AZIZA RESTU FEBRIANTO, 2201404666
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 7

Identitas Mahasiswa PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 67 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

AZIZA RESTU FEBRIANTO, 2201404666 THE COMPARISON OF STUDENTS ACHIEVEMENT IN WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT BETWEEN NATURAL SCHOOL AND REGULAR SCHOOL (A CASE OF SECOND GRADE STUDENTS OF SMP ALAM ARRIDHO SEMARANG AND SMP NEGERI 22 SEMARANG). Identitas Mahasiswa.

Download Presentation

Identitas Mahasiswa

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Identitas mahasiswa

  • AZIZA RESTU FEBRIANTO, 2201404666THE COMPARISON OF STUDENTS ACHIEVEMENT IN WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT BETWEEN NATURAL SCHOOL AND REGULAR SCHOOL (A CASE OF SECOND GRADE STUDENTS OF SMP ALAM ARRIDHO SEMARANG AND SMP NEGERI 22 SEMARANG)


Identitas mahasiswa

  • Identitas Mahasiswa

  • - NAMA : AZIZA RESTU FEBRIANTO - NIM : 2201404666 - PRODI : Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris - JURUSAN : BAHASA & SASTRA INGGRIS - FAKULTAS : Bahasa dan Seni - EMAIL : aziza_febrianto pada domain yahoo.com - PEMBIMBING 1 : WIDHIYANTO, SPd., M.Pd. - PEMBIMBING 2 : DRS. LA ODE MUSYARIDUN - TGL UJIAN : 2009-07-22


Identitas mahasiswa

  • Judul

  • THE COMPARISON OF STUDENTS ACHIEVEMENT IN WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT BETWEEN NATURAL SCHOOL AND REGULAR SCHOOL (A CASE OF SECOND GRADE STUDENTS OF SMP ALAM ARRIDHO SEMARANG AND SMP NEGERI 22 SEMARANG)


Identitas mahasiswa

  • Abstrak

  • This study entitled ‘The Comparison of Students’ Achievement in WritingDescriptive Text between Nature School and Regular School.’ This study focuseson the comparison of the aspect of writing skill to find significant difference ofthe students’ achievement in writing descriptive text from different schools. Inthis study, the researcher took the samples of the students’ descriptive writingsfrom SMP Alam Arridho Semarang as a Natural School and SMP Negeri 22Semarang as a Regular School, then analyzed them by using Brown’s theory andthe Genre features.The objectives of this study are: (1) to find the significant difference found in thedescriptive texts between the students of SMP Alam Arridho Semarang as aNatural School and the students of SMP Negeri 22 Semarang as a Regular School,(2) to find and show what kind of difference arises is. Related to the objectivesabove, the researcher found that the prominent differences are: (1) the studentswho have been studying in the Natural School get more freedom to explore theirideas in writing descriptive text. They are also more creative in writingDescriptive text. The factor that makes them become more creative is that writingis actually their habit. They are accustomed to being asked to write some certainobjects in other subjects beside English. Hence, their writing is more developedand complete. (2) the descriptive writings of the students of SMP Alam ArridhoSemarag are mostly better in the aspects of organization, content, Punctuation,spelling, mechanics, and style or quality of expression though the students fromboth schools almost have the same ability in using grammar. However, thestudents of SMP 22 Semarang have made better writing in the aspects of thecommunicative purpose of the text.Hopefully, the results of this study can be useful for English teachers as aguideline to compose Lesson plan and to consider several methods used in thenatural school as an Alternative school in teaching. The method which is rarelyimplemented in the Regular school is thematic method in which the teachers useRealia such as outdoor media and Excursion. This method is really important tobe considered by the other teachers. Besides, other further researchers may use itas a reference to conduct other research on the same field. They may also conductsuch a related research to find the effectiveness of Alternative Schools inEducation.


Identitas mahasiswa

  • Kata Kunci

  • Students’ Achievement, Writing, Descriptive Text, NaturalSchool, and Regular School.


Identitas mahasiswa

  • Referensi

  • Meyer, Alan. 2005. Gateways to Academic Writing: Effective Sentences,Paragraphs, and Essays. New York: Pearson Education, inc.Burton, S. H. 1985. Mastering English Language. Hongkong: The Mac millanPress. LTDHartono, Rudi. 1982. Genre Based Writing. Semarang: English Department,Faculty of Language and Art. UNNES.Bram, Barli. 1995. Write well, Improving writing Skills. Yogyakarta: SanataDharma University Press.Hackett, Laura and Williamson, Richard. 1980. Design for a composition. NewYork: Harcoutt, Brace & World, Inc.Hardey. 1980. The Psychology of Written Composition. UK, Britain: KeelyUniversity.Hornby, S.H. 1995. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current English.Oxford: Oxford University Press.Ramelan. 1985. English Phonetics. Semarang: UPT UNNES Press.Harmer, Jeremy. 1991. How to Teach English. Cambridge: Longman.Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. 2007. Model Silabus dan RencanaPelaksanaan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Badan Standar NasionalPendidikan.Soeparwoto, Hendriyani, Rulita and Liftiah. 2007. Psikologi Perkembangan.Semarang: UPT UNNES Press.Tri Anni, Catharina, Rifa’I, Achmad, Purwanto, Eddy dan Purnomo Daniel. 2007.Psikologi Belajar. Semarang: UPT UNNES Press.Sugandi, Achmad dan Haryanto. 2008. Teori Pembelajaran. Semarang: UPTUNNES Press.Pardjowidjodjo, Soenjono. 2005. Psikolinguistik: Pengantar Pemahaman BahasaManusia. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.Suparno, Paul. 2001. Teori Perkembangan Kognitif Jean Piaget. Yogyakarta:Penerbit Kanisius.Septriana. 2008. Novobiografi: Sebuah Novel Biografi, Lendo Novo. Bogor: SouPublisher.Komunitas Sekolah Alam. 2005. Menemukan Sekolah yang Membebaskan:Perjalanan Menggapai Sekolah Yang Mendidik Anak MenjadiManusia Berkarakter. Tangerang: PT. Kawan Pustaka.Koentjaraningrat. 1986. Metode – metode Penelitian Masyarakat. Jakarta: PT.Gramedia.Arikunto. 1986. Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: RhinekaCipta.Kartono, Kartini. 1996. Pengantar Metodologi Riset Sosial. Bandung: MandarMajuBrown, R. Douglas. 2004. Language Assessment. San Francisco: San FranciscoState University.Characteristics of Good Descriptive Writing. Online atwww.Booknutsreadingclub.com Good Descriptive text/edld/conf.html [accessed 02/16/09]Key. James P. Research Design in Occupational Education. Online atwww.okstate.edu. Module R13. Experimental Research andDesign.html. [accessed 03/02/09]University of Otago. Student Learning Development. Paragraph and SentenceStructure.Online atwww.hede.otago.ac.nz. [accessed 04/17/09]Reid, J.M. (1994). The Process of Paragraph Writing (2nd Ed.). Basic ParagraphStructure. Online atwww.irs.ed.uiuc.edu. [accessed 04/17/09]The Indiana Department of Education. Descriptive Writing. Online atwww.thewritingsite.org. [accessed 04/18/09]Vancouver School District. Writing Mode Description. Online atwww.vannet.k12.wa.us. [accessed 04/18/09]www.sekolahalam.org.


Identitas mahasiswa

  • Terima Kasih

  • http://unnes.ac.id


  • Login