1 / 5

4 November 2009

TGIC Exchange Brief Government In-Sourcing. 4 November 2009. Keith Beavers, VP. Advanced Warfighting Solutions. In-sourcing – Taxpayer Perspective.

gagan
Download Presentation

4 November 2009

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. TGIC Exchange BriefGovernment In-Sourcing 4 November 2009 Keith Beavers, VP Advanced Warfighting Solutions

  2. In-sourcing – Taxpayer Perspective • President Obama said in his inaugural address that the issue is not whether gov’t should be larger or smaller but whether it can work better for the American people - Agree • 6 Apr 09, SecDef announced the Department would scale back the role of contractors in support services - Role?? • 8 Apr 09, Comptroller realigned resources to decrease contract support by 33.4K positions via RMD 802 - quota?? • Perspective is lost, impetus driven by a number/quota/goal

  3. In-sourcing Implementation • DepSecDef Implementation memo, 28 May 09 • Inherently Gov’t (IG) - Agree • Personal services or contract admin - Agree • Contracted services that can be performed more cost effectively - Definitely Agree • Prioritizing In-sourcing • Valid and enduring definition defies attributes of a contractor providing as and when required • IG, Exempted Functions, Unauthorized Personal Services, Problems with Contract Admin • No cost analysis for above

  4. In-sourcing-Taxpayer and Industry Perspective • Cost Analysis – Guidance to be provided by P&R, per PDM 13 Dec 2006 • Like comparison • With benefits, fringe • “Should cost” • Should be shared with public/industry • Services jobs are stable if the market is stable • GS jobs are stable except BRAC, Reorgs, change in requirements • If it works better for the taxpayer - so be it, but does it?

More Related