1 / 21

指導教授:張菽萱 報告人:沈永祺

Research and trends in science education from 1998 to 2002: a content analysis of publication in selected journals. 指導教授:張菽萱 報告人:沈永祺. 作者: Chin-Chung Tsai. 出處: INT. J. SCI. EDUC., 21 JANUARY 2005, VOL. 27, NO. 1, 3-14. Abstract .

galvin
Download Presentation

指導教授:張菽萱 報告人:沈永祺

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Research and trends in science education from 1998 to 2002: a content analysis of publication in selected journals 指導教授:張菽萱 報告人:沈永祺

  2. 作者:Chin-Chung Tsai 出處:INT. J. SCI. EDUC., 21 JANUARY 2005, VOL. 27, NO. 1, 3-14

  3. Abstract • This study conducted a series of content analyses of the articles published by International Journal of Science Education (IJSE), Science Education (SE), and Journal of Research in Science Teaching (JRST) from 1998 to 2002. • Two findings: • Researchers in four major English-speaking countries, including the US, the UK, Australia and Canada, contributed to a majority of the publications, but the researchers from other non-English countries may have, to a certain extent, gradually played a valuable role on the published work. • Most of the published articles were categorized as empirical studies, while position, theoretical and review papers were rarely presented in the journals.

  4. Introduction • In the field of psychology and educational psychology: • Rennie (1998): • Improve the research quality of related papers, including the use of correct terminology. • The provision of sufficient information about the data to enable replications to be made. • The reporting and interpretation of effect magnitudes.

  5. Introduction • Eybe and Schmidt (2001) examined research papers in chemistry education based on 6 criteria: • Theory-relatedness • Quality of the research question • Methods • Presentation and interpretation of results • Implications for practice • Competence in chemistry

  6. Introduction • In the field of science education: researchers with a variety of cultural backgrounds have gradually begun to contribute their ideas to the field.

  7. Introduction • Questions: • How did authors from different countries contribute to the publications of these selected journals from 1998 to 2002? • How did the types of research published in the journals vary across these five years? • How did the research topics published in the journals vary across these five years?

  8. Method • Authors’ nationality n: the number of author i: the order of the specific author

  9. Method • Research type: • Empirical research article • Position paper • Theoretical paper • Review • Other

  10. Method • Research topic: • Teacher education • Teaching • Learning-conceptions • Learning-contexts • Goals and policy, curriculum, evaluation, and assessment • Culture, social, and gender issues • History, philosophy, epistemology, and nature of science • Educational technology • Informal learning

  11. Results

  12. Results

  13. Results

  14. Results

  15. Results

  16. Results

  17. Results

  18. Results

  19. Discussion and conclusion • The researchers from other non-English countries may have, to a certain extent, also played an important role on this. • Most of the published articles were categorized as empirical studies, while position, theoretical and review papers were rarely presented in the journals. • The research topic of students’ conceptions and conceptual change was the most frequently investigated one in these five years, but this topic probably showed a declining trend when analyzed by year.

  20. Discussion and conclusion • The value of this study and the difference from relevant studies presented previously: • This study analyzed the publications in terms of authors’ nationality. The nationality may more reflect the growing international feature of research community. • This study analyzed the research types and topics, helping researchers explore the current status of research and trends in the field.

More Related