A semi historical romp through prevailing perspectives on leadership
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 64

A Semi-historical Romp Through Prevailing Perspectives on Leadership PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 99 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

A Semi-historical Romp Through Prevailing Perspectives on Leadership . EDU 6040 Leadership in Learning Organizations. Everyone Has a Theory. THE PAOMNNEHAL PWEOR OF THE HMUAN MNID  I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg …

Download Presentation

A Semi-historical Romp Through Prevailing Perspectives on Leadership

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


A semi historical romp through prevailing perspectives on leadership

A Semi-historical RompThrough Prevailing Perspectives on Leadership

EDU 6040

Leadership in Learning Organizations


Everyone has a theory

Everyone Has a Theory

THE PAOMNNEHAL PWEOR OF

THE HMUAN MNID 

I cdnuoltblveieetaht I cluodaulacltyuesdnatnrdwaht I was rdanieg…

Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at CmabrigdeUinervtisy, it deosn'tmttaer in wahtoredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olnyiprmoatnttihng is that the frist and lsatltteer be in the rghitpclae. The rset can be a taotlmses and you can sitllraed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the human mind deos not raederveylteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Amzanig huh?

Your picture of leadership…


Early notions of leadership

Early Notions of Leadership

  • Legends, Myths, Heroes:

    • Stories of individual heroes (and very rarely heroines) were central to Babylonia, Iceland, and Israel. Often, the greater the socioeconomic injustice or turmoil in a society, the more “super human” the leaders became.

  • Greek concepts :

    • Nationalism/Governing: “He serves me most, who serves his country best,” Iliad (Book X)

    • Special: “the leader, mingling with the vulgar host, is in the common mass of matter lost.” Odyssey (Book III)

    • Justice and judgment

    • Wisdom and counsel

    • Shrewdness and cunning

    • Valor


Great man perspective 1900 s 1920 s

“Great Man” Perspective1900’s-1920’s

  • Key questions: Is leadership an innate ability?

    Are leaders born to lead?

  • Leadership studies highly biased towards political, military, aristocratic, or cultural elites. Leadership was considered an art, for which some fortunate people had an inbuilt genius.

  • Mechanistic and managerial perspectives

    • Fredrick Taylor - Introduced the scientific analysis of tasks and job-design time-study methods for managers to use in “managing” workers.

    • Henry Fayol - Introduced principles of management focused on command/control & coordination.

    • Max Weber - Defined a bureaucratic system based on rational system, not hereditary rule.


Trait perspective 1940s 1950 s

Trait Perspective1940s-1950’s

  • Key Question: What traits are common to all leaders?

  • During WWII, an essential question on the US mind was, “What traits do a nation’s (military) leaders need to win the war?” Researchers began to view leadership as a set of facilitative “traits”:

    Leadership is “…the process of arranging a situation so that various

    members of a group, including the leader, can achieve common

    goals with maximum economy and a minimum of time and work”

    (Bellows, 1949).

  • The U.S. government, through defense-research spending, began subsidizing study of leadership effectiveness, which increased interest throughout higher education.


Many leadership traits

Stogdill

(1948)

Mann

(1959)

Stogdill

(1974)

Lord, DeVader, & Alliger

(1986)

Kirkpatrick & Locke

(1991)

Masculinity

Adjustment

Dominance

Extroversion

Conservatism

Persistence

Insight

Initiative

Self-Confidence

Responsibility

Cooperativeness

Tolerance

Influence

Sociability

Alertness

Insight

Responsibility

Initiative

Persistence

Self-Confidence

Sociability

Motivation

Integrity

Confidence

Cognitive Ability

Task Knowledge

Masculinity

Dominance

Many Leadership Traits


Leadership traits distilled

Leadership Traits Distilled

  • Intelligence- Intellectual ability including verbal, perceptual, and reasoning capabilities

  • Self-Confidence - Ability to be certain about one’s competencies and skills

  • Determination - The desire to get the job done (i.e., initiative, persistence, dominance, drive)

  • Integrity - The quality of honesty and trustworthiness

  • Sociability - Leader’s inclination to seek out pleasant social relationships


Strengths trait theories

Strengths(Trait Theories)

  • Intuitively appealing

    • Perception that leaders are different in that they possess special traits

    • People “need” to view leaders as gifted

  • Credibility due to a century of research support

  • Highlights leadership component in the leadership process

  • Deeper level understanding of how leader/personality related to leadership process

