html5-img
1 / 7

Bunch monitor signal integration

Bunch monitor signal integration. 13/12/13. Intro. P arallel bunch monitor (located after injection foil) Assume i ntegral of each peak proportional to bunch charge. Figures from Suzie’s presentation 13/11/13. H- beam injected. H+ beam circulating. Signal preprocessing.

Download Presentation

Bunch monitor signal integration

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Bunch monitor signal integration 13/12/13

  2. Intro • Parallel bunch monitor (located after injection foil) • Assume integral of each peak proportional to bunch charge. Figures from Suzie’s presentation 13/11/13 H- beam injected H+ beam circulating

  3. Signal preprocessing • Use Shinji’s peak finding algorithm to find set of tpeak • For every peak, isolate the signal for that turn, Seems tpeak – 30ns < t < tpeak + 50 ns is reasonable. • Remove slow variation (slope) in signal by subtracting from each point a line that passes through the minima on both sides.

  4. Prepared signals First 20 turns First 81 turns in 10 turn steps

  5. Area calculation methods • FWHM * width • Integrate under curve by quadrature (scipy.interpolate.quadrature • FWHM times indicated by dashed lines. • Asymmetric bunch broadending

  6. Example result 1 (data from 1/11/13) • File: ~SortByDate/2013/11/13/1/?.csv (must check) • Area decreases for the first few turns. Plateau for some time and then drops again • Fit width vs turns in linear region to obtain dp (here we assume dp is fixed). Phase slip η from Zgoubi model at injection momentum. • Head-meets-tail debunchtime from dp calculation = 38 turns

  7. Example result 2 (data from 1/11/13) • File: ~SortByDate/2013/11/13/1/double090.csv • No decrease in area for first few turns in this case • Debunchtime from dp calculation = 32 turns • Hints of rebunchingin data? Signal is weak, could be in the noise.

More Related