Chapter 14
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 99

Microbial Evolution and Systematics PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 71 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Chapter 14. Microbial Evolution and Systematics. I. Early Earth and the Origin and Diversification of Life. 14.1Formation and Early History of Earth 14.2Origin of Cellular Life 14.3Microbial Diversification: Consequences for Earth’s Biosphere 14.4Endosymbiotic Origin of Eukaryotes.

Download Presentation

Microbial Evolution and Systematics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Chapter 14

Chapter 14

Microbial Evolution and Systematics


I early earth and the origin and diversification of life

I. Early Earth and the Origin and Diversification of Life

  • 14.1Formation and Early History of Earth

  • 14.2Origin of Cellular Life

  • 14.3Microbial Diversification: Consequences for Earth’s Biosphere

  • 14.4Endosymbiotic Origin of Eukaryotes


14 1 formation and early history of earth

14.1 Formation and Early History of Earth

  • The Earth is ~ 4.5 billion years old

  • First evidence for microbial life can be found in rocks ~ 3.86 billion years old (southwestern Green land)


Microbial evolution and systematics

Ancient Microbial Life

3.45 billion-year-old rocks, South Africa

Figure 14.1


14 1 formation and early history of earth1

14.1 Formation and Early History of Earth

  • Stromatolites

    • Fossilized microbial mats consisting of layers of filamentous prokaryotes and trapped sediment

    • Found in rocks 3.5 billion years old or younger

    • Comparisons of ancient and modern stromatolites provide evidence that

      • Anoxygenic phototrophic filamentous bacteria formed ancient stromatolites (relatives of the green nonsulfur bacterium Chloroflexus)

      • Oxygenic phototrophic cyanobacteria dominate modern stromatolites


Microbial evolution and systematics

Ancient and Modern Stromatolites

3.5 billion yrs old

Oldest(Western Australia)

1.6 billion yrs old

(NorthernAustralia)

Modern stromatolites

(Western Australia)

Modern stromatolites

(WesternAustralia)

Modern stromatolites

(Yellow Stone NP)

Figure 14.2


Microbial evolution and systematics

More Recent Fossil Bacteria and Eukaryotes

From 1 billion yrs old rocks in Central Australia

Figure 14.3

Eukaryotic cells

Prokaryotes (bacteria)


14 2 origin of cellular life

14.2 Origin of Cellular Life

  • Early Earth was anoxic and much hotter than present day (over 100 oC)

  • First biochemical compounds were made by abiotic systems that set the stage for the origin of life


Microbial evolution and systematics

  • Surface origin hypothesis

    • Contends that the first membrane-enclosed, self-replicating cells arose out of primordial soup rich in organic and inorganic compounds in ponds on Earth’s surface

    • Dramatic temperature fluctuations and mixing from meteor impacts, dust clouds, and storms argue against this hypothesis


Microbial evolution and systematics

  • Subsurface origin hypothesis

    • States that life originated at hydrothermal springs on ocean floor

      • Conditions would have been more stable

      • Steady and abundant supply of energy (e.g., H2 and H2S) may have been available at these sites


Microbial evolution and systematics

Submarine Mound Formed at Ocean Hydrothermal Spring

Cooler, more oxidized, more acidic ocean water

Hot, reduced, alkaline hydrothermal fluid

Figure 14.4


Microbial evolution and systematics

  • Prebiotic chemistry of early Earth set stage for self-replicating systems

  • First self-replicating systems may have been RNA-based (RNA world theory)

    • RNA can bind small molecules (e.g., ATP, other nucleotides)

    • RNA has catalytic activity; may have catalyzed its own synthesis


Microbial evolution and systematics

A Model for the Origin of Cellular Life

Last Universal Common Ancestor

Figure 14.5


Microbial evolution and systematics

  • DNA, a more stable molecule, eventually became the genetic repository

  • Three-part systems (DNA, RNA, and protein) evolved and became universal among cells


Microbial evolution and systematics

  • Other important steps in emergence of cellular life

    • Build up of lipids

    • Synthesis of phospholipid membrane vesicles that enclosed the cell’s biochemical and replication machinery

      • May have been similar to vesicles synthesized on the surfaces of montmorillonite clay


Microbial evolution and systematics

Lipid Vesicles Made in the Laboratory from Myristic Acid

vesicle

RNAs

Vesicle synthesis is catalyzed by the surfaces of montmorillonite clay particles.