  • Provides benchmarksfor what to look for in a leader


Criticisms trait theories

Criticisms(Trait Theories)

  • Fails to delimita definitive list of leadership traits

  • Doesn’t take into account situational effects

  • List of most important leadership traits is highlysubjective

  • Research fails to look at traits in relationship to leadership outcomes

  • Not useful for training & development


Behavioral perspective focus on skill style 1950 s 1970 s

Behavioral Perspective (Focus on Skill & Style 1950’s-1970’s

  • Key Question: What do Leaders Do?

  • Behavior-focused perspectives on leadership examine the things leaders do or the patterns in those things

    • Leadership defined as acts by persons which influence other persons in a shared direction. (Seaman (1960)

    • The essential difference between a leader and an executive is the degree of personal initiative and personal risk that such initiative involves” (Jennings, 1960, page 16).

    • “Leadership is a position within society which is defined by the ability of the incumbent to guide and structure the collective behavior patterns of some or all of its members …It is at all times relational, interpersonal, and is based upon influence…” (Eidinger, 1967, page 15).


The u m and osu studies

The U-M and OSU Studies

  • Throughout the 1950s-1960s, Ohio State and University of Michigan researchers tried to create a universal theory of leadership by examining how leaders combined task and relationship behaviors. Stogdill and his colleagues began examining leader behavior, rather than traits alone. Importantly, the emphasis was on describing what leaders do (how they behave).

  • Typically the research involved having subordinates in industrial, military, and educational organizations complete questionnaires (Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire (LBDQ)– consisting of some 150 items) about their leaders.

  • Ultimately, results were contradictory and unclear. Some research suggested every situation required a combination of high-task and high-relationship orientation, but other studies provided conflicting information.


The ohio state osu studies

The Ohio State (OSU) Studies

  • Researchers found that questionnaire responses indicated two types of leader behaviors: initiating structure and consideration.

    • Initiating structurebehaviors were task behaviors (e.g., scheduling work activities, defining role responsibilities, giving structure to the work context).

    • Consideration involved behaviors such as building trust, respect, and camaraderie between leaders and followers and among followers.


The michigan u m studies

The Michigan (U-M) Studies

  • Research on the impact of leaders’ behaviors on small group contexts described two types of leadership behaviors: employee orientation and production orientation.

    • Employee orientation behaviors, (like “consideration behaviors” identified in OSU studies), describe the behavior of leaders who show a strong human relations orientation with subordinates.

      Production orientation behaviors stress technical and production aspects of a job.


Behavioral a question of style leadership grid theory blake mouton 1964

Behavioral: A Question of StyleLeadership Grid Theory (Blake &Mouton, 1964)

  • Blake and Moutin’s work drew heavily upon the early style research; sought to identify the proper integration of task- and relationship behaviors.

  • Their “management grid” described two dimensions along which managers and leaders may vary, 1-9. These measures interacted to create a grid describing five pure style types.


The leadership grid

The Leadership Grid®

High

9

1, 9

9, 9

Country Club Management

Team Management

8

7

6

5, 5

Concern for People

5

Middle-of-the-Road

4

3

Impoverished Management

Authority-Compliance Mgmt.

2

1, 1

9, 1

1

Low

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Concern for Results

High

Low


Authority compliance 9 1

Authority-Compliance (9,1)

Definition: Efficiency in operations results from arranging conditions of work such that human interference is minimal

Role Focus: More emphasis on task and job requirements and less emphasis on people

  • Communicating with subordinates outside task instructions not emphasized

  • Results driven; People regarded as tools to that end


Country club 1 9

Country Club (1,9)

  • Definition: Thoughtful attention to the needs of people leads to a comfortable, friendly organization atmosphere and work tempo

  • Role Focus: Low concern for task accomplishment coupled with high concern for interpersonal relationships

    • De-emphasizes production; leaders stress the attitudes and feelings of people

    • Positive climate fostered by being agreeable, eager to help, comforting, noncontroversial


Impoverished 1 1

Impoverished (1,1)

Definition: Minimal effort exerted to get work done is appropriate to sustain organizational membership

Role Focus: Leader unconcerned with both task and interpersonal relationships

  • Going through the motions, but uninvolved and withdrawn

  • Have little contact with followers and are described as indifferent, noncommittal, resigned, and apathetic


Middle of the road 5 5

Middle-of-the-Road (5,5)

Definition:Adequate organizational performance possible through balancing the necessity of getting work done while maintaining satisfactory morale .

