1 / 12

Lessons from Epi Midterm (S05)

Lessons from Epi Midterm (S05). Reflections +. Validity is the Goal. Axiom: There is no such thing as a perfect test (Chap 4) Corollary 1: All test results require interpretation Corollary 2: A test does not have to be perfect to be useful. Why name appears outside only.

freya
Download Presentation

Lessons from Epi Midterm (S05)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Lessons from Epi Midterm (S05) Reflections +

  2. Validity is the Goal • Axiom: There is no such thing as a perfect test (Chap 4) • Corollary 1: All test results require interpretation • Corollary 2: A test does not have to be perfect to be useful

  3. Why name appears outside only • Blinding increases likelihood grade will not be based on prior belief  increasing validity • Blinding does not remove random error

  4. Q1 • Why was kappa was given? • Goal is interpretation (not arithmetic)

  5. Q2 • Q2 • Prevalence • Incidence proportion (risk) • Incidence rate • Lay people may refer to all these as “rates” • But we know better • Rate  risk when disease is rare • Prevalence  Incidence × Duration

  6. Q3 • Group project has some benefits • But leaves some individuals behind

  7. Q4 • Vital statistics in an open population • No problems in calculations

  8. Question 5 “By How Much?” • Which population has a higher rate? • And “By how much?” • Introduces the concepts in Chapter 8 • Answer on exam showed good intuition

  9. Ways to quantify differences • Relative difference • Absolute difference • “Impact” of exposure

  10. Relative Difference • Relative difference derived by ratios • e.g., “Twice the rate” • Suppose • Group 1 rate is 200 per 100,000 • Group 0 rate is 100 per 100,000 • Let RR represent the relative risk

  11. Absolute Difference • Absolute difference derived by subtraction • Let RD represent the risk difference

  12. Potential Impact • There are two ways to discuss “impact” • Let’s consider the effect of the exposure in exposed cases • Assume difference in risk entirely due to exposure • Population 1 risk would revert to the population 0 risk if exposure was averted • This is the Attributable Fraction in the exposed (AFe) • Illustrative example:

More Related