Slide1 l.jpg
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 21

Evaluation of the Simulated Ocean Response to Hurricane Ivan in Comparison to High-Quality Ocean Observations PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 153 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Evaluation of the Simulated Ocean Response to Hurricane Ivan in Comparison to High-Quality Ocean Observations. George Halliwell , Nick Shay Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science University of Miami, Miami, FL William Teague Naval Research Laboratory, Stennis Space Center, MS.

Download Presentation

Evaluation of the Simulated Ocean Response to Hurricane Ivan in Comparison to High-Quality Ocean Observations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Slide1 l.jpg

Evaluation of the Simulated Ocean Response to Hurricane Ivan in Comparison to High-Quality Ocean Observations

George Halliwell, Nick Shay

Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science

University of Miami, Miami, FL

William Teague

Naval Research Laboratory, Stennis Space Center, MS


Goals l.jpg

Improve ocean model response to TC forcing in a complex oceanographic environment

Improve coupled TC prediction models

Especially intensity forecasts

Improve hindcasts of the ocean response during and after individual storms

e.g., oil and gas industry

Improve our scientific understanding of the ocean response to TC forcing

GOALS


Ocean model improvement l.jpg

Ocean models still require evaluation and improvement of TC response

Requires high-quality observations

Requirements

Accurate initialization

Ocean features (currents, warm- and cold-core eddies)

Vertical T, S, density structure

Ocean Heat Content (OHC) distribution

Improve air-sea flux parameterizations

Improve vertical mixing

Ocean Model Improvement


Approach l.jpg

Evaluate HYbrid Coordinate Ocean Model (HYCOM) against high-quality ocean observations

Future ocean component of HWRF model

Uncoupled ocean response simulations

Isolate ocean model sensitivity given constant forcing

Will complement evaluation of the coupled HWRF model

Initial Focus - Hurricane Ivan (Sept. 2004)

Initial OHC distribution important to SST response

High-quality ADCP velocity moorings

Naval Research Laboratory SEED project

APPROACH


Observed sst response to ivan l.jpg

Observed SST Response to Ivan

Microwave satellite

(Remote Sensing Systems)

AVHRR (Walker et al, 2005)


Ivan intensity l.jpg

Ivan Intensity


Hurricane ivan simulations 1 l.jpg

Gulf of Mexico domain

10 Sept. to 6 Oct. 2004

Initial and boundary conditions

Ocean nowcast-forecast system

Alternative to feature-based analysis

Several products available or under development

Global Ocean Data Assimilation Experiment (GODAE)

Test the U. S. Navy system

Under development by NOPP consortium

Couples HYCOM to the NCODA assimilation system

Hurricane Ivan Simulations (1)


Hurricane ivan simulations 2 l.jpg

Forcing

Navy 0.5-degree NOGAPS atmospheric model

Wind speed blended with higher resolution fields obtained from the NOAA/HRD HWIND product

Wind stress calculated using Powell cd

Hurricane Ivan Simulations (2)


Ivan analysis l.jpg

Importance of accurate initialization

Evaluate ocean data assimilative hindcast

U.S. Navy ocean nowcast-forecast system (HYCOM-NCODA)

Sensitivity to vertical mixing parameterization

K-Profile Parameterization (KPP)

Mellor-Yamada level 2.5 closure (MY)

Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS)

Ocean current response

ADCP moorings in north-central Gulf of Mexico

Ivan Analysis


Ssh 10 sept 2004 l.jpg

SSH, 10 Sept. 2004


Simulated sst response to ivan l.jpg

Simulated SST Response to Ivan


Sst c before and after ivan l.jpg

SST (C) Before and After Ivan


Depth time temperature variability l.jpg

Depth-Time Temperature Variability


Ivan analysis14 l.jpg

Importance of accurate initialization

Evaluate ocean data assimilative hindcast

U.S. Navy ocean nowcast-forecast system (HYCOM-NCODA)

Sensitivity to vertical mixing parameterization

K-Profile Parameterization (KPP)

Mellor-Yamada level 2.5 closure (MY)

Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS)

Ocean current response

ADCP moorings in north-central Gulf of Mexico

Ivan Analysis


Sst change 10 to 17 sept l.jpg

SST Change, 10 to 17 Sept.


Sst c after ivan l.jpg

SST (C) After Ivan


Ivan analysis17 l.jpg

Importance of accurate initialization

Evaluate ocean data assimilative hindcast

U.S. Navy ocean nowcast-forecast system (HYCOM-NCODA)

Sensitivity to vertical mixing parameterization

K-Profile Parameterization (KPP)

Mellor-Yamada level 2.5 closure (MY)

Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS)

Ocean current response

ADCP moorings in north-central Gulf of Mexico

Ivan Analysis


Seed moorings and ivan path l.jpg

SEED Moorings and Ivan Path

9


Slide20 l.jpg

u

v

0

150


Summary l.jpg

Summary

  • Accurate initialization of the Loop Current, detached warm eddy, and two cold eddies by an ocean nowcast product was critically important to the Ivan ocean response simulations

    • Cannot forget cold ocean features

  • Response is sensitive to vertical mixing parameterization

    • Three-dimensional dynamical processes are important

  • Good qualitative comparison between observed and simulated currents at SEED moorings

    • Simulated near-inertial currents decay too rapidly

  • Ocean model improvement will require high-quality three-dimensional ocean observations


  • Login