1 / 31

epso complaints

epso complaints. Results from the questionnaire. Complaints trajectory. Cork 2009 Candidatures working group Questionnaire Brussels 5/2/2010 Reporting to Epso. Position of the inspectorate. Most inspectorates can investigate individual complaints ; - some directly involved

freira
Download Presentation

epso complaints

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. epsocomplaints Resultsfrom the questionnaire epso complaints 5 2 2010

  2. Complaintstrajectory • Cork 2009 • Candidaturesworkinggroup • Questionnaire • Brussels 5/2/2010 • Reporting to Epso epso complaints 5 2 2010

  3. Position of the inspectorate • Most inspectoratescaninvestigateindividualcomplaints; - somedirectlyinvolved - someinvolvedonly as appealinstance - someonly in severeincidents epso complaints 5 2 2010

  4. Role of Inspectorate in care provider’scomplaints procedure • Miscellaneous & variouslevels • SometimesInspectorate must be mentioned in complaints procedure (address, contact number): NorthernIreland, Flanders (…) epso complaints 5 2 2010

  5. Legislationoncomplaints inHealth Care • Legal basis for the partiesinvolved: -complainant -care provider -inspectorate (ombudsman) Often: lawonpatients’ rights. epso complaints 5 2 2010

  6. Information of the public • In all countries public is informed of the possibility to lodgecomplaint • More orlessactiveinformation • Variousways of information: -posters, folders, leaflets -websites -other (media, conferences,…) epso complaints 5 2 2010

  7. Redirecting a complainant • Reasons to redirect: -closer to complaint & complainant -local expertise -opportunity to improve care epso complaints 5 2 2010

  8. Notredirecting a complainant • Reasonsfornotredirecting: -vulnerability -frompillar to post -closer & easier follow-up epso complaints 5 2 2010

  9. Redirecting to whom? • Care provider • Ombudsman • Complaintscommission epso complaints 5 2 2010

  10. Judging a complaint • Founded-unfounded • Possibleconsequences? epso complaints 5 2 2010

  11. Howcomplaints are investigated (I) • Askadditionalwritteninformation • Writeorcall care provider • Askforwritten follow-up of complaintby care provider epso complaints 5 2 2010

  12. Howcomplaints are investigated (II) • Visit care provider • Talk to complainant • Includecomplaint in nextregularinspection • Holdformal meeting with care provider epso complaints 5 2 2010

  13. Revealingidentity? (I) • “Retaliation”, whistleblowing • Care provider’sability to resolveproblem • Howanonymous is anonymous? epso complaints 5 2 2010

  14. Revealingidentity? (II) • No identity, noinvestigation • Optionsforcomplainant • OptionsforInspectorate epso complaints 5 2 2010

  15. Complainantunknown to Inspectorate • Investigation in spite of anonymous nature • Anonymity →noinvestigation epso complaints 5 2 2010

  16. Follow-up • Follow-up of aninvestigatedcomplaint: -written follow-up by care provider -include follow-up in regularinspection later on -specific follow-up inspection -contactingcomplainant epso complaints 5 2 2010

  17. Reportingonanindividualcomplaint • Written reports in all countries • Sent to care provider • Sent to complainant • Publishedon website (…) epso complaints 5 2 2010

  18. Registration • In general and systematicway: most countries • Fragmented: 1 country epso complaints 5 2 2010

  19. General report • Miscellaneous • Only 50% of countries report onregular basis and in generaloncomplaintsinvestigation epso complaints 5 2 2010

  20. Makeuse of complaints • Includeinformationfromcomplaints in futureinspection programs orinstruments • Noteveryone’slogic epso complaints 5 2 2010

  21. Training Inspectors • Specific training fordealingwithcomplaints • Only 50% of epsomembers train inspectorsfordealingwithcomplaints • →Epso training? epso complaints 5 2 2010

  22. Questionsforreflection epso complaints 5 2 2010

  23. 1. Supervisor’sinvolvement in complaints procedure • First level • Second level (appealinstance) • Notinvolved epso complaints 5 2 2010

  24. 2. Redirectingcomplaints • A. From supervisor to care provider • B. Care provider mentioning supervisor as appealinstance epso complaints 5 2 2010

  25. 3. Informing the public • Most effectivemethods of informing public? epso complaints 5 2 2010

  26. 4.How to investigatecomplaints • Visit the care provider? • Studydocuments? epso complaints 5 2 2010

  27. 5. Anonymouscomplaints • Anonymouscomplaints to be handled? epso complaints 5 2 2010

  28. 6. How to follow-up complaints • Whichway of follow-up is preferred? epso complaints 5 2 2010

  29. 7. Written reports • Not sent to complainant (Flanders)? • Not sent to care provider (Slovenia)? epso complaints 5 2 2010

  30. 8. General reports • No general reports in Sweden, Finland, Slovenia, Flanders? epso complaints 5 2 2010

  31. 9. Training inspectors * Specificcomplaints training in NorthernIreland, Norway, Flanders (…)Lithuania * Set up training together? epso complaints 5 2 2010

More Related