Figure 14.6


Microbial evolution and systematics

  • Last universal common ancestor (LUCA)

    • Population of early cells from which cellular life may have diverged into ancestors of modern day Bacteria and Archaea


Microbial evolution and systematics

  • As early Earth was anoxic, energy-generating metabolism of primitive cells was exclusively

    • Anaerobic and likely chemolithotrophic (autotrophic)

      • Obtained carbon from CO2

      • Obtained energy from H2; likely generated by H2S reacting with FeS or UV light


Microbial evolution and systematics

Major Landmarks in Biological Evolution

Figure 14.7


Microbial evolution and systematics

A Possible Energy-Generating Scheme for Primitive Cells

Figure 14.8


Microbial evolution and systematics

  • Early forms of chemolithotrophic metabolismwould have supported production of large amounts of organic compounds

  • Organic material provided abundant, diverse, and continually renewed source of reduced organic carbon, stimulating evolution of various chemoorganotrophic metabolisms


14 3 microbial diversification

14.3 Microbial Diversification

  • Molecular evidence suggests ancestors of Bacteria and Archaea diverged ~ 4 billion years ago

  • As lineages diverged, distinct metabolisms developed

  • Development of oxygenic photosynthesisdramatically changed course of evolution


Microbial evolution and systematics

  • ~ 2.7 billion years ago, cyanobacterial lineages developed a photosystem that could use H2O instead of H2S, generating O2

  • By 2.4 billion years ago, O2 concentrations raised to 1 part per million; initiation of the great oxidation event

  • O2 could not accumulate until it reacted with abundant reduced materials (i.e., FeS, FeS2) in the oceans

    • Banded iron formations: iron oxides (e.g. Fe2O3) in laminated sedimentary rocks; prominent feature in geological record


Microbial evolution and systematics

Banded Iron Formations

Iron oxides

Figure 14.9


Microbial evolution and systematics

  • Development of oxic atmosphere led to evolution of new metabolic pathways that yielded more energy than anaerobic metabolisms

  • Oxygen also spurred evolution of organelle-containing eukaryotic microorganisms

    • Oldest eukaryotic microfossils ~ 2 billion years old

    • Fossils of multicellular and more complex eukaryotes are found in rocks 1.9 to 1.4 billion years old


Microbial evolution and systematics

  • Consequence of O2 for the evolution of life

    • Formation of ozone layer that provides a barrier against UV radiation

      • Without this ozone shield, life would only have continued beneath ocean surface and in protected terrestrial environments


14 4 endosymbiotic origin of eukaryotes

14.4 Endosymbiotic Origin of Eukaryotes

  • Endosymbiosis

    • Well-supported hypothesis for origin of eukaryotic cells

    • Contends that mitochondria and chloroplasts arose from symbiotic association of prokaryotes within another type of cell


Microbial evolution and systematics

  • Two hypotheses exist to explain the formation of the eukaryotic cell

    1) Eukaryotes began as nucleus-bearing lineage that later acquired mitochondria and chloroplasts by endosymbiosis


Microbial evolution and systematics

2) Eukaryotic cell arose from intracellular association between O2-consuming bacterium (the symbiont), which gave rise to mitochondria, and an archaean host


Microbial evolution and systematics

  • Both hypotheses suggest eukaryotic cell is chimeric

  • This is supported by several features

    • Eukaryotes have similar lipids and energy metabolisms to Bacteria

    • Eukaryotes have transcription and translational machinery most similar to Archaea


Microbial evolution and systematics

Major Features Grouping Bacteria or Archaea with Eukarya

Table 14.1


Ii microbial evolution

II. Microbial Evolution

  • 14.5The Evolutionary Process

  • 14.6Evolutionary Analysis: Theoretical Aspects

  • 14.7Evolutionary Analysis: Analytical Methods

  • 14.8Microbial Phylogeny

  • 14.9Applications of SSU rRNA Phylogenetic Methods


14 5 the evolutionary process

14.5 The Evolutionary Process

  • Mutations

    • Changes in the nucleotide sequence of an organism’s genome

    • Occur because of errors in the fidelity of replication, UV radiation, and other factors

    • Adaptative mutations improve fitness of an organism, increasing its survival

  • Other genetic changes include gene duplication, horizontal gene transfer, and gene loss


14 6 evolutionary analysis theoretical aspects

14.6 Evolutionary Analysis: Theoretical Aspects

  • Phylogeny

    • Evolutionary history of a group of organisms

    • Inferred indirectly from nucleotide sequence data

  • Molecular clocks (chronometers)

