1 / 28

Incorporating a Web-based, Integrative Medicine Curriculum into 8 Family Medicine Residencies: Keys to Success

Incorporating a Web-based, Integrative Medicine Curriculum into 8 Family Medicine Residencies: Keys to Success. Victoria Maizes, M.D., Victor Sierpina, M.D., John Woytowicz, M.D., Selma Sroka, M.D., Sally Dodds, Ph.D., & Patricia Lebensohn, M.D. Presentation Objectives.

gen
Download Presentation

Incorporating a Web-based, Integrative Medicine Curriculum into 8 Family Medicine Residencies: Keys to Success

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Incorporating a Web-based, Integrative Medicine Curriculum into 8 Family Medicine Residencies: Keys to Success Victoria Maizes, M.D., Victor Sierpina, M.D., John Woytowicz, M.D., Selma Sroka, M.D., Sally Dodds, Ph.D., & Patricia Lebensohn, M.D.

  2. Presentation Objectives • The objectives of this presentation are: • Recognize the steps in creating competency-based education including the evaluation methodology. • Understand program strategies used in incorporating a new curriculum into existing residency training. • Review key outcomes of courses completed and change in IMR medical knowledge. • Review individual program successes and challenges in implementation methodology.

  3. Integrative Medicine in Residency (IMR) is… • Competency-based, online, 200-hour, curriculum. • In-depth training in Integrative Medicine. • Incorporated through all 3 years of Family Medicine residency. • Piloted at 8 residencies nationwide. • Seamless, online evaluation of the curriculum and the residents. • Responds to ACGME competency requirements. • Evaluation developed simultaneously with the curriculum.

  4. Alaska Family Medicine IMR Program Locations Maine-Dartmouth Maine Medical Center Univ. of Minn Hennepin County University of Connecticut Beth Israel A. Einstein Montefiore Carolinas Medical Center Moses H. Cone University of Arizona University of Texas Medical Branch Control sites

  5. IMR Curriculum Units Prevention and Wellness Acute Care Tools in Integrative Medicine Women’s Health Pediatrics Chronic Illness

  6. Units and Courses • Pediatric Topics: • ADD/ADHD • Chronic Pain Syndrome • Asthma and Allergies • Women’s Health Topics: • PMS/PMDD • Dysmenorrhea • Menopause • Fibromyalgia • Osteoporosis • Depression • Eating Disorders • Pregnancy and Lactation • Chronic Illness: • Cardiovascular Disease • Type II Diabetes • Osteoarthritis • Rheumatoid Arthritis • Obesity • Irritable Bowel Syndrome • Chronic Back Pain • Special Topics: • HIV/AIDS • Cancer Survivorship • Environmental Medicine • Introduction to Integrative Medicine • Prevention and Wellness: • U.S. Preventive Health Services • Nutrition and Diet • Supplements for Prevention • Physical Activity • Sleep • Stress and Mind-Body Medicine • Spirituality • Clinical Integration • Tools in Integrative Medicine: • Integrative Medicine Intake and Care Plan • Botanicals • Mind-Body Medicine • Manual Medicine • Introduction to Energy Medicine and Whole Systems • Practice Management • Motivational Interviewing for Behavioral Change • Acute Care: • Acute Back Pain, • Urinary Tract Infection, • Gastroenteritis, • Otitis Media, • Vaginitis, • Atypical Chest Pain, • Upper Respiratory Infection

  7. IMR: Educational Methods • Needs assessment informed curriculum design. • Web-based curriculum written and edited by Integrative Medicine educators. • Competencies aligned with the ACGME Outcomes Project. • Flexible modular format to meet the needs of residency schedules. • Case-based, interactive learning and streaming video. • Experiential exercises and process-oriented group activities at the residency sites. • A community of learners through online dialogues with faculty and peers. • Emphasis on teaching and promoting physician well-being and self-care.

