Ps to sps beam transfer studies
Download
1 / 22

PS-to-SPS Beam Transfer Studies - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 89 Views
  • Uploaded on

PS-to-SPS Beam Transfer Studies. Helga Timkó BE-RF-BR in collaboration with Theodoros Argyropoulos , Thomas Bohl, Heiko Damerau , Steven Hancock, Juan Esteban Müller, Elena Shaposhnikova. Outline. Motivation for the beam transfer studies Earlier Today Measurement results

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' PS-to-SPS Beam Transfer Studies' - gaston


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Ps to sps beam transfer studies

PS-to-SPSBeam Transfer Studies

Helga Timkó

BE-RF-BR

in collaborationwith

Theodoros Argyropoulos, Thomas Bohl, Heiko Damerau, Steven Hancock, Juan Esteban Müller, Elena Shaposhnikova


Outline
Outline

  • Motivation for the beam transfer studies

    • Earlier

    • Today

  • Measurement results

    • Why we did not understand them

  • A few highlights of our simulation results

    • Explaining past observations

    • New ideas for optimisation

  • On-going work

LIU-SPS WG on Beam loss…



Motivation for the transfer studies earlier
Motivation for the transfer studies – Earlier…

  • A few years ago still, losses were very high

    • Typically around 10-20 %

  • The currently operational SPS flat-bottom (FB) scheme and many other settings were optimised through these studies

2004

Nominal LHC intensity (~1.1-1.3  1011 ppb), 25 ns

Up to 40 % losses!!

E. Shaposhnikova et al.: Capture loss of the LHC beam in the CERN SPS


As a function of intensity
…as a function of intensity…

  • Losses increase significantly with intensity  will be a problem in future

  • Why do losses increase with intensity?

    • Higher intensity  εL  more losses

    • Beam loading  deformation of bucket  more losses

Losses increase with bunch intensity

J. Esteban Müller

LIU-SPS WG on Beam loss…


And today
…and today

  • Today, losses are down to ~5 % for nominal intensity (due to scrubbing)

    • When we’ll increase intensity, losses will be significant again

    • The SPS bucket is already very full at injection

  • Would like to use a larger εL, which is good for

    • Stability in the PS & SPS

    • Higher intensity beam – planned for future LHC operation

  • The PS has been upgraded many times over the past 50 years and will be pushed to its limits with the future intensity requirements

    • Minimising the losses in the injector chain is essential in order to deliver the required intensity to the LHC!


Previous measurements

PS-TO-SPS TRANSFER:

Previous measurements


Mds 25 ns and 50 ns beam
MDs: 25 ns and 50 ns beam

  • 50 ns: 4th July 2011

  • 25 ns: 7th November 2011

  • Transmission didn’t improve using 900 kV for the bunch rotation in the PS

But the transmission stays the same

Bunch length does down when 900 kV is applied

LIU-SPS WG on Beam loss…


Simulation highlights

PS-TO-SPS TRANSFER:

Simulation Highlights


Our model
Our model

  • In our simulations, we use

    • Real, averaged phase-space distributions of the bunches

      • From tomography measurements at the PS FT

    • Real voltage programmes in PS and SPS

    • Single bunch simulations, no intensity effects have been taken into account


Emittance blow up
Emittance blow-up

  • There is an emittance blow-up (due to the synchronisation loop) in the PS  included also in the simulations

Measured bunch lengths are shorter than the simulated

LIU-SPS WG on Beam loss…


Simulating the 50 ns case
Simulating the 50 ns case

  • Transmission measured at SPS FB, before the acceleration

    • V200 MHz = 2 MV, V800 MHz = 0.34 MV in bunch-shortening mode

  • Reproduce exp. results when emittance blow-up is added

Bunch lengths are matched by ε blow-up

Transmission becomes very realistic

LIU-SPS WG on Beam loss…


So why is the transmission not improved
So, why is the transmission not improved?

  • There is no improvement with larger voltage, because

    • Bunches have a particular shape and

    • Buckets are very full;

  • To improve the transmission, need to improve the shape

LIU-SPS WG on Beam loss…


Ps rotation timing
PS rotation timing

  • However, in the MDs above we adjusted only t80 MHz

  • t40 MHz = 150 μs was kept the same for both 600 kV and 900 kV cases

SPS

LIU-SPS WG on Beam loss…


Optimisation studies

PS-TO-SPS TRANSFER:

OPTIMISATION STUDIES


Optimising the bunch rotation
Optimising the bunch rotation

  • For 1+2 cavities, optimal timing reduces losses: 4.4 %  3.5 %

  • Using 2+3 cavities instead of 1+2:

    3.5 %  1.3 %

  • N.B. only t40 MHzis optimised based on transmission, t80 MHz is optimised based on bunch length

Current operational point

LIU-SPS WG on Beam loss…


Optimised bunch shapes
Optimised bunch shapes

… now improved:

tails less populated

LIU-SPS WG on Beam loss…


Effect on transmission
Effect on transmission

  • With optimised timing and 900 kV in the PS:

    • Losses are reduced, despite having longer bunches

Transmission is considerably improved

LIU-SPS WG on Beam loss…


Sps capture voltage
SPS capture voltage

  • Using the SPSvoltage &momentum programme for the acceleration ramp, we simulated injection & acceleration:

Capture + FB losses

Capture + FB + acceleration ramp losses

  • 23 MV has 3-4 % better transmission than 3 MV

  • No difference between 2 MV and 23 MV is seen in our sims

  • 23 MV stands for: 2 MV at batch injections, 3 MV in-between injections

LIU-SPS WG on Beam loss…


Ongoing mds

PS-TO-SPS TRANSFER:

ONGOING MDS


Verification of our results
Verification of our results

  • 2012-03-29 MD: optimising the PS bunch rotation timing

    • Preliminary results, need further measurements (beam conditions were changing)

Currently operational

Optimum in simulations


Conclusions outlook
Conclusions & outlook

  • Earlier, transmission was not improved with V80 MHz,PS= 900 kV, due to the ‘S-shape’ of the bunch and a full SPS bucket

  • Bunch shape has to be optimised during the PS rotation

  • Simulations predict a gain of a few % by optimising the PS bunch rotation timing

    • First MD results are encouraging

  • The SPS FB voltage influences the losses in the beginning of the acceleration ramp

  • We can expect significant increase in losses for higher emittances (intensities)

    • Simulations including intensity effects are planned

LIU-SPS WG on Beam loss…


ad