    • Certain genes and proteins that are measures of evolutionary change

    • Major assumptions of this approach are that nucleotide changes occur at a constant rate, are generally neutral, and random


Microbial evolution and systematics

  • The most widely used molecular clocks are small subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA) genes

    • Found in all domains of life

      • 16S rRNA in prokaryotes and 18S rRNA in eukaryotes

    • Functionally constant

    • Sufficiently conserved (change slowly)

    • Sufficient length


Microbial evolution and systematics

Ribosomal RNA

16S rRNA from E. coli

Figure 14.11


Microbial evolution and systematics

  • Carl Woese

    • Pioneered the use of SSU rRNA for phylogenetic studies in 1970s

    • Established the presence of three domains of life:

      • Bacteria, Archaea, and Eukarya

    • Provided a unified phylogenetic framework for bacteria


Microbial evolution and systematics

  • The ribosomal database project (RDP)

    • A large collection of rRNA sequences

      • Currently contains > 409,000 sequences

    • Provides a variety of analytical programs


14 7 evolutionary analysis analytical methods

14.7 Evolutionary Analysis: Analytical Methods

  • Comparative rRNA sequencing is a routine procedure that involves

    • Amplification of the gene encoding SSU rRNA

    • Sequencing of the amplified gene

    • Analysis of sequence in reference to other sequences


Microbial evolution and systematics

PCR-Amplification of the 16S rRNA Gene

Figure 14.12


Microbial evolution and systematics

General PCR Protocol


Microbial evolution and systematics

  • The first step in sequence analysis involves aligning the sequence of interest with sequences from homologous (orthologous) genes from other strains or species


Microbial evolution and systematics

Alignment of DNA Sequences

Figure 14.13


Microbial evolution and systematics

  • BLAST (basic local alignment search tool)

    • Web-based tool of the National Institutes of Health

    • Aligns query sequences with those in GenBank database

    • Helpful in identifying gene sequences


Microbial evolution and systematics

  • Phylogenetic Tree

    • Graphic illustration of the relationships among sequences

    • Composed of nodes and branches

    • Branches define the order of descent and ancestry of the nodes

    • Branch length represents the number of changes that have occurred along that branch


Microbial evolution and systematics

Phylogenetic Trees: Unrooted (a) and Rooted (b-d) Forms

Figure 14.14


Microbial evolution and systematics

  • Evolutionary analysis uses character-state methods (cladistics) for tree reconstruction

  • The higher the proportion of characteristics that two organisms share, the more recently they diverged from a common ancestor

  • Cladistic methods

    • Define phylogenetic relationships by examining changes in nucleotides at individual positions in the sequence

    • Use those characters that are phylogenetically informative and define monophyletic groups (a group which contains all the descendants of a common ancestor; a clade)


Microbial evolution and systematics

Identification of Phylogenetically Informative Sites

Dots: neutral sites.

Arrows: phylogenetically informative sites, varying in at least two of the sequences.

Figure 14.15


Microbial evolution and systematics

  • Common cladistic methods

    • Parsimony

    • Maximum likelihood

    • Bayesian analysis


14 8 microbial phylogeny

14.8 Microbial Phylogeny

  • The universal phylogenetic tree based on SSU rRNA genes is a genealogy of all life on Earth


Microbial evolution and systematics

Universal Phylogenetic Tree as Determined by rRNA Genes

Figure 14.16


Microbial evolution and systematics

  • Domain Bacteria

    • Contains at least 80 major evolutionary groups (phyla)

    • Many groups defined from environmental sequences (metagenome)alone

      • i.e., no cultured representatives

    • Many groups are phenotypically diverse

      • i.e., physiology and phylogeny not necessarily linked

  • Eukaryotic organelles originated within Bacteria

    • Mitochondria arose from Proteobacteria

    • Chloroplasts arose from the cyanobacterial phylum


Microbial evolution and systematics

  • Domain Archaea consists of two major groups

    • Crenarchaeota

    • Euryarchaeota


Microbial evolution and systematics

  • Each of the three domains of life can be characterized by various phenotypic properties


