1 / 18

Quality Assurance and Accessible Training 2

Quality Assurance and Accessible Training 2. Project No: LLP-LdV-TOI-2007-UK-065. Research Results. Stakeholder Research Sample - 184 persons. Stakeholder Sample - Gender. Stakeholder Sample – Experience of Disability. None 177 A specific learning difficulty e.g. dyslexia 1

gareth-boone
Download Presentation

Quality Assurance and Accessible Training 2

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Quality Assurance and Accessible Training 2 Project No: LLP-LdV-TOI-2007-UK-065

  2. Research Results

  3. Stakeholder Research Sample - 184 persons

  4. Stakeholder Sample - Gender

  5. Stakeholder Sample – Experience of Disability None 177 A specific learning difficulty e.g. dyslexia 1 Blind or partially sighted 3 Disability, special need or medical condition that is not listened 2 Don’t answer 1 Stakeholder Sample - Disability VET: 184 Adult and VET: 56

  6. The stakeholders were asked to complete a 5 point scale to answer the questions; 5 = very often, 1 = never

  7. Whole Class Activity

  8. Small Group Activities

  9. Individual Activities(1)

  10. Individual Activities(2)

  11. Number of Stakeholders who have taught students with disabilities

  12. Stakeholders have experience of teaching students with the following disabilities:

  13. Number of stakeholders who have made adjustments to practice to meet the needs of students with disabilities

  14. The types of adjustments made:

  15. The Stakeholders felt that the following activities would be easiest to change/adapt

  16. The stakeholders indicated which disabilities they would feel most confident supporting

  17. Some of the differences between the partner countries: The level of achievement for people with disabilities The kind of support available for disabled students within educational institutions The kind of activities that teachers/trainers adopt in the classroom The belief that disabled students have in the educational system Teachers’ and trainers’ level of experience in teaching disabled students

  18. Thank you

More Related