why the present shielding plan was abandoned
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Why the Present Shielding Plan was Abandoned.

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 6

Why the Present Shielding Plan was Abandoned. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 80 Views
  • Uploaded on

Why the Present Shielding Plan was Abandoned. Radiation levels in the area of the collimators meant that it would require several crews to complete the shielding job.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Why the Present Shielding Plan was Abandoned.' - gamada


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
why the present shielding plan was abandoned
Why the Present Shielding Plan was Abandoned.
  • Radiation levels in the area of the collimators meant that it would require several crews to complete the shielding job.
  • The awkwardness of location made it likely that the beam pipe or bellows would be damaged – particularly if we had multiple crews trying to work quickly.
  • The existing design did not allow for servicing of the motors, LVDT’s, or vacuum flanges without unacceptable radiation exposure.
  • There was no provision for the eventual removal of the system.
  • Conclusion: Remove collimators and do it right.
conceptual design of collimator
Conceptual Design of Collimator
  • Integrate collimator and enough shielding for at least twice present Booster flux at 1% high field scraping into a movable system which can be assembled externally and installed quickly (~ 1 day)
  • Design must include a clear plan to scale up to the full shielding (MiniBooNE+NuMI @ 2% scraping).
  • After extended operation at full flux:
    • There must be a reasonable method for servicing the motors and LVDT’s.
    • There must be a reasonable plan to remove the central collimation system (“coffin”) in the event of a catastrophic failure (e.g. vacuum leak).
    • There must be a reasonable plan to remove the entire system in the event Santa brings us a new Booster.
some ground rules
Some Ground Rules
  • No “quick and dirty” temporary solutions. What goes in, stays in.
  • No partial designs. Nothing goes in until we have a clear plan for the whole system.
some desirable features
Some Desirable Features
  • Use existing mover system, if reasonable.
  • Use as much of the steel as reasonable.
basic design choices
Basic Design Choices
  • Movable collimator inside a central coffin, all on rolling cart, around which full shielding could later be placed (Larry’s “11th hour solution”).
  • Bed of steel placed down first, central collimation system placed on top ( how ?)
  • Collimator fixed inside central shielding steel. Entire assembly is moved.
slide6
Goal
  • Settle on broad features of design, and move ahead.
  • Peter Kasper will be in charge of the project (I will cover for him until he gets back).
  • Summer is soon than you think.
ad