catchments within which aquatic habitats occur


Level 2

Level 2

A number of datasets and regionalisations exist that are appropriate to the landscape covering the thematic areas of:

  • Topography

  • Landform (inc floodplain / non-floodplain)

  • Water influence


Level 3 and attributes

Level 3 and attributes


Attributes inland coastal surface aquatics lacustrine palustrine riverine

Attributes: Inland & Coastal Surface Aquatics (lacustrine / palustrine / riverine)

  • Water Source

    • surface (flood/non-floodplain), groundwater, both

  • Water Type

    • saline, fresh

    • pH

  • Water Regime

    • permanent, intermittent, ephemeral

  • Substrate / Soil

    • peat, mineral, rock

  • Vegetation / Fringing Veg

    • forested, shrub, sedge/grass/forb or no emergent vegetation

  • Confinement (rivers only)


Case study lake eyre basin

Case Study - Lake Eyre Basin


Pros of the process

Pros of the process

Transparent system

Practical - efficient and effective

No gaps

Inclusive - can be widely applied throughout Australia – range of spatial and vertical scales

Attributes are used as necessary – not hierarchical

Attributes can be retrospectively applied to existing spatial datasets


Anae status

ANAE Status

  • AETG Classification Workshop October 2008, plus updates / discussion at AETG meetings 2009 and 2010

  • Concept to develop ANAE Classification Scheme (based on attributes and regionalisations) endorsed by NRPPC Meeting No 21, May 2009

  • Continued development process  Number of workshops and trials - Utility and application + ability to map existing systems into national system. (Throughout 2009 – 2010 period)


Anae status continued

ANAE Status - continued

  • Briefing to Australian Government, Canberra (also QLD) (June 2010)

  • Formal approval AETG, Min Council (2010 – 2012)

  • Aquatic Ecosystems Toolkit Module 2 Interim ANAE Classification a

  • Development of attributes –

    • Lacustrine and Palustrine – (reworked / updated  Connectivity. Trialled in LEB, Sth East and WA). Input to GDE Atlas

    • Riverine (workshop Adelaide, April 2010 – draft attributes  Current trial in MDBA).

    • Subterranean (workshop Adelaide, April 2010)  Input to GDE Atlas

    • Estuarine / Marine – need to split level 3 attributes (NEN & ICAG)


Estuarine marine attributes

Estuarine/Marine Attributes

  • Where/how do Estuarine and Marine systems fit within the scheme (Level 2 and 3)

  • What are the type/s of systems?

  • What attributes are required to ensure that the range of systems is integrated within the existing ANAE classification and/or reflected in the Asset identification process?

  • Are such measures consistent with the intent of the ANAE and can they be used to inform representativeness of assets?

  • Linkage with other systems e.g. OzCoasts & Catami


Issues

Issues

  • Practical application

  • Spatial Scale

  • Where does and estuary start and stop

  • Periodicity

  • Mixing

  • Water column and floor


  • Login