  8. IMR User Interface Reflections Flexible modular format Direct Observation Checklists Online portfolios Resources and Links

  9. What is Evaluated in the IMR? • Curriculum: • Residents evaluate each course after completion • Residents’ competencies: • Medical Knowledge test • Self Assessment • Direct Observation Checklist • Reflections • Residents’ wellness & well-being: • Behavioral assessments • Residency recruitment: • Match results and post match survey

  10. Yr 01 Course CompletionsClasses of 2011 and 2012 As of March 19, 2010

  11. Yr 02 Course CompletionsClass of 2011 As of March 19, 2010

  12. Clinical Utility of the Course?Year 01 Content *Currently, indicators are available for 4 courses for the 2012 class.

  13. Year 02 Course EvaluationsCourses currently at 50% threshold Meet Learning Objectives? Clinical Utility?

  14. Year 02 Course EvaluationsCourses currently at 50% threshold Smooth Online technology?

  15. Medical Knowledge TestMean percent correct at baseline – All groups ns

  16. Medical Knowledge TestSub group differences at baseline – Class of 2011 Sex Medical School Status

  17. Medical Knowledge TestPre-/Post Test Class of 2011 – Yr. 01

  18. Post Match1Match Results 2011, 2012, 2013

  19. Post Match2IM/CAM Medical School Courses &Personal Use Controls rated higher than 2012 group on all questions. * 2011 more required IM/CAM courses in medical school than 2012 (p<.001). * 2011 more electives in medical school than 2012 (p<.001). * Controls more electives than 2012 (p=.012). * 2011 more personal IM/CAM use than the 2012 group (p=.014). • 2011 (n=57) • (n=43) • Control (n=30)

  20. Post Match3Interest in Learning IM in Residency High interest in both the 2011 and 2012 groups. But, over half of the controls also had high interest. * 2011 group had a higher interest than controls (p=.002). • 2011 (n=57) • (n=43) • Control (n=30)

  21. Post Match4Importance of the IMR in Ranking Decision Very important/Important: 2011 – 53% 2012 – 37% Notes: 1. Likert scale revised to 5 points and accounts for differences in scores. 2. 2011 totals >100%– rounding error . • 2011 (n=57) • (n=43)

  22. Post Match5Interest in Applying IM in Practice High to moderate interest in both the 2011 and 2012 groups. Controls also had high to moderate interest. * 2011 group had higher interest in applying IM in practice than controls (p=.001). Notes: 1. 2011 totals more than 100%– rounding error • 2011 (n=57) • (n=43) • Control (n=30)

  23. Implementation Strategies • Individual activities: • Free blocks of time longitudinally • Use concentrated time in certain rotations (orientation, community medicine, integrative medicine, nursery). • Do content matched with rotations (e.g., outpatient pediatrics, maternal child health, GYN, EM) • Group activities: • Wellness and self care • Videos • Motivational interviewing • Mind-Body skills training • Integration with behavioral health program • Field trips • Yoga, tai chi • OMT skills • Nutrition lecture series • Integrative approach to lecture topics

  24. Implementation Challenges • Finding the time in the curriculum. • Motivating some residents to keep on track and progress through the curriculum. • Getting faculty interested in participating in the curriculum. • Incorporating an Integrative Medicine approach into busy outpatient care sessions.

  25. Implementation Successes • Most residents are progressing well through the curriculum. • Evaluations are very encouraging. • One sites from the 2011 class is requesting continued access to the curriculum after graduation. • The presence of the IMR attracts competitive residents to the pilot sites. • Residents’ medical knowledge has increased from Yr. 01 to Yr. o2. • Unknown: • Residents’ well-being • Patient centeredness • Patient outcomes • Practice patterns after graduation

  26. Next Steps • Complete the Yr. 03 content • Analyze Behavioral Assessments/residents’ well-being and compare with control groups • Expand to other programs • 5 early adopters in 2010 • Medical Center of Central Georgia, Macon, GA • Tufts University Family Medicine, Malden, MA • Aurora Family Medicine Residency Program, Milwaukee, WI; Research Family Medicine, Kansas City, MO; • Internal Medicine Residency University of New Mexico, Albuquerque NM. • Build a stand alone course on Prevention and Wellness for residents and medical students

  27. Discussion

  28. Teaching Strategies

More Related