1 / 20

An Analysis of Career Tracks in the Design of IS Curricula in the U.S.

An Analysis of Career Tracks in the Design of IS Curricula in the U.S. Drew Hwang dhwang@csupomona.edu Louise Soe llsoe@csupomona.edu Computer Information Systems, Cal Poly Pomona. Topics. Background of study Literature Review Research methods Findings Career Track Categories

gali
Download Presentation

An Analysis of Career Tracks in the Design of IS Curricula in the U.S.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. An Analysis of Career Tracks in the Design of IS Curricula in the U.S. Drew Hwangdhwang@csupomona.eduLouise Soellsoe@csupomona.eduComputer Information Systems, Cal Poly Pomona

  2. Topics • Background of study • Literature Review • Research methods • Findings • Career Track Categories • Career Track Frequencies • Conclusions / Recommendations • Naming strategies & numbers • Career Track Structures

  3. Background • Study began in 2006 when our department was reviewing and changing its curriculum • What do other programs offer? • How do we compare? • What should we change? • Drew reviewed career tracks in 4-year schools with MIS/IS/CIS majors or programs • “Career Track Design in IS Curriculum: A Case Study,” Information Systems Education Journal, November 2007, 5(29), 1-18 • Presented at ISECON 2007 • Drew updated data for this paper in Feb-May 2009

  4. Two approaches to curriculum studies (Jones, 1997) 1. Normative – develop normative standards to ensure “body of knowledge” and skill sets are part of the curriculum • Model curricula • IS 2002 • IT 2004 • Working group on new model curriculum: Topi, Valacich, Kaiser, Nunamaker, Sipior, de Vreede, and Wright. “”Revising the IS Model Curriculum: Rethinking the Approach and the Process.” Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 20, pp 728-740.

  5. Two approaches to curriculum studies (Jones, 1997) 2. Descriptive – describes what exists – our study fits here • What exists • Longenecker & Feinstein (1989) • Gill and Hu (1999) looked at changes • AACSB school curricula • Chen, Danesh, Willhardt, 1991 • Heinrichs and Banerjee (2002) • Kung, Yang and Zhang (2006) • Comparisons to model curricula • MacKinnon, 2003 • Williams and Pomykalski (2006)

  6. Curriculum design spectrum • Curriculum with diversity • Broad spectrum of knowledge and skills – • Curriculum with specificity • Concentrations in one or more subfields • Career track model falls within this part of the spectrum • Other names for career tracks: options, emphases, concentrations, specializations, specialties, paths, certificates, clusters, support areas

  7. Is specificity relevant? • “Generic IS curriculum is outdated” (Lee, Trauth and Farwell (1995, p. 333) • “Single career track” IS professional is “outdated” (Lightfoot, 1999) • Specialization occurs in graduate programs (Ehie, 2002) • No relationship between IS course specialization and initial full-time job placement and starting salary (Ross, et. al 2004)

  8. Methodology • Between February and May, 2009, Drew reviewed curricula of 450 U.S. business schools with baccalaureate IS programs • http://www.univsource.com/bus.htm • He looked at every school’s website to identify those with career tracks or specializations • Built a database • Analyzed his findings

  9. Findings • 110 /450 (24.5%) had career tracks or specializations • No standardized way to name career tracks • No standard way to define what courses belong in a career track • No standard way to define how many courses make up a track • During our analysis, we clustered them into categories based on names and what courses they included

  10. Track Names usually contain keywords • IS Fields: Information Systems, Information Technology, Computer Information Systems, Management Information Systems • IS subfields: Networking, Decision Support Systems • Referent disciplines: Accounting Information Systems • Job names: Business analyst

  11. How many courses in a career track? • Track curriculum varied in size: • defined from beginning to end • Could be 2 to 5 courses beyond a common core • Could be very similar to other tracks within the same program (sometimes one class differentiated two tracks) • Could involve other programs (e.g., accounting) • Could be defined by student and an advisor

  12. How did we classify them? • First, based on Track name • Then looked at courses listed for career tracks (since different schools defined this differently) if we were unsure • Then classified them into groups – tried to hit right granularity

  13. Career track Categories (304 tracks)

  14. How many tracks per school?

  15. Conclusions: Numbers / Naming • Most schools (80.9%) with tracks have 1 to 3 • Probably due to resources and complexity • Track naming is idiosyncratic – we assume it is a faculty decision, probably influenced by: • Subfields in which they specialize – • In older subfields, track names vary less • In newer subfields, more variation for similar tracks • Names attractive to prospective employers • Representation of faculty areas of expertise • Schools seem to update tracks in line with new technologies and opportunities for jobs.

  16. Conclusions: Track structure • No consistent track structure among these programs • Tracks with same name at 2 schools may vary widely • Highly structured (no choices) to highly flexible (determined by student and advisor) • May be interdisciplinary in nature or not • 2 tracks in same program may have courses that are mutually exclusive or may vary by only one course • IS programs within business schools they may be partnered with referent disciplines, which influences curriculum offerings.

  17. Conclusions: in 11 Track Categories • 7 categories represent standards in IS field – well established • Applications Development, IS Disciplines, Systems / Business Analysis, Networking / Telecommunications, Information Management, Decision Support, End-user computing – note the last two are dwindling. • 2 categories represent more recent IT areas • Web Development / E-Commerce • Information Assurance • Business Functional Applications category • stresses individual business functional areas • Specialized Information Systems / Studies • a catchall category

  18. Recommendations • Programs reviewing their career tracks should continue to scan the environment and the career opportunities available to students • The newest model curriculum task force is working in the area of a career track model curriculum – their findings and recommendations may influence future career tracks.

  19. Future Research possibilities • Longitudinal review in 2 years to see what is changing, especially in this period of uncertainty • Compare characteristics of schools with career tracks with those that do not • Compare existing tracks with model curricula, especially when new model with career specializations is in place Hwang & Soe, ISECON, 2009

  20. Questions? • Comments? • Ideas? Hwang & Soe, ISECON, 2009

More Related