Microbial evolution and systematics

Major Features Distinguishing Prokaryotes from Eukarya


Microbial evolution and systematics

Major Features Distinguishing Prokaryotes from Eukarya


14 9 applications of ssu rrna phylogenetic methods

14.9 Applications of SSU rRNA Phylogenetic Methods

  • Signature Sequences

    • Short oligonucleotides unique to certain groups of organisms

    • Often used to design specific nucleic acid probes

  • Probes

    • Can be general or specific

    • Can be labeled with fluorescent tags and hybridized to rRNA in ribosomes within cells

      • FISH: fluorescent in situ hybridization

    • Circumvent need to cultivate organism(s)


Microbial evolution and systematics

Fluorescently Labeled rRNA Probes: Phylogenetic Stains

Stained with universal rRNA probe

Stained with a eukaryotic rRNA probe

Figure 14.17


Microbial evolution and systematics

  • PCR can be used to amplify SSU rRNA genes from members of a microbial community

    • Genes can be sorted out, sequenced, and analyzed

    • Such approaches have revealed key features of microbial community structure and microbial interactions


Microbial evolution and systematics

  • Ribotyping

    • Method of identifying microbes from analysis of DNA fragments generated from restriction enzyme digestion of genes encoding SSU rRNA

    • Highly specific and rapid

    • Used in bacterial identification in clinical diagnostics and microbial analyses of food, water, and beverage


Microbial evolution and systematics

Ribotyping

Figure 14.18


Iii microbial systematics

III. Microbial Systematics

  • 14.10 Phenotypic Analysis

  • 14.11 Genotypic Analysis

  • 14.12 Phylogenetic Analysis

  • 14.13 The Species Concept in Microbiology

  • 14.14 Classification and Nomenclature


14 10 phenotypic analysis

14.10 Phenotypic Analysis

  • Taxonomy

    • The science of identification, classification, and nomenclature

  • Systematics

    • The study of the diversity of organisms and their relationships

    • Links phylogeny with taxonomy


Microbial evolution and systematics

  • Bacterial taxonomy incorporates multiple methods for identification and description of new species

  • The polyphasic approach to taxonomy uses three methods

    1) Phenotypic analysis

    2) Genotypic analysis

    3) Phylogenetic analysis


Microbial evolution and systematics

  • Phenotypic analysis examines the morphological, metabolic, physiological, and chemical characters of the cell


Microbial evolution and systematics

Some Phenotypic Characteristics of Taxonomic Value

Table 14.3


Microbial evolution and systematics

Some Phenotypic Characteristics of Taxonomic Value

Table 14.3


Microbial evolution and systematics

  • Fatty Acid Analyses (FAME: fatty acid methyl ester)

    • Relies on variation in type and proportion of fatty acids present in membrane lipids for specific prokaryotic groups

    • Requires rigid standardization because FAME profiles can vary as a function of temperature, growth phase, and growth medium


Microbial evolution and systematics

Fatty Acid Methyl Ester (FAME) Analysis

Figure 14.19a


Microbial evolution and systematics

Fatty Acid Methyl Ester (FAME) Analysis

Figure 14.19b


14 11 genotypic analysis

14.11 Genotypic Analysis

  • Several methods of genotypic analysis are available and used

    • DNA-DNA hybridization

    • DNA profiling

    • Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST)

    • GC Ratio


Microbial evolution and systematics

Some Genotypic Methods Used in Bacterial Taxonomy


Microbial evolution and systematics

  • DNA-DNA hybridization

    • Genomes of two organisms are hybridized to examine proportion of similarities in their gene sequences


Microbial evolution and systematics

Genomic Hybridization as a Taxonomic Tool

Figure 14.20a


Microbial evolution and systematics

Figure 14.20b


Microbial evolution and systematics

Figure 14.20c


Microbial evolution and systematics

  • DNA-DNA hybridization

    • Provides rough index of similarity between two organisms

    • Useful complement to SSU rRNA gene sequencing

    • Useful for differentiating very similar organisms

    • Hybridization values 70% or higher suggest strains belong to the same species

      • Values of at least 25% suggest same genus


Microbial evolution and systematics

Relationship Between SSU rRNA and DNA Hybridization

97

95

25

70


Microbial evolution and systematics

  • DNA Profiling

    • Several methods can be used to generate DNA fragment patterns for analysis of genotypic similarity among strains, including

      • Ribotyping: focuses on a single gene (SSU rRNA)

      • Repetitive extragenic palindromic PCR (rep-PCR): focused on highly conserved repetitive DNA elements

      • Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP):focus on many genes located randomly throughout genome

