1 / 22

SMETE.ORG and the National SMETE Digital Library

SMETE.ORG and the National SMETE Digital Library. Brandon Muramatsu Project Director, SMETE.ORG mura@smete.org. Outline. SMETE.ORG NSDL Core Integration 2001-2003 Brief description of Utah State’s Instructional Architect project. SMETE.ORG Prototype.

freya
Download Presentation

SMETE.ORG and the National SMETE Digital Library

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. SMETE.ORGand theNational SMETE Digital Library Brandon Muramatsu Project Director, SMETE.ORG mura@smete.org

  2. Outline • SMETE.ORG • NSDL Core Integration 2001-2003 • Brief description of Utah State’s Instructional Architect project

  3. SMETE.ORG Prototype • Develop a Prototype National SMETE Digital Library (1998-2001) • Test interoperability of federated searches & shared services with partners • Expand requirements analysis to include K–12 in addition to higher education • Develop criteria and standards to assess the impact of digital learning resources across disciplines • Implement community feedback systems, evaluate services

  4. SMETE.ORG Vision A Digital Learning Community • SMETE.ORG is an e-learning partnership that: • Offers a comprehensive collection of SMET education content and services to learners educators and academic policy-makers • Serves as the integrative organization and distribution mechanism for pedagogical material through a tightly coupled federation of digital libraries • Promotes educational reform through participatory communities of learners

  5. SMETE.ORG Alliance SMETE Collections AAAS (BEN) BioQUEST DLESE Eisenhower National Clearinghouse Math Forum Mathematics Association of America (MathDL) NEEDS University of California System Industry Cisco Eduprise (iLumina Collection) John Wiley & Sons Sun Microsystems WebCT Texas Instruments

  6. SMETE.ORG Alliance (cont.) Community Building Services Coalition for Networked Information ILT Interactive University National Action Council for Minorities inEngineering Project Kaleidoscope SRI Research Utah State University University of Maryland–Baltimore County

  7. Other Collaborators • AccessExcellence • Columbia University • MERIT & Michigan Teacher Network • MERLOT • University of Missouri-Columbia

  8. Key Features of the National SMETE Digital Library at www.smete.org • Users can… • Search for learning resources • Catalog (add) learning resources • Based upon emerging international IEEE standards • Evaluate the quality of learning resources • Using “user” reviews • Using “expert” reviews • Form a community • Through partner collections and activities • Building upon PKAL workshops and seminars • Research on adapters of others’ learning resources

  9. SMETE.ORG Systems Development Current Technical Base: PHP and MS SQL Server Future, Summer 2001: Oracle8i, Java servlets • Expanding services and features • Based upon NEEDS platform • Developing core system based upon IEEE/IMS Learning Object Metadata Standards • Adding user comments and user feedback mechanisms • Implementing discussion systems • Implementing customized user profiles • Expanding Core Collection • Especially Engineering and Physical Sciences Core Collection* Engineering 58% Chemistry 21% Physics 14% Math 5% Other 2% *Significant additional Math and Science content is available from SMETE.ORG Alliance partners

  10. SMETE.ORG Activities • On-going needs assessment and other evaluation projects • Working with SMETE.ORG Alliance members to support interoperability • Looking for connections between projects and possible participants • Working with NSDL Workgroups and Core Integration Systems projects • Developing recommendations that cut across all NSDL projects

  11. Federated Search • Common database of records • Pointers to either external or internal content • Could be cataloged in a single location • Could be “contributed” or “harvested” (OAI model) • Separate databases with a search gateway • Could search from any location to any location • Progress: • Simple http post mechanism for learning resources, more complex mechanism under consideration • Z39.50 (developed) and Open Archive Initiative (under development)

  12. User Services • Recommender Systems under development • Instructional Architect at Utah State for building new instructional materials from contents of SMETE.ORG and its collections • User-to-User and User-to-Learning Resource • Automated learning object recommendation system • Automated people matching system based on similar learning and educational goals • Requires User Profiles

  13. User Services (cont.) • Common/shared user profiles under discussion • SMETE.ORG is developing a white paper on what we need for our “digital learning community” • Our focus is not on digital rights management • We plan to work with partners (e.g., Columbia University) who have the expertise in this area

  14. SMETE.ORG Technology Research • Entry Vocabulary • Recommendation of context-appropriate search terms • Knowledge Management • Integrated subject taxonomies based on existing community-developed subject taxonomies

  15. NSDL—Core Integration* 2001-2003 • General Areas of Responsibility DLESE Cornell-Site for Science Management & Coordination “Loose Integration” Community and Education Evaluation “Tight Federation” SMETE.ORG Alliance *Developed at NSDL Coordinating Commitee Meeting, Santa Barbara, CA, January 2001

  16. NSDL—Core Integration Status • Well…things are still under discussion • Things we know… • $5M over two years is available from NSF • Proposal due June 6, 2001 • Deployment of NSDL by Fall 2002 • Things we believe… • Next proposal will be “collaborative”

  17. The SMETE.ORG Alliance… • Believes the NSDL should… • Cover science, mathematics, engineering and technology not just “Science” • And we should emphasize the interdisciplinary and interconnectedness of learning materials • Focus on teaching and learning not only research and “primary source materials” • Focus on the social aspects as much, if not more than the technical aspects of building the NSDL • Be tightly federated/integrated to allow users the best possible experience

  18. The Instructional ArchitectDavid Wileywiley@cc.usu.eduMimi ReckerUtah State University

  19. The Instructional Architect • Builds Upon Core Services provided at SMETE.ORG • Current services end after locating a resource • Novice users often need more support to make instructional use of resources

  20. Tool Set • Search (provided by SMETE.ORG) • Inspection / Selection • Object Recommender • Combination Tool / Instr. Design Wizards • Reflection / Rating Tool • Person Recommender

  21. Tools currently in development • Search (provided by SMETE.ORG) • Inspection / Selection • Object Recommender • Combination Tool / Instr. Design Wizards • Reflection / Rating Tool • Person Recommender

  22. Contacting SMETE.ORG www.smete.org Alice Agogino, Principal Investigator agogino@smete.org Brandon Muramatsu, Project Director mura@smete.org

More Related