1 / 21

Hidden Rotation Measures

Hidden Rotation Measures. Lawrence Rudnick University of Minnesota with Damon Farnsworth, UMN Shea Brown, CSIRO. Take Home Messages. Two components with small RM differences can generate a wide range of complex behaviors.

gen
Download Presentation

Hidden Rotation Measures

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Hidden Rotation Measures Lawrence Rudnick University of Minnesota with Damon Farnsworth, UMN Shea Brown, CSIRO L. Rudnick: RM2010

  2. Take Home Messages • Two components with small RM differences can generate a wide range of complex behaviors. • Polarization angle behavior over wide bands can be reasonably fit with ca RM* l2 – but give the WRONG answer • RM synthesis can give the same WRONG answer as l2 fitting. • CAVEAT: RM(l2), P(l2). RM determinations must be tailored to the specific scientific goals, and must utilize multiple techniques, including RM synthesis, Q, U vs. l2and Q vs. U diagnostics. L. Rudnick: RM2010

  3. XRAY NVSS I NVSS P800 L. Rudnick: RM2010

  4. A little pre-history… L. Rudnick: RM2010

  5. Two simple components -- >polarization complexity Q, U vs.l2 P vs.l2 co,2 0o 20o 40o 60o 80o 100o AMP RM co 0.07 -5 90 0.05 -6 var L. Rudnick: RM2010

  6. 3C33 Polarization WSRT 352 MHz Q U Leahy & Perley, 1991 377.5 356.1 324.1 MHz MHz MHz L. Rudnick: RM2010

  7. 3C33 Polarization -7 rad/m2 L. Rudnick: RM2010

  8. 3C33 Polarization -7 rad/m2 L. Rudnick: RM2010

  9. 3C33 Polarization -7 rad/m2 RM synthesis -13 -11 -15 -9 -7 -5 -7 rad/m2 -3 -1 +1 L. Rudnick: RM2010

  10. 3C33 Polarization: -7 rad/m2 ? L. Rudnick: RM2010

  11. 3C33 Polarization AMP RM co 0.07 -3.1 93 0.05 -046 L. Rudnick: RM2010

  12. 3C33 Polarization AMP RM co 0.07 -3.1 93 0.05 -046 RM (l2) L. Rudnick: RM2010

  13. -10 -5 0 5 10 -10 -5 0 5 10 3C33 Polarization – the range of fits c2 RM weaker component RM stronger component L. Rudnick: RM2010

  14. -10 -5 0 5 10 -10 -5 0 5 10 Other 3C33 fits… Exclude 20cm RMs: -7.3, -9.4 RMs: -3.1, -0.52 Note: FACTOR of 2-3 in RMs L. Rudnick: RM2010

  15. RM synthesis and two components -10,-2 [b] L. Rudnick: RM2010

  16. RM synthesis and two components • Faraday spectrum peaks (P) are NOT at the input RMs • Whether two RMs are resolved depends on the PHASES of the components L. Rudnick: RM2010

  17. Addressing the challenge… • Very broad l2 coverage • Check for RM(l2) and P(l2) • Use ALL of the available diagnostics L. Rudnick: RM2010

  18. Take Home Messages • Two components with small RM differences can generate a wide range of complex behaviors. • Polarization angle behavior over wide bands can be reasonably fit with ca RM* l2 – but give the WRONG answer • RM synthesis can give the same WRONG answer as l2 fitting. • CAVEAT: RM(l2), P(l2). RM determinations must be tailored to the specific scientific goals, and must utilize multiple techniques, including RM synthesis, Q, U vs. l2and Q vs. U diagnostics. Partial support for this work was provided by U.S. National Science Foundation GrantbAST-0908668 to the University of Minnesota. L. Rudnick: RM2010

  19. Take Home Messages • Two components with small RM differences can generate a wide range of complex behaviors. • Polarization angle behavior over wide bands can be reasonably fit with ca RM* l2 – but give the WRONG answer • RM synthesis can give the same WRONG answer as l2 fitting. • CAVEAT: RM(l2), P(l2). RM determinations must be tailored to the specific scientific goals, and must utilize multiple techniques, including RM synthesis, Q, U vs. l2and Q vs. U diagnostics. #COROLLARY: When looking at trends – e.g. redshift, cluster impact parameter, size, etc. systematic errors in RM can be fatal. Partial support for this work was provided by U.S. National Science Foundation GrantbAST-0908668 to the University of Minnesota. L. Rudnick: RM2010

  20. L. Rudnick: RM2010

  21. L. Rudnick: RM2010

More Related