        - digestion of genomic DNA with one or two restriction

        enzymes and selective PCR of resulting fragments


Microbial evolution and systematics

DNA Fingerprinting with rep-PCR

Figure 14.22


Microbial evolution and systematics

  • Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST)

    • Method in which several different “housekeeping genes” from an organism are sequenced (~450-bp)

    • Has sufficient resolving power to distinguish between very closely related strains


Multilocus sequence typing

Multilocus Sequence Typing


Microbial evolution and systematics

  • GC Ratios

    • Percentage of guanine plus cytosine in an organism’s genomic DNA

    • Vary between 20 and 80% among Bacteria and Archaea

    • Generally accepted that if GC ratios of two strains differ by ~ 5% they are unlikely to be closely related


14 12 phylogenetic analysis

14.12 Phylogenetic Analysis

  • 16S rRNA gene sequences are useful in taxonomy; serve as “gold standard” for the identification and description of new species

    • Proposed that a bacterium should be considered a new species if its 16S rRNA gene sequence differs by more than 3% from any named strain, and a new genus if it differs by more than 5%


Microbial evolution and systematics

  • The lack of divergence of the 16S rRNA gene limits its effectiveness in discriminating between bacteria at the species level, thus, a multi-gene approach can be used

  • Multi-gene sequence analysis is similar to MLST, but uses complete sequences and comparisons are made using cladistic methods


Microbial evolution and systematics

  • Whole-genome sequence analyses are becoming more common

    • Provide many traits for comparative genotypic analysis

    • Genome structure

      - size and number of chromosomes, GC ratio, linear or circular, etc.

    • Gene content

    • Gene order


14 13 the species concept in microbiology

14.13 The Species Concept in Microbiology

  • No universally accepted concept of species for prokaryotes

  • Current definition of prokaryotic species

    • Collection of strains sharing a high degree of similarity in several independent traits

      • Most important traits include 70% or greater DNA-DNA hybridization and 97% or greater 16S rRNA gene sequence identity


Microbial evolution and systematics

Taxonomic Hierarchy for Allochromatium warmingii


Microbial evolution and systematics

  • Biological species concept: not meaningful for prokaryotes as they are haploid and do not undergo sexual reproduction

  • Genealogical species concept: an alternative

    • Prokaryotic species is a group of strains that based on DNA sequences of multiple genes cluster closely with others phylogenetically and are distinct from other groups of strains


Microbial evolution and systematics

Multi-Gene Phylogenetic Analysis

16S rRNA genes

gyrB genes

luxABFE genes

50 nucleotide changes

Figure 14.24


Microbial evolution and systematics

  • Ecotype

    • Population of cells that share a particular resource

    • Different ecotypes can coexist in a habitat

  • Bacterial speciation may occur from a combination of repeated periodic selection for a favorable trait within an ecotype and lateral gene flow


Microbial evolution and systematics

A Model for Bacterial Speciation

Figure 14.25


Microbial evolution and systematics

  • This model is based solely on the assumption of vertical gene flow

  • New genetic capabilities can also arise by horizontal gene transfer

    - the extent among bacteria is variable


Microbial evolution and systematics

  • No firm estimate on the number of prokaryotic species

  • Nearly 7,000 species of Bacteria and Archaea are presently known


14 14 classification and nomenclature

14.14 Classification and Nomenclature

  • Classification

    • Organization of organisms into progressively more inclusive groups on the basis of either phenotypic similarity or evolutionary relationship


Microbial evolution and systematics

  • Prokaryotes are given descriptive genus names and species epithets following the binomial system of nomenclature used throughout biology

  • Assignment of names for species and higher groups of prokaryotes is regulated by the Bacteriological Code- The International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria


Microbial evolution and systematics

  • Major references in bacterial diversity

    • Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology (Springer)

    • The Prokaryotes (Springer)


Microbial evolution and systematics

  • Formal recognition of a new prokaryotic species requires

    • Deposition of a sample of the organism in two culture collections

    • Official publication of the new species name and description in the International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology (IJSEM)

  • The International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes (ICSP) is responsible for overseeing nomenclature and taxonomy of Bacteria and Archaea


Microbial evolution and systematics

KCCM Korean Culture Center of Microorganisms Seoul, Korea http://www.kccm.or.kr

KACC Korean Agricultural Culture Collection Suwon, Korea http://kacc.rda.go.kr

Some National Microbial Culture Collections

Table 14.6


  • Login