Loading in 5 sec....

Greeline to Greenline Width (GGW)PowerPoint Presentation

Greeline to Greenline Width (GGW)

- 116 Views
- Uploaded on

Download Presentation
## PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Greeline to Greenline Width (GGW)' - genevieve-foley

**An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation**

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript

### Why take out the Vegetated Islands?

### Residual Pool and Pool Frequency associated with the hoofprint; therefore, there is no indicator of instability so covered (C) and absent (A) are recorded.

### Substrate frequency and residual depth

Greeline to Greenline Width (GGW)

Non vegetated Channel width

GGW

- The non-vegetated distance between the greenlines on each side of the stream.
- Using “Greenline rules” adds precision to the measurement
- Consistent GGW measurements between observers validates the greenline rules

GGW approximates the scoured, or non-vegetated width of the channel.

Including islands adds width bias to the estimate.

Typically, we are estimating the width of the “active” channel which normally excludes vegetated bars and islands.

Exclude Vegetation

Conclusions - GGW

- Reasonably unbiased: measured data
- Repeatable: Precision +- 5%
- Accurate: Alpha = .05 with sample sizes of from 50 to 100
- Fast: <1 hour with laser range finder, 1.5 hours with rod

What are streambanks?

Streambanks

That portion of the channel cross section:

- above the scour line, and

- below the lip of the first bench.

Scour Line: The lower elevational limit of a streambank. On erosionsal banks, the scour line is the elevation of seasonal scour – often marked by undercut sod.

Scour line

Scour line: On depositional banks, the scour line is the lower limit of sod-forming or perennial vegetation – or the potential lower limit of sod-forming vegetation

Top of Bank – lip of first bench

Bank

Bank

Scour line

What is the streambank evaluated? Above the Scour Line and at the steepest angle to the water surface.

On erosional banks the measurement extends up to the bench or top of cutbank.

On bars, it extends up to the top of the depositional feature: approximately bankfull level

Scour Line

The first bench is the first relatively flat area above the scour line or edge of the water

Step 1 Depositional or Erosional?

- Depositional: deposited bars – Point bars, lateral bars
- Erosional: all other banks

Step 2 Covered or Uncovered

- Covered: at least 50% foliar cover of perennial vegetation (including roots); at least 50% cover of cobbles six inches or larger; at least 50% cover of anchored large woody debris (LWD) with a diameter of four inches or greater;
- Uncovered: applies to all banks that are not “Covered” as defined above.

Step 3 IF “Erosional”, are any of the following present….

Fracture: a visiblecrack is observed. The fracture has not separated into two separate components or blocks of a bank. Cracks indicate a high risk of breakdown. The fracture feature must be at least ¼ of a frame length or greater than about 13 cm of bank length.

Slump: streambank that has obviously slipped down resulting in a separate block of soil/sod separated from the bank.

Slough or “sluff soil material has fallen from and accumulated near the base of the bank. “Slough” typically occurs on banks that are steep and bare.

Eroding: applies to banks that are bare and steep (within 10 degrees of vertical), usually located on the outside curves of meander bends in the stream.

Fracture

Trampling by large herbivores has caused obvious “slumping.” The slump is greater than one-fourth of the plot length and is recorded (S).

There is a hoofprint in the bank, but no slump or slough is associated with the hoofprint; therefore, there is no indicator of instability so covered (C) and absent (A) are recorded.

Top of bank associated with the hoofprint; therefore, there is no indicator of instability so covered (C) and absent (A) are recorded.

Scour line

Where is the top of the bank?

Where is the scour line?

What about entrenched channels? associated with the hoofprint; therefore, there is no indicator of instability so covered (C) and absent (A) are recorded.

The key: whether slough enters the stream

Where is the first Bench?

Slough enters stream – at or above the angle of repose associated with the hoofprint; therefore, there is no indicator of instability so covered (C) and absent (A) are recorded.

