1 / 53

Laplacian Deformation for Non-rigid Registration

Learn about Laplacian deformation, a method used for non-rigid registration, which involves minimizing the distance between a deformed source shape and a target shape. This technique is efficient and preserves local shape features.

gabrielg
Download Presentation

Laplacian Deformation for Non-rigid Registration

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CSE 554Lecture 9: Laplacian Deformation Fall 2016

  2. Review Source • Alignment • Registering source to target by rotation and translation • Rigid-body transformations • Methods • Aligning principle directions (PCA) • Aligning corresponding points (SVD) • Iterative improvement (ICP) • Initialize with PCA • Alternate between finding correspondences and SVD Input Target After PCA After ICP

  3. Non-rigid Registration • Rigid alignment cannot account for shape variance • Non-rigid deformation is needed for improved fitting Source Target Rigid alignment After non-rigid deformation

  4. Non-rigid Registration • A minimization problem • Minimizing the distance between the deformed source and the target • “Fitting term” • Minimizing the distortion to the source shape • “Distortion term”

  5. Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic • Intrinsic methods • Deforms points on the source curve/surface • App: boundary curve or surface matching • Extrinsic methods • Deforms all points in the space around the source curve/surface • App: image or volume matching

  6. Intrinsic Registration Target • Given a source and target shape • Plus correspondences between some source points (called handles) and target points • Relocate source points such that: • The handles move to their corresponding targets (fitting term) • The rest of the shape deforms as naturally as possible (distortion term) • ICP-style registration • Alternate between finding correspondences (e.g., closest neighbors) and deformation Handle

  7. Laplacian-based Deformation • An intrinsic method used in graphics/animation • Simple and efficient (fitting/distortion terms are quadratic) • Preserving local shape features • Reference: “Laplacian surface editing”, by Sorkine et al., 2004

  8. Setup • Input • Source with n points: p1,…,pn • For notation purpose, assume that the first m points are handles • Target location of handles: q1,…,qm • Output • Deformed locations of source points: p1’,…,pn’ Deformed Source q2 p3=q3 p1=q1 p2 An example with 3 handles, two of which are stationary (red)

  9. Overview • Finding deformed locations pi’ that minimize: • Ef: fitting term • Measures how close are the deformed handles to the target • Ed: distortion term • Measures how much the source shape is changed

  10. Fitting Term • Sum of squared distances to target handle locations q2 p2

  11. Distortion Term • Q: How to measure shape locally? • A: By “bumpiness” at each vertex • Laplacian: vector from the centroid of neighbors to the vertex • A linear operator over point locations • Recall that in fairing, we minimizes this vector to “smooth out” bumps where Ni are indices of neighboring vertices of pi

  12. Distortion Term • Minimizing changes in Laplacians during deformation • Over all source points i: Laplacian at pi before deformation

  13. Putting Together • Finding deformed locations pi’ that minimize: • A quadratic equation in terms of variables (pix’, piy’, piz’) • qi, i are constants • L[] is a linear operator

  14. Quadratic Minimization • A general form of quadratic minimization: • There are s variables: x=(x1,…,xs)T • Each a1,…, ak is a length-s column vector (linear coefficients) • Each b1,…, bk is a scalar (constant coefficients) • k should be greater than s (so that the problem is over-constrained)

  15. Quadratic Minimization • Re-writing our minimization in the general form • In 2D, there are s=2n variables: x = (p1x’,…, pnx’, p1y’,…, pny’ )T • In 3D, there are s=3n variables • We will next re-write each quadratic term in 2D as (aix-bi)2 • Can be extended easily to 3D

  16. Quadratic Minimization • The ai and bi in the fitting term • There are 2m quadratic terms • In the first set of m terms: • For i=1,…,m, bi=qix, aicontains all zero, except its (i)th entry is 1. • In the second set of m terms: • For i=1,…,m, bi+m=qiy, ai+mcontains all zero, except its (i+n)th entry is 1

  17. Quadratic Minimization • The ai and bi in the fitting term • There are 2m quadratic terms • Example with 3 vertices and 2 fitting constraints (n=3; m=2):

  18. Quadratic Minimization • The ai and bi in the distortion term: • There are 2n quadratic terms • The first set of n terms: • For i=1,…,n, ai is all zero except the (i)th entry is 1, the (j)th entries are -1/|Ni| for all jNi, and bi=ix • The second set of n terms: • For i=1,…,n, ai+n is all zero except the (i+n)th entry is 1, the (j+n)th entries are -1/|Ni| for all jNi, and bi+n=iy