Role Focus: Leaders who are compromisers; have intermediate concern for task and people

  • To achieve equilibrium, leader avoids conflict while emphasizing moderate levels of production and interpersonal relationships

  • Described as expedient; prefers the middle ground, soft-pedals disagreement


Team 9 9

Team (9,9)

Definition: Work accomplished through committed people; interdependence via a “common stake” in the organization’s purpose, which leads to relationships of trust and respect

Role Focus:Strong emphasis on both tasks and interpersonal relationships

  • Promotes high degree of participation and teamwork

  • Leader stimulates participation, acts determined, makes priorities clear, follows through, etc.


Strengths style theories

Strengths (Style theories)

  • Broadened the field of leadership studies to include what leaders do, rather than merely who they are.

  • Easily applied.

  • A wide range of studies give some credibility to the findings of style-researchers, particularly regarding the effects on follower/subordinate satisfaction.

  • The essential elements of the style approach—task and relationship—influenced subsequent generations of leadership research (e.g., Situational Theory).


Criticisms style theories

Criticisms (Style theories)

  • Hasn’t adequately shown how leaders’ styles are associated with performance outcomes.

  • There is no universal leadership style.

  • Implies that the most effective leadership behavior is the Team Management style (9,9), when in fact there is little evidence overall in support.


Behavioral a question of skill 1955 reemergence 1990 s

Behavioral: A Question of Skill(1955, reemergence 1990’s)

  • Actually more about what a leader is capable of doingthan what a leaderdoes…

  • Three categories of skills (Katz 1955):

    • Technical skill

    • Human Skill

    • Conceptual Skill


Basic administrative skills katz 1955

Basic Administrative SkillsKatz (1955)

Conceptual Skills (ideas)

Human Skills (people)

Technical Skills (things)

Manager

Director

VP

Exec VP

CEO


Skills model mumford zaccaro et al 2000

Skills Model Mumford, Zaccaro, et al (2000)

Individual Attributes

Crystallized Cognitive Abilities

Motivation

Personality

Competencies

Problem-Solving Skills

Social Judgment Skills

Knowledge

Leadership Outcomes

Effective Problem Solving

Performance

Career Expectations

Environmental Influences


Strengths skills perspective

Strengths (skills perspective)

  • Made leadership available to anyone; can be developed and improved

  • Complicated enough to capture dynamics of many leadership situations, social skills, problem-solving, environment, etc.

  • Lends itself to teaching other leaders


Criticisms skills perspective

Criticisms (skills perspective)

  • Skills extend beyond the bounds of leadership so theories are less precise

  • Weak in predictive value. Skills may correlate with leaders’ success, but HOW do they influence performance?


Situational perspective first emerged in 1970 s

Situational Perspective(First emerged in 1970’s)

  • Key Question: How does the situation influence leadership effectiveness?

  • Situational Leadership asserts that different situations demand different kinds of leadership. To be an effective leader, leaders must fit their style to the demands of different situations.


Situational leadership si hersey and blanchard late 1960 s

Situational Leadership (SI)Hersey and Blanchard (late 1960’s)

  • Built on the work of the OSU and U-M teams.

  • This model considers two components:

    • Leadership stylemay be defined as the behavior pattern of an individual who attempts to influence others. It includes both directive (task) behaviors and supportive (relationship) behaviors.

    • Development levelof subordinates refers to the degree to which employees/followers have the competence and commitment necessary to accomplish a given task. Employees are at a high level of development if they are interested in their work, and know how to do their work. Employees with low levels of development are those with high commitment, but low competence.


A semi historical romp through prevailing perspectives on leadership

  • The behavior pattern of an individual who attempts to influence others; includes:

    • Directive behaviors - Help group members in goal achievement via one-way communication through:

      • Giving directions

      • Establishing goals & how to achieve them

      • Methods of evaluation & time lines

      • Defining roles

    • Supportive behaviors - Assist group members via two-way communication in feeling comfortable with themselves, co-workers, and situation


A semi historical romp through prevailing perspectives on leadership

  • Effective leaders are those who exercise appropriate degree of task orientation and relationship orientation relative to the maturity of followers. Specifically, as the level of follower maturity increases, effective leader behavior involves less structuring and less social support.

