1 / 2

BACKGROUND

STUDY PLOT DESIGN. 200 ft. Wood zone – logs stacked here. 100. ’. 100 ft. Maximum self-thinning line (RD=1.0). 87.2 ft. 200 ft. 87.2. ’. Ghost trails. 30 ft. 30 ft. 12 ft. STAND HISTORY. Forwarder trails - approx. 12 ft wide and 100 ft apart.

gaia
Download Presentation

BACKGROUND

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. STUDY PLOT DESIGN 200 ft Wood zone – logs stacked here 100 ’ 100 ft Maximum self-thinning line (RD=1.0) 87.2 ft 200 ft 87.2 ’ Ghost trails 30 ft 30 ft 12 ft STAND HISTORY Forwarder trails - approx. 12 ft wide and 100 ft apart ~1966—Overstory removal, naturally regenerated ~1982—Herbicide treatment ~1985—Pre-commercially thinned to a target density of 850 trees/acre February 2002—Plots 7 and 3 were commercially thinned to remove 33 and 50 percent respectively of the relative density Maine's Commercial Thinning Research Network Irving Woodlands, LLC, Weeks Brook Installation Robert G. Wagner, Robert S. Seymour, and Daniel J. McConville BACKGROUND Members of the University of Maine’s Cooperative Forestry Research Unit (CFRU) have identified a better understanding about how forest stands respond to commercial thinning as a top research priority for 2000-2005. As a result, the CFRU Commercial Thinning Research Network was established in 2000. A primary objective of this network is to establish a set of long-term commercial thinning study sites across the state of Maine.Initial efforts are directed at the spruce-fir forest type. Research installations in mature spruce-fir stands that have been previously pre-commercially thinned are answering two key questions: What is the influence of: (1) timing of commercial thinning? (2) residual density on subsequent stand response? • EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN • Randomized complete block design with 6 sites or replications • Seven 0.92 A (200 x 200 ft) treatment plots containing 0.20 A (100 x 87.2 ft) measurement plot installed per site (see diagram) • Pre-treatment tree measurements include tree species, DBH, height, and location in plot (summer 2000) • Pre-treatment data were used to develop treatment specifications for each plot • Plots were thinned using a single-grip processor with forwarder and ghost trails (see diagram) in 2001-2002 • Merchantable volume removed was measured • Residual trees are numbered with aluminum tag, location within plot recorded, and DBH, height, and live crown monitored over long-term • Data collected from this site are being combined with data from other sites across state to determine tree- and stand-level responses to commercial thinning treatments THEORETICAL AND ACTUAL TREATMENT EFFECTS AS SHOWN ON STAND DENSITY MANAGEMENT DIAGRAM Theoretical effect of thinning intensity on residual relative density Time of entry Control 2011 2006 Log tree volume 2001 Start 50% 33% RD reduction Log tree density TREATMENT PRESCRIPTIONS Actual treatment effect following first thinning at 33% and 50% at this site 10 Average stand trajectory line Max. self- thinning line 33% 50% Log tree volume (ft3) Control 1 100 1000 10000 Log tree density (TPA)

  2. Irving Weeks Brook Rd. Plum Creek Lazy Tom Plum Creek Ronco Cove IP Macwahoc IP Alder Stream CFRU COOPERATORS PEF Comp. 23A The following organizations have supported this research through the Cooperative Forestry Research Unit at the University of Maine Major Cooperators Baskahegan Corporation Clayton Lake Woodlands Nexfor Fraser Papers, Inc. Hancock Timber Resource Group Huber Resources Corporation International Paper Company Irving Woodlands, LLC Maine Bureau of Parks and Lands Maine Timberlands Company MeadWestvaco Corporation Plum Creek Timber Company, Inc. Prentiss & Carlisle Company, Inc. Ste. Aurelie Timberlands Company Seven Islands Land Company The Nature Conservancy Other Cooperators Bethel Furniture Stock, Inc. H.O. Bouchard, Inc. Field Timberlands Finestkind Tree Farms Hancock Lumber Company, Inc. Huber Wood Products Landvest F. A. Madden, Inc. Peavey Manufacturing Company Pride Manufacturing Company Robbins Lumber Company Western Maine Nurseries 12’ WIDE FORWARDER TRAILS WERE CUT ON 100’ INTERVALS STUDY SITES PLOT CONDITIONS BEFORE AND AFTER THINNING Total stand volume (VOL/A) in cords/acre, stand density (TPA) in trees per acre, mean volume per tree (VOL/TREE) in ft3 per tree, and relative density (RD), before thinning and immediately after thinning for plots that had received a thinning. THINNING EQUIPMENT USED For more information about this study site contact: Cooperative Forestry Research Unit Bob Wagner, Director and Professor of Forest Ecosystem Science University of Maine, Orono, Maine 04469-5755; Phone: (207) 581-2903; Email: bob_wagner@umenfa.maine.edu Irving Woodlands, LLC Hugh Crammond: (207) 435-3681 Valmet single-grip processor used in the thinning operation

More Related