E N D
1. Contemporary Border Challenges
5. US-Mexico Border as region Formal region as legal boundary between US and Mexico
Functional region wherein current issues define and redefine the region
industrialization and urbanization
immigration and labor issues
drug trafficking and interdiction efforts
environmental impacts of all of the above
6. US-Mexico immigration issues Literal clash of developing and developed countries and cultures on the border
Huge wage and employment differences
Desires for family reunification
Legitimate issues of political asylum
Realization of spatial negative externalities of immigration impacts
7. Ideas to resolve issues Guest worker policy with temporary stays
Effective development policies in Mexico
Realization of spatial externalities of impacts and policies to address them
Command and control policies that are argued to lead towards criminalization of migrants
Potential of education and realization of different perspectives involved
IRCA legislation of 1986 and other laws
8. North American Common Market Vicente Fox idea floated in summer of 2000
Realizing the realities of border migration, economic integration and geography
Major elements include
Open borders with free movement of migration
Some form of continental minimum wage
Implied guarantee of employment
Realistic idea, useful straw person or ????
9. Destabilization of las drogas Drug traffic and trade in Mexico truly threatens the stability of the state
Narco-terrorists engaging in widespread murder and assassination
Widespread corruption at the highest levels of government, as well as “on the line”
Destination in the US is inescapable fact
Demand is alive and well in the US
Movement through Mexico and across border has major impacts on region
10. Impacts of drug trafficking Heightened danger in Mexican border cities - Tijuana & Guadalajara shootouts
Militarization of the border under guise of “security issues”
argument is quite valid in Mexico, as evidenced by violence and Army roadblocks
critiques exist concerning US sphere, due to different impacts in the US
Overall, one of most difficult issues on border, threatening both sides
12. Border environment as issue At best, historically seen as background against which events/processes occurred
Last 15 years have seen US and Mexico increase formal and informal efforts
Formal efforts include many agreements
General framework of La Paz Agreement of 1983
Integrated Border Environmental Plan (IBEP)s
NAFTA side accords - “greener” trade and development
Border XXI - broader environmental frame
13. Current “score” on environment Recent efforts are major improvement with many new and creative options
Adequate laws/regs exist on both sides
Mixed results and effectiveness both across and along the border
Extremely active policy & research area
Much yet to be done with great potential for exciting work
14. Some ideas for solving problems Regional & geographic approaches
The nature of twin or sister cities
Watershed councils and other ecosystem and bio-regional approaches
The importance of learning both about and from “The Other Side”; lessons from Pastor and Castañeda
15. Formal environmental agreements La Paz Agreement for the Protection and Improvement of the Border Environment
federal consensus on importance of issue
established important working groups
sets USEPA/SEDUE as primary agents
NAFTA side accords
1st trade accord with active environment role
Border Environment Cooperation Commission
North American Development Bank
Commission on Environmental Cooperation
16. IBEP and Border XXI Integrated Border Environment Plan
joint US-Mexican blueprint for environment
built on La Paz workgroups
extensive criticisms voiced by the public
Border XXI - an attempt to improve IBEP
more open public participation through
regional border liaison offices in TX and CA
calls for regional and bio-regional plans
better effort but jury still out on overall impact
17. The Environmental Institutions USEPA and SEMARNAP/SEMARNAT
US and Federal environmental protection agencies with primacy in border environment
NAFTA agencies - BECC and NADBank
Border Environment Cooperation Commission
Technical support and NADBANK certication
Much promise, as well as some problems and issues
NADBank is binational development bank
Primarily loans funds for infrastructure projects
Internal problems and lack of experience in Mexico for public agency financing exist
18. International Boundary & Water Commission US and Mexican sections exist (IBWC/CILA)
1944 Water Treaty gave primacy to IBWC for water resource & boundary issues on border
Technically and hierarchically oriented
Tends to be highly reactive to problems
Heritage for operating without transparency
Limited input for public participation
Recent changes offer optimism
Yet agency is still fairly old guard in view
19. Most recent developments USEPA and SEMARNAT recently released the “Border 2012 Program” draft document
Renewal of sorts of the Border XXI Document that ended in 2000/2001
Strongly highlights need for public participation and transparency in operations
Changes focus from topical work groups to regionally based work groups
Stronger role for states rights and state participation
20. Border 2012 specifics Preliminary plan is very short on details and specifics
Regional focus is interesting variation, as is increasing role of the states
Numerous questions exist with respect to specifics
What of existing work groups?
What of previous areas of focus?
What of linkages to BECC, NADBank ,and IBWC?
Plan raises as many if not more questions than it answers
21. Regional & geographic approaches Border is a region, NOT just a line
Geographic realities of location of Washington & Mexico City (tell us what?)
Fabric and inter-relationships of border residents are very key
more closely linked to those on “the other side” than own state and federal capitals
local/regional efforts more likely to work
Above argues for regional approaches
22. What about these sister cities? Herzog (1990 and 1991) introduces the transboundary metropolis as planning tool (have them read this)
Degree of linkage argues for valuable regional knowledge and interconnections
Demonstrated potential includes
San Diego-Tijuana Sister Cities Programs
El Paso/Ciudad Juarez linkages & cooperation
Yet significant obstacles and barriers exist
23. Bio-regional approaches What is an ecoregion/bioregion?
region of relative homogeneity of ecological systems or relationships between organisms and their environments
Approach recognizes bio-physical integrity of regions & processes involved
Also recognizes that problems may be best solved by working in these regions
Two examples are watersheds and airsheds
24. Bio-regional approaches Watershed is geographic region within which water, sediments and dissolved materials drain into a common outlet
Shared border basins & co-occurrence of twin cites make watersheds attractive
Watershed councils are logical step
Demonstrated potential includes
Border Liaison Mechanism& Border Water Council in San Diego region
Paseo del Norte Regional Air Quality efforts
25. Consejos de cuencas or watershed councils US opportunities and background
Openings within USEPA and Border XXI
Colorado River & Río Bravo/Río Grande compacts
Mexican opportunities of Comisión Nacional del Agua and la Ley Nacional del Agua
Call for consejos de cuencas
Lays out user organization and participation
los usuarios provide voices for multiple users
26. Early history of los consejos Limited experience of Consejo del Río Lerma as domestic Mexican consejo
Recent successes in San Diego/Tijuana region
Efforts of SANDAG and Committee on Binational Regional Opportunities (COBRO)
Border Water Council = regional instrument with joint federal support
Council demonstrates potential of Consejos de cuencas
27. Understanding the “other side” What are Pastor’s ideas for understanding?
Listening is important first step, listening to: importance of oil, NA trading linkages, & the importance of Mexican-Americans to the US
Communicating is crucial to understanding, it is more than listening
Catch 22 of dependency relationship
need to also acknowledge inter-dependency
problems realistically assessing US role
28. Understanding the “other side” What are Castañeda ’s ideas?
US influence on Mexico is much too great!
Mexico must look south to Latin America, not north to the US.
Yet, realities of geography are what they are.
Need for nationalism in Mexico is changing.
Mexico’s resentment of the US and resiliency of political system are underestimated.
US cannot solve Mexico’s problems; only Mexico can.
29. Understanding the “other side” What ideas do Pastor and Castañeda share in this regard?
At first reading of their intros….not many!
Different histories, different perspectives yield different “answers”
Yet….listening, communicating, learning, and understanding do seem shared ideas
What do you think?
30. Border images