  • Based on combinations of these two dimensions, leadership styles can be divided into four distinct categories:

    • High directive-low supportive (S1) = “directing”

    • High directive-high supportive (S2) = “coaching”

    • High supportive-low directive (S3) = “supporting”

    • Low supportive-low directive (S4) = “delegating”

  • Employees are conceptualized as moving backwards and forwards along the continuum of development depending upon the task at hand.

  • The job of leaders, therefore, is to diagnose where employees are in their development, then adapt the leader’s style to match the needs of the follower.


  • A semi historical romp through prevailing perspectives on leadership

    S 3

    S 2

    Coaching

    Supporting

    High Supportive

    Low Directive

    High Directive

    High Supportive

    Supportive Behavior

    S 1

    Directing

    S 4

    High Directive

    Low Supportive

    Delegating

    Low

    High

    DirectiveBehavior

    Low Supportive

    Low Directive

    D4

    D3

    D2

    D1

    Low

    High

    Moderate

    Developed

    Developing

    High

    Developmental

    Level of

    Followers


    Strengths situational leadership

    Strengths (Situational Leadership)

    • Marketplace approval. Situational leadership is perceived as providing a credible model for training employees to become effective leaders.

    • Practicality. Situational leadership is a straightforward approach that is easily understood and applied in a variety of settings.

    • Prescriptive value. Situational leadership clearly outlines what you should and should not do in various settings.

    • Leader flexibility. Situational leadership stresses that effective leaders are those who can change their style based on task requirements and subordinate needs.

    • Differential treatment. Situational leadership is based on the premise that leaders need to treat each subordinate according to his/her unique needs.


    Criticisms situational leadership

    Criticisms (Situational Leadership)

    • Lack of an empirical foundation raises theoretical considerations regarding the validityof the approach

    • Further research is required to determine how commitment and competenceare conceptualized for each developmental level

    • Conceptualizationof commitment itself is very unclear

    • Replication studies fail to support basic prescriptions of situational leadership model

    • Does notaccount for how particular demographics influence the leader-subordinate prescriptions of the model

    • Fails toadequately address the issue of one-to-one versus group leadership in an organizational setting

    • Questionnaires are biased in favor of situational leadership


    Contingency theory fiedler 1964

    Contingency TheoryFiedler (1964)

    • Key question: What style of leadership is most likely to be successful in a specific situation?

    • All about a Leader-Match-- Effective leadership is contingentupon matching the right leadership style to the situation


    Least preferred coworker lpc measure

    Least Preferred Coworker (LPC) Measure

    • Low LPC’s are task motivated.

      • Gain self esteem primarily from productivity

      • Attend to interpersonal relationships but secondarily

      • Primary needs: accomplishing goals

      • Secondary needs: getting along with people

  • Mid LPC’s are socio-independent

    • Self-directed

    • Not overly concerned with task or with how people think of them

    • More removed from situation and act more independently than low or high LPC

  • High LPC’s are motivated by Relationships

    • Major satisfaction in interpersonal relationships

    • Sees good qualities even in LPC

    • Attends to tasks after relationships are in good shape


  • Contingency model fiedler 1967

    Contingency Model (Fiedler, 1967)

    Leader-Member Relations

    Task Structure

    Position Power

    Preferred Leadership Style


    Transactional perspective 1970 s

    Transactional Perspective1970’s

    • Origins lie in early 20th-century “management-sciences”. In its original form, the perspective viewed management in economic terms – as exchanges of rewards for good performance, punishments for poor performance.

    • Heavily influenced by Frederick Taylor’s Five Principles of Scientific Management:

      • Shift all responsibility for the organization of work from the worker to the manager.

      • Use scientific methods to determine the most efficient way of doing work; design the workers’ tasks accordingly, specifying the precise way in which it is to be done.

      • Select the best person to perform the job thus designed;

      • Train the worker to do work efficiently;

      • Monitor worker performance, intervening when exceptionally productive or deficient.


