290 likes | 499 Views
3/27/2012. History- How did we get to this point?. High School renovation 10 years ago 9th gradeMiddle School renovation project 6 years ago Elementary building plan, completion this summerMarsh, Pine, Lake HillsEastport opening 3 years agoNot a long-term PK solutionNew buildings were built
E N D
1. Michigan City Area SchoolsRedistricting Community Forums March 25 – April 1, 2009
2. 3/28/2012 History - How did we get to this point? High School renovation 10 years ago – 9th grade
Middle School renovation project 6 years ago
Elementary building plan, completion this summer
Marsh, Pine, Lake Hills
Eastport opening 3 years ago
Not a long-term PK solution
New buildings were built with capacity for PK
3. 3/28/2012 Committee Members Parents
Coolspring, Edgewood, Joy, Knapp, Marsh, Lake Hills, Niemann, Pine, Springfield, Krueger, Barker, Elston, Eastport, Special Ed
Community Members (5)
Organizations
Boys and Girls Club, Housing Authority, HOPE, City Council, City Hall, MCAS School Board, MCEA, MCEEA
Principals
Two Elementary, Three Middle
Central Office
Mario Rosa, Sarah Fine, Kevin McGuire, Kevin Neafie
4. 3/28/2012 Process Meeting 1
Set guidelines for new boundaries
Meeting 2
Split into groups, created boundaries based on z-map
Meeting 3
Kevin2 combined workable features of the 4 group maps to create one beginning scenario for the group to discuss
Meeting 4
“Plan A” was discussed and “Plans B and C” were drafted
Meeting 5
“Plan B” and “Plan C” discussed
5. 3/28/2012 Guidelines Minimize student movement
Buildings that reflect district’s demographics
Free/Reduced Lunch
Ethnicity
Special Education
Transportation
Average distance from home to school
6. 3/28/2012 Guidelines Cont. Spatial Equality
No carts, no closets
Art, Music, 2 Computer Labs
Family Resource Rooms
Building Enrollment Capacities
Based on 25 students/classroom after spatial equality
Program Equity
Special Education
After School Programs
7. 3/28/2012 NCLB Score Card
8. 3/28/2012 8
9. 3/28/2012 9
10. 3/28/2012 Current Elementary Boundaries
11. 3/28/2012 Current Middle School Boundaries
12. 3/28/2012 Elementary Plan A
13. 3/28/2012 Plan A Pros
Low student movement
Average distance lowest
Cons
Lack spatial equality
Is not reflective of the community
Building capacities are not equal
14. 3/28/2012 Elementary Plan B
15. 3/28/2012 Plan B Pros
Low student movement
Enrollments balance
Average distance lowest
Spatial equality better, but still issue at Coolspring Cons
Coolspring and Springfield do not reflect community
16. 3/28/2012 Elementary Plan C
17. 3/28/2012 Plan C Pros
All buildings reflect the community
Enrollments Balance
Average distance better than current
Spatial equality at all buildings Cons
Highest student movement of three plans
18. 3/28/2012 18
19. 3/28/2012 19
20. 3/28/2012 20
21. 3/28/2012 21
22. 3/28/2012 22
23. 3/28/2012 23
24. 3/28/2012 Middle School Plans Guidelines were set the same, except:
Look at feeder system
Split as few 5th grades as possible
25. 3/28/2012 Middle School Plan A
26. 3/28/2012 Middle School Plan B
27. 3/28/2012 Middle School Plan C
28. 3/28/2012 28
29. 3/28/2012 29
30. 3/28/2012 Next Steps Website – Community Comments and Info
Community Forums
Local Media
April 13th, Board Work Session
Board Presentation - First Reading April 14th