Language preview
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 30

Language Preview PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 66 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Language Preview. Chapter 1. Human Language Specialization. Origin of Language: Theories. Divine Gift Monogenetic theory Human Invention Echoic (imitative) Cries of nature Rhythmical grunts Love songs Evolution of Linguistic Capacity Anatomical Neurological. Creative System.

Download Presentation

Language Preview

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Language preview

Language Preview

Chapter 1


Human language specialization

Human Language Specialization


Origin of language theories

Origin of Language: Theories

  • Divine Gift

    • Monogenetic theory

  • Human Invention

    • Echoic (imitative)

    • Cries of nature

    • Rhythmical grunts

    • Love songs

  • Evolution of Linguistic Capacity

    • Anatomical

    • Neurological


Creative system

Creative System

  • Infinity of language

    • Grammar

      • Pull the boat onto the beach

      • ______ the boat

    • Word formation

      • New word: “Soleme”

      • Having the properties of Soleme = “_______”

      • Created in the process of “_____________”


Infiniteness

Infiniteness

  • Human language makes infinite use of finite means.

    • The pink dog wanted a red balloon.

    • ?Colorless green ideas sleep furiously.


Recursive rules

Recursive Rules

  • This is the house that Jack built.

  • This is the cheese that sat in the house…

  • This is the rat that ate the cheese that…

  • This is that cat that killed the rat that…

  • This is the dog that chased the cat…


Key point

Key Point

  • Speakers of any language can understand and produce sentences they’ve never heard before.

  • You tell me…a sentence you’ve never heard before


Ambiguity

Ambiguity

  • The man saw the fish with binoculars.

  • You tell me… John yelled “Duck”…


Grammatical or not

Grammatical or not…?

  • The fish is swimming.

  • *Fish the swimming is.

  • ?Swimming is the fish.

  • *The fishing is swim.

  • He saw two dogs.

  • *He saw twos dog.


Japanese

Japanese

  • watashi-wa inu-ga mimashita I (subject) dog (object) saw(I saw a dog)

  • *mimashita inu-ga watashi-wa (saw) dog (object) I (subject)

  • watashi-ga inu-wa mimashita I (object) dog (subject) saw(A dog saw me)


Grammatical or not1

Grammatical or Not?

  • John kissed the little old lady who owned the shaggy dog.

  • Who owned the shaggy dog John kissed the little old lady.


Grammatical or not2

Grammatical or Not?

  • John is difficult to love.

  • It is difficult to love John.


Grammatical or not3

Grammatical or Not?

  • John is anxious to go.

  • It is anxious to go John.


You tell me

You Tell Me

  • Grammatical/ungrammatical pairs


Linguistic competence

Linguistic Competence

  • Internal/Innate grammar

    • Phonetics

    • Phonology

    • Morphology

    • Syntax

    • Lexicography

    • Semantics

    • Pragmatics

      …more details coming at the end of the chapter…


Linguistic competency

Linguistic Competency

  • Sound System

    • Phonetics

    • Phonology

  • Words

    • Form + meaning ≈ Arbitrary relationship

    • Sound Symbolism  onomatopoeia


Competence vs performance

Competence vs. Performance

  • Linguistic Competence

    • Knowing

    • Mental grammar

  • Linguistic Performance

    • Doing


Grammatical principles

Grammatical Principles

  • Generality

  • Parity

  • Universality

  • Mutability

  • Inaccessibility


Grammatical or ungrammatical

Grammatical or Ungrammatical?

He ain’t got none.

  • For Descriptive Linguistics:

    “Ungrammatical” means a native speaker would not have a reasonable expectation that the intended message will be understood


Dialect

Dialect…


On final prepositions

On final prepositions…

  • It is a rule up with which we should not put. - Winston Churchill


Prove or disprove

Language is systematic and rule-governed.

Language is generative (has creative potential).

Language is a set of arbitrary symbols.

The symbols have conventionalized meanings

The symbols are primarily vocal.

Language is essentially human.

Language is used for communication.

Language operates in a speech community or culture.

Language is acquired by all people in much the same way; language acquisition and language learning both have universal characteristics.

Language changes.

Prove or Disprove…


Grammar

Grammar

“the system of operations for creating an indefinite number of sentences out of a finite number of elements”


Components of grammar

Components of Grammar

  • phonetic system

    • the sounds of the language

  • phonological system

    • the sound patterns of the language

  • lexical system

    • the words or vocabulary of the language

  • morphological system

    • the patterns of word formation of language

  • syntactic system

    • the structure of sentences of the language

  • semantic system

    • the meanings of words and sentences of the language

  • pragmatic system

    • how the language is used in the context of spoken discourse


Two views of language

Two Views of Language

  • Noam Chomsky

    • Focus on ideal situation

      • Homogeneous speech community

      • Competence = performance

  • Dell Hymes

    • Focus on real people

      • Speech community is critical

      • Competence ≠ Performance


Noam chomsky

Noam Chomsky

“Linguistic theory is concerned primarily with an ideal speaker-listener, in a completely homogeneous speech-community, who knows its language perfectly and is unaffected by such grammatically irrelevant conditions as memory limitation, distractions, shifts of attention and interest, and errors in applying his [/her] knowledge of the language in actual performance.”


Dell hymes

Dell Hymes

“A child from whom any and all of the grammatical sequences of a language might come with equal likelihood would be, of course, a social monster. Within the social matrix in which it acquires a system of grammar, a child acquires also a system of its use regarding persons, places, purposes, other modes of communication, etc.--all the components of the communicative events, together with attitudes and beliefs regarding them. There also develop patterns of the sequential use of language in conversation, address, standard routines, and the like. In such acquisition resides the child’s sociolinguistic competence (or more broadly, communicative competence), its ability to participate in its society as not only a speaking but also a communicating member.”


You tell me1

You tell me…

  • If you had to choose between Chomsky & Hymes’ approaches, who would you support?

  • Is there a value in combining &/or balancing the two approaches?


Teaching grammar

Teaching Grammar

  • Prestige dialect…

  • Second language instruction…


For tomorrow

For “tomorrow”

  • Exercises

    • 1-6 – All

    • (they’re easy)

  • Read Chapter 2

  • Bring a small hand mirror to class


  • Login