    A semi historical romp through prevailing perspectives on leadership

    In the early 1970s, theorists Jacobs (1970) & Hollander (1978) developed an updated transactional theory of leadership. Their model:

    • Brought followers into focus by highlighting power relations, and the negotiations necessary among people of unequal power and different agendas.

    • Held that followers are significantly involved in negotiating any exchange or transaction that results in a decision or a course of action.

    • Acknowledged the fact that followers have minds of their own, and that their opinions and ideas also influence the leader: that leadership is, in fact, a social system characterized by feedback between leaders and followers.


    A semi historical romp through prevailing perspectives on leadership

    • Some political scientists also became interested in the exchange model of leadership because it seemed to:

      • 1) appeal to the discipline’s interest in analysis of influence relationships,

      • 2) reflect the pluralistic underpinnings of American democracy, and

      • 3) imply a more powerful role for followers. In exchanging promises for votes, for example, the transactional leader works within the framework of the self-interests of his or her constituency, thus, followers are alleged to wield as much power as leaders.

    • The leader’s effectiveness, therefore, is defined as the extent to which he or she “delivers” on the promises made to followers in exchange for their support; where delivery is achieved, reciprocal support is presumed to grow, further enhancing the leader’s power, stature, and capability of delivering on future promises made to followers.

    • Advocates of exchange emphasized its normative nature, its efficiency considerations, and its beneficial implications for followership.


    Leader member exchange theory lmx

    Leader-Member Exchange Theory (LMX)

    • Key Question: What kinds of relationships contribute to success?

    • LMX theory conceptualizes leadership as a process centered in the interactions between leaders and followers.

      • LMX theory first described by Dansereau, Graen, & Haga (1975), Graen & Cashman (1975), and Graen (1976)

      • Theory has undergone a number of revisions since its inception and continues to be of interest to researchers

      • LMX theory challenges the assumption that leaders treat followers in a collective way.


    Phases in leadership making graen uhl bien 1995

    Phases in Leadership MakingGraen & Uhl-Bien (1995)

    Phase 1

    Phase 2

    Phase 3

    Stranger

    Acquaintance

    Partner

    Roles

    Scripted

    Tested

    Negotiated

    Influences

    One Way

    Mixed

    Reciprocal

    Exchanges

    Low Quality

    Medium Quality

    High Quality

    Interests

    Self

    Self / Other

    Group

    TIME


    Phase 1

    Phase 1

    Stranger

    • Interactions rule bound

    • Rely on contractual relationships

    • Relate to each other within prescribed

    • organizational roles

    • Experience lower quality exchanges

    • Subordinate motives directed

    • toward self-interest


    Phase 2

    Phase 2

    Acquaintance

    • Offer by leader/subordinate for improved career-oriented social exchanges

    • Testing period of taking on new roles and leader providing new challenges

    • Shift from formalized interactions to new ways of relating

    • Quality of exchanges improve along with greater trust and respect

    • Less focus on self-interest, more on goals of the group


    Phase 3

    Mature Partnership

    • Marked by high-quality LMX exchanges

    • Experience high degree of mutual trust, respect, and obligation toward one another

    • Tested relationship that is dependable

    • High degree of reciprocity between leader and subordinate

    • May depend on each other for favors and special assistance

    • Highly developed patterns of relating that produce positive outcomes

    Phase 3


    Strengths lmx

    Strengths(LMX)

    • LMX theory validates our experience of how people within organizations relate to each other and the leader

    • LMX theory is the only leadership approach that makes the dyadic relationship the centerpiece of the leadership process

    • LMX theory directs our attention to the importance of communication

    • Solidresearch foundation on how the practice of LMX theory is related to positive organizational outcomes


    Criticisms lmx

    Criticisms(LMX)

    • Inadvertently supports the development of privileged groups in the workplace; appears unfair and discriminatory

    • The basic theoretical ideas of LMX are not fully developed

    • Because of various scales and levels of analysis, measurement of leader-member exchanges is being questioned


    Transformational perspective

    Transformational Perspective

    • James MacGregor Burns, in Leadership (1978), advanced a notion of leadership known as transformational leadership theory.

      • Burns: “[Transformational leadership] appeals to the moral values of followers…and occurs when one or more persons engage with others in such a way that leaders and followers raise one another to higher levels of motivation and morality” (p 20).