  19. Quadratic Minimization • The ai and bi in the distortion term: • There are 2n quadratic terms • Example with 3 vertices (n=3):

  20. Quadratic Minimization • To solve: • Re-write in matrix form: where is a k by s matrix is a length-k vector

  21. Quadratic Minimization • The minimizer is where the partial derivatives are all zero • To solve for x in this equation: • Taking matrix inverse (good for small s, but numerically unstable for large s) • Using specialized linear system solver (LinearSolve in Mathematica, Eigen/TNT/LAPACK in C)

  22. Summary • Compute Laplacians (i) • Construct coefficients (ai, bi) • Put them into matrices (A,B) • Solve (x)

  23. Results Deformed A small deformation

  24. Results Deformed A larger deformation

  25. Results Deformed Stretching

  26. Results Deformed Shrinking

  27. Results Deformed Rotation

  28. Discussion • Limitations • Local features don’t rotate or scale with the model • Reason: Laplacian is not invariant under rotation or scale • Two bumps that differ by rotation or scale result in non-zero distortion

  29. A Better Distortion Term • Not penalizing rotation and scaling of local features • Estimating how the local neighborhood is transformed • Transforming the original Laplacian vectors before comparing to the deformed Laplacians

  30. Catch 22 • Q: How do we find Tibefore we know the deformed shape? • A: Represent Ti as a function of the unknown variables • A linear function of pi’, just like L • We will focus in the derivations of the 2D case • 3D results will be briefly presented at the end

  31. Transformation Matrices (2D) • Homogeneous coordinates • A 2D point: (x,y,1) • A 2D vector: (x,y,0) • A 3D point: (x,y,z,1) • A 3D vector: (x,y,z,0)

  32. Transformation Matrices (2D) • Translation • Cartesian coordinates: vector addition • Homogeneous coordinates: matrix product

  33. Transformation Matrices (2D) • Isotropic scaling • Cartesian coordinates: vector scaling • Homogeneous coordinates: matrix product

  34. Transformation Matrices (2D) • Rotation • Cartesian coordinates: matrix product • Homogeneous coordinates: matrix product

  35. Transformation Matrices (2D) • Summary of elementary similarity transformations • To perform a sequence of transformations: multiple the corresponding matrices in order Translation by vector v Scaling by scalar s Rotation by angle 

  36. Similarity Transforms (2D) • General similarity transformations • The product of any set of similarity matrices can be written this way • Any choice of (a, w, tx, ty) can be written as a sequence of rotation, isotropic scaling and translation • Note that a and w can’t be both zero

  37. Computing Ti (2D) • Suppose we know the deformed locations pi’ • Compute Ti as the similarity transform that best fits the neighborhood of pi to that of pi’

  38. Computing Ti (2D) • Suppose we know the deformed locations pi’ • Compute Ti as the similarity transform that best fits the neighborhood of pi to that of pi’ • This is a quadratic minimization problem for entries of Ti • E.g., a, w, tx, ty

  39. Computing Ti (2D) • The matrix form of the minimization is: where is a 2|Ni|+2 by 4 matrix, and Ni={i1, i2,…} are indices of neighboring vertices of pi

  40. Computing Ti (2D) • By quadratic minimization: • Linear expressions of variables (pix’ , piy’)

  41. Distortion Term (2D) • Two parts of each distortion term: • Transformed Laplacian: • Laplacian of the deformed locations: where where is a 2 by 2|Ni|+2 matrix

  42. Distortion Term (2D) • Putting together: • They form 2n quadratic terms (aix-bi)2 for x = (p1x’,…, pnx’, p1y’,…, pny’ )T • All bi are zero • Each ai can be extracted from H where and are its rows

  43. Results (2D) Old distortion term New distortion term

  44. Results (2D) New distortion term Old distortion term

  45. Results (2D) Old distortion term New distortion term

  46. Results (2D) Old distortion term New distortion term

  47. Registration • Use nearest neighbors as corresponding target locations • Assuming the source is already close to the target • Iterative closest point (ICP) • 1. For each point on the source pi, treat it as a handle, and assign its closest point on the target as its target location qi. • 2. Compute Laplacian-based deformation. • 3. Repeat step (1) until a termination criteria is met.

  48. Result After rigid alignment 1 iteration of Laplacian 7 iterations of Laplacian Overlaying all curves

  49. Result • Weighting the distortion term large w medium w small w

  50. Similarity Transforms (3D) • Elementary transformation matrices • To perform a sequence of transformations: take the product of these matrices Translation by vector v Scaling by scalar s Rotation by angle  around X axis

More Related