one year after brussels donor conference
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
ONE YEAR AFTER BRUSSELS DONOR CONFERENCE

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 15

ONE YEAR AFTER BRUSSELS DONOR CONFERENCE - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 67 Views
  • Uploaded on

ONE YEAR AFTER BRUSSELS DONOR CONFERENCE. TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL GEORGIA 20 OCTOBER 2009. PLEDGED AID (1). TOTAL AMOUNT 4.55 BLD USD – 1,000 USD PER PERSON 38 COUNTRIES AND 15 INSTITUTIONS 95% PLEDGED BY 13 DONORS – 7 COUNTRIES AND 6 INSTITUTIONS. PLEDGED AID (2).

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' ONE YEAR AFTER BRUSSELS DONOR CONFERENCE' - gauri


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
one year after brussels donor conference

ONE YEAR AFTER BRUSSELS DONOR CONFERENCE

TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL

GEORGIA

20 OCTOBER 2009

pledged aid 1
PLEDGED AID (1)
  • TOTAL AMOUNT 4.55 BLD USD – 1,000 USD PER PERSON
  • 38 COUNTRIES AND 15 INSTITUTIONS
  • 95% PLEDGED BY 13 DONORS – 7 COUNTRIES AND 6 INSTITUTIONS
pledged aid 2
PLEDGED AID (2)
  • BIGGEST COUNTRY DONOR US – 1 BLN USD
  • BIGGEST INSTITUTION DONOR – EBRD 927 MLN USD
  • MORE THAN ½ LOANS - CONCESSIONAL
pledged aid 3
PLEDGED AID (3)
  • SPENDING PRIORITIES:

DIRECT BUDGET SUPPORT

ENERGY

ROADS

MUNICIPAL INFRASTRUCTURE

IDPS

SOCIAL ASSISTANCE

AGRICULTURE

ENVIRONMENT

BANKING SECTOR

pledged aid 4
PLEDGED AID (4)
  • COMMITTED IN 2008: 795 MLN USD

403 MLN USD DIRECT BUDGET SUPPORT

MORE THAN HALF GRANTS

  • COMMITTED IN 2009: OVER 1.850 MLN USD

143 MLN USD DIRECT BUDGET SUPPORT

2/3 LOANS

pledged aid 5
PLEDGED AID (5)
  • US FUNDING:

250 MLN USD DIRECT BUDGET SUPPORT

60 MLN USD MCC (REGIONAL ROAD)

13 MLN USD (GAS STORAGE FACILITY)

26 MLN USD (REG. INFRASTRUCTURE)

100 MLN USD (STABILIZATION/RECONSTR)

1 MLN USD MCC (ADMINISTRATIVE)

53.3 MLN USD (ECONOMIC SUPPORT)

242 MLN USD (ECONOMY, PEACE, GOVERN)

176 MLN USD OPIC (BUSINESS SUPPORT)

positive developments 1
POSITIVE DEVELOPMENTS (1)
  • ESSENTIAL SUPPORT: POLITICAL, FISCAL AND ECONOMIC (FDI DROP TO 20%)
  • 53% ALREADY COMMITTED
  • FUNDING HELPED TO MAINTAIN ECONOMIC ACTIVITY, REDUCE BUDGET DEFICIT, PAY SALARIES/PENSIONS, STRENGTHEN BANKING SECTOR
positive developments 2
POSITIVE DEVELOPMENTS (2)
  • TRANSPARENT AID BREAKDOWN (MINISTRY OF FINANCE DATABASES POSTED ON INTERNET)
  • COOPERATION WITH THE MINISTRY OF FINANCE (REGULAR MEETINGS WITH GEORGIAN NGOS)
  • TRANSPARENT MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT FUND PROJECTS BREAKDOWN (ONE OF THE CHIEF IMPLEMENTORS)
positive developments 3
POSITIVE DEVELOPMENTS (3)
  • SOME GOVERNMENT AGENCIES RESPONDING TO CRITICISM
  • NGOS AND MEDIA MONITORING AID
  • IDP ASSISTANCE MORE COMPREHENSIVE AND LONG-TERM
concerns to date 1
CONCERNS TO DATE (1)
  • DOMINANCE OF POLITICS (OPPOSITION REFUSAL TO ENGAGE IN THE ANTI-CRISIS COUNCIL ACTIVITIES)
  • WEAK DEMOCRACY
  • LACK OF POLITICAL CONDITIONS
  • LACK OF PARTICIPATORY PROCESS OF AID DISTRIBUTION DECISION-MAKING
concerns to date 2
CONCERNS TO DATE (2)
  • POOR PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE OF AND UNDERSTANDING OF SPENDING PRIORITIES
  • SPEEDY PROCESS AND INSUFFICIENT PLANNING
  • WEAK OVERSIGHT INSTITUTIONS
  • AID NOT ALWAYS TIED TO CAPACITY BUILDING
concerns to date 3
CONCERNS TO DATE (3)
  • NOT ENOUGH EMPHASIS ON QUALITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT
  • INSUFFICIENT SUPPORT OF NGO MONITORING EFFORTS
  • LACK OF SUFFICIENT DONOR TRANSPARENCY
concerns to date 4
CONCERNS TO DATE (4)
  • TWO-WAY COMMUNICATION
  • PROGRESS ASSESSMENT AND GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY
  • FORMALIZED PROCESS
recommendations 1
RECOMMENDATIONS (1)
  • POLITICAL CONDITIONS: MEASURABLE AND PUBLIC
  • TRANSPARENCY OF FUNDING DECISION-MAKING / CLEAR JUSTIFICATION
  • COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF IMPLEMENTING AGENCIES AND OVERSIGHT MECHANISMS
recommendations 2
RECOMMENDATIONS (2)
  • BETTER PLANNING AND COMMUNICATION
  • MORE EMPHASIS ON QUALITY ASSESSMENT
  • SUPPORTING MONITORING ACTIVITIES
  • INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY MECHANISMS
  • BETTER DONOR TRANSPARENCY
ad