      • Transformational leadership refers to the process whereby an individual engages with others to create a bond which raises the level of motivation and morality in both the leader and the follower – typically for the purpose of bringing substantial change to the organization.


    A semi historical romp through prevailing perspectives on leadership

    • Burns saw leadership as a structured interaction between leader and followers that permits significant social processes of change.

    • Transformational changes within society embrace material, psychological, cultural, and institutional dimensions.

    • When the transforming leader engages others by exploiting their higher-order needs, the resulting collective act produces a relationship of mutual stimulation and elevation that converts followers into leaders and may convert leaders into moral agents.


    Types of leadership defined burns 1978

    Types of Leadership DefinedBurns (1978)

    LAISSEZ-FAIRE

    Non-leadership. Leaders make no real attempt to move or to meet followers’ needs

    TRANSACTIONAL

    Focuses on the exchanges that occur between leaders and their followers

    TRANSFORMATIONAL

    Process of engaging with others to create a connection that increases motivation and morality


    Transformational vs transactional

    Transformational vs. Transactional

    • Transacting leadership motivates followers by appealing to their self-interest. It makes use of three general strategies:

      • contingent rewards;

      • active management by exception;

      • passive management by exception.

        Together, these approaches may induce follower compliance, but is unlikely to generate enthusiasm and commitment.

    • Transformational leaders (as described by Burns and, later, by Bass) evoke from their followers feelings of trust, admiration, loyalty and respect by:

      • Making them aware of the importance of task outcomes;

      • Inducing them to transcend their own self-interest for the sake of the group (“Leadership is nothing if not linked with collective purpose”);

      • Activating their higher-order needs.

    • For Burns, the transforming leader focuses on ends, while the transacting leader negotiates and bargains over the means. 


    Transformational leadership bass 1985

    Transformational Leadership Bass (1985)

    Laissez-Faire

    Transactional

    Transformational

    Factor 1

    Idealized Influence

    (Charisma)

    Factor 7

    Laissez-Faire

    Nontransactional

    Factor 5

    Contingent Reward

    ConstructiveTransactions

    Factor 6

    Active Mgmt. by Exception

    Passive Mgmt. by Exception

    Corrective Transactions

    Factor 2

    Inspirational

    Motivation

    Factor 3

    Intellectual

    Stimulation

    Factor 4

    Individualized

    Consideration


    Non leadership factor

    Non-leadership Factor

    Laissez-Faire

    The absence of leadership. A hands-off, let-things-ride approach. Refers to a leader who abdicates responsibility, delays decisions, gives no feedback, and makes little effort to help followers satisfy their needs.


    Transactional leadership factors

    Transactional Leadership Factors

    • Contingent Reward

    • The exchange process between leaders and followers in which effort by followers is exchanged for specified rewards

    • Management by Exception

    • Leadership that involves corrective criticism, negative feedback, and

    • negative reinforcement

      • Active- Watches follower closely to identify mistakes or rule violations

      • Passive - Intervenes only after standards have not been met or problems have arisen


    Transformational leadership factors

    Transformational Leadership Factors

    The 4 “I”s

    Individualized Influence

    Describes leaders who act as strong role models for followers

    Inspirational Motivation

    Leaders who communicate high expectations to followers, inspiring them through motivation to commitment and engagement in the shared vision of the organization

    Intellectual Stimulation

    Stimulates followers to be creative and innovative; challenges their own beliefs and values and those of leader and organization

    Individualized Consideration

    Leaders who provide a supportive climate in which they listen carefully to the needs of followers


    Charisma

    Charisma

    Charisma - A special personality characteristic that gives superhuman or exceptional powers and is reserved for a few, is of divine origin, and results in the person being treated as a leader

    • Dominant

    • Desire to influence

    • Confident

    • Strong moral values

    Personality Effect on

    Characteristics Behaviors Followers

    • Trust in Leader’s ideology

    • Belief similarity to leader

    • Unquestioning acceptance

    • Affection toward leader

    • Obedience

    • Identification

    • Emotional Involvement

    • Heightened goals

    • Increased confidence

    • Sets Strong Role Model

    • Shows Competence

    • Articulates Goals

    • Communicates High Expectations

    • Expresses Confidence

    • Arouses Motives


    Bass s reapplication of burns

    Bass’s Reapplication of Burns

    • Bass accused Burns of three errors: (1) Burns did not pay attention to the portfolio of followers' needs and wants, (2) Burns restricted transformational leadership to moral ends, and, (3) Burns set up a single continuum running from transactional to transformational leaderly types.

