1 / 11

Fundamental Environmentalism

Fundamental Environmentalism. By Machan and Chesher. Two Opposing Views from the Start. Environment is a deterministic system. Result of an evolutionary natural process. Human’s actions are part of the system. Human actions cannot change things. Environment depends on human actions.

gburritt
Download Presentation

Fundamental Environmentalism

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Fundamental Environmentalism By Machan and Chesher

  2. Two Opposing Views from the Start • Environment is a deterministic system. • Result of an evolutionary natural process. • Human’s actions are part of the system. • Human actions cannot change things. • Environment depends on human actions. • The popular ethical view. • Human actions do affect the environment.

  3. Two General Approaches, Assuming We CAN Affect the Environment . . . • Collectivist • If human life is lived most successfully in collectivist terms, then this is best approach. • Government control of resources. • Individualist • If human life is lived most successfully in individualist terms, then this is best approach. • Individual property rights are key.

  4. The Tragedy of the Commons • When resources are not owned privately, then there is an incentive to take the resource before others do. • In collectivist systems, individuals are not held responsible for how they use resources. • No moral guilt for wrongdoing because it is not clear whose property is being violated.

  5. Two Versions of A Big Question • Is a reduction in pollution worth the costs? • Why is it so often simply assumed that it is? • How do we know whether the decrease in pollution caused by some action is valued greater than the decrease in the value of output caused by the same action? • This is a huge question that is often simply ignored.

  6. When Resources are Privately Owned. . . • Pollution caused by others is a violation of property rights. • Owner feels the effect of his own degradation of his property. • Profit motive is an incentive for “wise” use.

  7. Policy Suggestions • Privatize all land, resources, etc. • Institute strong trespassing laws. • Avoid collectivization of resources.

  8. Is earning a profit at odds with a clean environment? • If resources are collectively “owned,” then yes, people will have incentives to use resources and pollute generally because they do not bear the full cost of doing so. • If resources are privately owned, then the answer is no, because profitability and a good environment are mutually reinforcing.

  9. Should firms “pollute”? • If we are talking about one’s own property. . . • His resources should be used to the extent that it generates the most net value. • Each firm should weigh the benefits of using the resources in certain ways with the costs. • The private nature of the resources, coupled with the profit motive, assures that the benefits will outweigh the costs.

  10. Should firms “pollute”? • If we are talking about collective property. . . • The profit motive and good “stewardship” are at odds, and so the firm must choose between one or the other. • So, there is no solid answer. • Morality is impossible under the collective assumption.

  11. Summary • Our authors are, not-surprisingly, strong on the importance of property rights being the foundation for good “environmentalism.” • If everything were privatized, as our authors desire, what would happen to the very word “environment.”

More Related