Lisle (1987) suggested a quick method for measuring pool frequency and residual depth:

- Measure distance between depth measurements along the thalweg.
- At thalweg depth measurements note the habitat (pool or riffle crest)
- To compute residual depth subtract depth at riffle crests from maximum pool depth
- The pool frequency is the number of pools per distance along the thalweg.

Pool – Riffle Sequence – Woody Creek frequency and residual depth

Potential Indicator of fish habitat quality frequency and residual depth

- Pools are vital components of fish habitat in streams, especially for larger fish
- Mossop and Bradford (2006) found a positive correlation between mean maximum residual pool depth and the density of Chinook salmon

FWS – Habitat Suitability Index for Cutthroat Trout frequency and residual depth

Influenced by grazing disturbances frequency and residual depth

In a review of the literature, Powell et al. (2000) concluded that channel characteristics, including channel width and depth, as well as bed material were often reported to be affected by livestock grazing in riparian areas.

Testing Repeatability frequency and residual depth

- Conducted 4 tests in 2009
- Little Truckee (9 crews)
- SF Beaver (4 crews)
- Summit Creek (6 crews)
- Smith Creek (3 crews)

Little Truckee River frequency and residual depth

- Pool structure – Complex
- RESIDUAL DEPTH
- Average Difference between observers = .01 meter
- Maximum Difference = .13 meters
- Coefficient of variation (SD/Mean) = 24%

- POOLS PER MILE
- Average Difference between observers = 12 per mile
- Maximum Difference = 21 per mile
- CV = 16%

Smith Creek frequency and residual depth

- POOL STRUCTURE - simple
- RESIDUAL DEPTH
- Average Difference between observers = .01 meter
- Maximum Difference = .1 meters
- Coefficient of variation (SD/Mean) = 11%

- POOLS PER MILE
- Average Difference between observers = 7 per mile
- Maximum Difference = 10 per mile
- CV = 16%

Size distribution and Percent Fines

Substrate frequency and residual depth

- Channel instability often leads to channel widening, where the energy balance between erosion and deposition shifts toward deposition and therefore fining of the substrate (Powell et al. 2000).
- Such increases in fines may degrade aquatic habitat by restricting the living spaces of substrate-dwelling organisms and by limiting the oxygen transfer to incubating eggs (Powell et al. 2000)

Substrate frequency and residual depth

- Pebble counting is a relatively efficient way to measure substrate size distributions and percent fines
- Site variability can be problematic. Pebble counts normally detect change when relatively high magnitude impacts are evaluated. The confidence interval is 11% using 200 particles minimum per site. The confidence interval narrows with more particles.

Tendancy frequency and residual depth to underestimate percent fines

- As noted by Bunte and Abt (2001), using different methods to sample substrate at the same location may yield different results. Thus trend over time should be based upon the same technique applied to each sampling event.

Spatial variability frequency and residual depth

- Sampling the entire length of the DMA (20 channel widths) is recommended to ensure spatial variability is accounted for in the sample scheme. If not, variability through time may reflect spatial heterogeneity more than actual adjustments in substrate size distributions.

Substrate Size Distribution frequency and residual depth

At 20 plot locations (200 samples)

Sampled between the greenlines

10 particles per plot (cross section) selected at heel and toe across the channel from greenline to greenline – total 200 particles

Can lay measuring rod across small streams to obtain sampling intervals

Small streams – use a measuring rod frequency and residual depth

Source frequency and residual depth

- The guidelines on bed material sampling provided by Bunte and Abt (2001) include an excellent summary of the literature and the principal base reference for this protocol.

Why the Substrate Template frequency and residual depth?

“Operator training is extremely important. When selecting particles from a predefined streambed location, or even when measuring particle sizes in a preselected sample of rocks, there is less variability between the results of experienced operators than between those obtained by novices. Field personnel need to be trained to perform procedures accurately, to avoid bias, and to use equipment that reduces operator induced error.” (Bunte and Abt (2001)

Download Presentation

Connecting to Server..