1 / 23

ORGANISING.

ORGANISING. ORGANISING. TO DESIGN AND MAINTAIN A SYSTEM OF ROLES IS THE MANAGERIAL FUNCTION OF ORGANISING TO BE MEANINGFUL, IT MUST INCLUDE VERIFIABLE OBJECTIVES, A CLEAR CONCEPT OF MAJOR DUTIES AND/OR ACTIVITIES AND CLARITY OF AUTHORITY. ORGANISING.

gatesj
Download Presentation

ORGANISING.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ORGANISING.

  2. ORGANISING.. • TO DESIGN AND MAINTAIN A SYSTEM OF ROLES IS THE MANAGERIAL FUNCTION OF ORGANISING • TO BE MEANINGFUL, IT MUST INCLUDE VERIFIABLE OBJECTIVES, A CLEAR CONCEPT OF MAJOR DUTIES AND/OR ACTIVITIES AND CLARITY OF AUTHORITY

  3. ORGANISING.. • IS A GROUPING OF ACTIVITIES NECESSARY TO ATTAIN OBJECTIVES • ASSIGNING OF EACH GROUPING TO A MANAGER WITH THE AUTHORITY NECESSARY TO SUPERVISE IT • PROVISION FOR CO-ORDINATION HORIZONTALLY AND VERTICALLY WITHIN THE ORGANISATION

  4. ORGANISING.. • ORGANISATION STRUCTURE SHOULD BE DESIGNED TO CLARIFY THE ENVIRONMENT SO THAT EVERYONE KNOWS WHO IS TO DO WHAT, WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WHAT RESULTS , TO REMOVE OBSTACLES TO PERFORMANCE CAUSED BY CONFUSION AND UNCERTAINITY OF ASSIGNMENT AND TO FURNISH DECISION MAKING COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK REFLECTING AND SUPPORTING ENTERPRISE OBJECTIVES

  5. FORMAL ORGANISATION • BARNARD DEFINED FORMAL ORGANISATIONS AS A SET OF INTERACTIONS OF TWO OR MORE PEOPLE WHO WERE CONCIOUSLY AND CO-ORDINATEDLY MOVING TOWARDS A GIVEN OBJECTIVE

  6. FORMAL ORG.. • FORMAL ORGANISATIONS ARE FORMED WHEN: • 1 PERSONS ARE ABLE TO COMMUNICATE • 2. ARE WILLING TO ACT • 3. SHARE A PURPOSE

  7. PRINCIPLE OF UNITY OF OBJECTIVE • AN ORGANISATION STRUCTURE IS EFFECTIVE IF IT FACILITATES THE CONTRIBUTION OF INDIVIDUALS IN THE ATTAINMENT OF ENTERPRISE OBJECTIVES

  8. PRINCIPLE OF EFFICIENCY • AN ORGANISATION STRUCTURE IS EFFICIENT IF IT FACILITATES ACCOMPLISHMENT OF OBJECTIVES WITH THE MINIMUM UNSOUGHT CONSEQUENCES OR COSTS.

  9. INFORMAL ORGANISATION • BARNARD DEFINED INFORMAL ORGANISATION AS ANY JOINT PERSONAL ACTIVITY WITHOUT CONSCIOUS JOINT PURPOSE , EVEN THOUGH POSSIBLY CONTRIBUTING TO JOINT RESULTS.

  10. INFORMAL ORG… • TYPES:- A) KINSHIP-FRIENDSHIP GROUPS B) CLIQUES C) SUB-CLIQUES • PURPOSE OF INFORMAL ORGANISATION

  11. ORGANISING AS A PROCESS • WHY IS ORGANISING A PROCESS? • BASIC ORGANISING QUESTIONS

  12. SPAN OF MANAGEMENT • WHAT ARE ORGANISATION LEVELS? • WHAT IS SPAN OF MGMT? • SPAN SIMPLY MEANS THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE A MANAGER CAN SUPERVISE

  13. SPAN OF MGMT… • HOW WIDE SHOULD A SPAN BE? • WHAT ARE THE PROBLEMS WITH LEVELS?

  14. FACTORS DETERMINING AN EFFECTIVE SPAN.. • SUBORDINATE TRAINING • CLARITY OF DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY • CLARITY OF PLANS • RATE OF CHANGE • USE OF OBJECTIVE STANDARDS • COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUES • AMOUNT OF PERSONAL CONTACT

  15. WIDE Vs NARROW SPAN • NARROW

  16. NARROW SPAN.. • ADVANTAGES:- • CLOSE SUPERVISION • CLOSE CONTROL • FASTER COMMUNICATION BETWEEN SUBORDINATES AND SUPERIORS

  17. NARROW SPAN.. • DISADVANTAGES:- • SUPERIORS TEND TO GET TOO INVOLVED IN SUBORDINATES WORK • MANY LEVELS OF MANAGEMENT • HIGH COSTS DUE TO MANY LEVELS • EXCESSIVE DISTANCE BETWEEN LOWEST AND TOP LEVEL

  18. WIDE SPAN..

  19. WIDE SPAN • ADVANTAGES:- 1.SUPERIORS ARE FORCED TO DELEGATE 2.CLEAR POLICIES MUST BE MADE 3. SUBORDINATES MUST BE CLEARLY SELECTED

  20. WIDE SPAN. • DISADVANTAGES:- • TENDENCY TO OVERLOAD SUPERIORS TO BECOME DECISION BOTTLENECKS • DANGER OF SUPERIOR’S LOSS OF CONTROL • REQUIRES EXCEPTIONAL QUALITY OF MANAGERS

  21. WHICH IS BETTER? • THE SEARS ROEBUCK STUDY • THE UNDERLYING VARIABLES APPROACH • SIMILARITY OF FUNCTION • GEOGRAPHICAL CONTIGUITY • COMPLEXITY OF FUNCTIONS • DIRECTION AND CONTROL • CO-ORDINATION • PLANNING

  22. PRINCIPLE OF SPAN OF MANAGEMENT • THERE IS A LIMIT IN EACH MANAGERIAL POSITION TO THE NUMBER OF PERSONS AN INDIVIDUAL CAN EFFECTIVELY MANAGE, BUT THE EXACT NUMBER IN EACH CASE WILL VARY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE EFFECT OF UNDERLYING VARIABLES AND THEIR IMPACT ON THE TIME REQUIREMENTS OF EFFECTIVE MANAGING.

  23. THE END.

More Related