    • Bass has argued that transformational leadership is universally applicable. He proposed, that regardless of culture, transformational leaders inspire followers to transcend their own self-interests for the good of the group or organization, followers become motivated to expend greater effort than would usually be expected.

    • Bass contends that "most leaders do both (transformation and transaction) in different amounts" and that "transformational and transactional leadership are likely to be displayed by the same individual in different amounts and intensities" (p. 26). 

    • "The transactional leaders works within the organizational culture as it exists; the transformational leader changes the organizational culture." The transformational leader even "changes the social warp and woof of reality."

    • In sum, transformational is hierarchically superior to transactional leadership valuation, but all leaders practice some form or degree of transactional leadership, too.


    Full range of leadership model

    Full Range of Leadership Model

    Nonleadership

    LF Laissez-Faire

    Transactional

    MBE-P Mgmt by Exception Passive

    MBE-A Mgmt by Exception Active

    CR Contingent Reward

    Transformational

    4 “I”s

    Idealized Influence

    Inspirational Motivation

    Intellectual Stimulation

    Individualized Consideration

    Effective

    4 “I”s

    CR

    Passive

    MBE- A

    Active

    MBE- P

    Frequency

    LF

    Ineffective

    Source: Bass & Avolio (1994)


    Additive effect of tl

    Additive Effect of TL

    TL motivates followers beyond the expected by:

    raising consciousness about the value and importance of specific and idealized goals

    transcending self-interest for the good of the organization

    addressing higher-level needs

    Transformational Leadership

    Individualized

    Influence

    Inspirational

    Motivation

    Intellectual

    Stimulation

    Individualized

    Consideration

    +

    +

    +

    Transactional Leadership

    Contingent Reward

    Performance Beyond

    Expectations

    Expected

    Outcomes

    +

    Management by

    Exception

    Source: Bass & Avolio (1990)


    Recent elaborating on transformational theory

    Recent Elaborating on Transformational Theory

    • Bennis and Nanus (1985) studied ninety top corporate and industry leaders. Their list of newly discovered leader traits include: logical thinking, persistence, empowerment, and self-control.

    • But, most of all they rediscovered transformational (leaders) as being different from transactional (managers).  The transformation is to make followers into self-empowered leaders, and into change agents. The leader's job is to articulate Vision and Values clearly so the new self-empowered leaders know where to go.

    • The Traits of a Transformational leader are the “4 I's:”

      • Idealized Influence (leader becomes a role model)

      • Inspirational Motivation (team spirit, motivate, and provide meaning and challenge).

      • Intellectual Stimulation (creativity & innovation)

      • Individual Consideration (mentoring)


    Strengths transformational model

    Strengths (Transformational Model)

    • Broadly researched.TL has been widely researched, including a large body of qualitative research centering on prominent leaders and CEOs in major firms.

    • Intuitive appeal. People are attracted to TL because it makes sense to them.

    • Process-focused. TL treats leadership as a process occurring between followers and leaders.

    • Expansive leadership view. TL provides a broader view of leadership that augments other leadership models.

    • Emphasizes follower. TL emphasizes followers’ needs, values, and morals.

    • Effectiveness. Evidence supports that TL is an effective form of leadership.


    Criticisms transformational model

    Criticisms (Transformational Model)

    • Lacks conceptual clarity

      • Dimensions are not clearly delimited

      • Parameters of TL overlap with similar conceptualizations of leadership

    • Measurement questioned

      • Validity of MLQ not fully established

      • Some transformational factors are not unique solely to the transformational model

    • TL treats leadership more as a personality trait or predisposition than a behavior that can be taught

    • TL is elitistand antidemocratic

    • Suffers from heroic leadership bias

    • TL is based primarily on qualitative data

    • Has the potential to be abused


    Summary 8 categories of leadership theory

    SUMMARY: 8 Categories of Leadership Theory

    1. “Great Man” Theories

    2. Trait Theories

    3. Contingency Theories

    4. Situational Theories

    5. Behavioral Theories

    7. Management Theories (also known as Transactional)

    8. Relationship Theories (also known as Transformational)


  • Login