1 / 21

The Influence of Integrating Kinesthetic Learning Experiences in Elementary Classrooms

The Influence of Integrating Kinesthetic Learning Experiences in Elementary Classrooms. Heather E. Erwin, Aaron Beighle, Mark Abel, & Angela Miller University of Kentucky College of Education. Purpose of the Study.

frayne
Download Presentation

The Influence of Integrating Kinesthetic Learning Experiences in Elementary Classrooms

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Influence of Integrating Kinesthetic Learning Experiences in Elementary Classrooms Heather E. Erwin, Aaron Beighle, Mark Abel, & Angela Miller University of Kentucky College of Education

  2. Purpose of the Study • Examine the impact of a classroom-based physical activity (CBPA) intervention on elementary students’ physical activity levels during mathematics lessons and the entire school day • Investigate the extent to which students retained academic content taught during CBPA

  3. Introduction • Many American youth are not meeting the recommendations of 60+ minutes of MVPA per day (Vincent et al., 2003) • By age 8, overweight children are 80% more at risk of being overweight or obese as adults (NASPE & American Heart Association, 2006) • Important to provide multiple physical activity opportunities to individuals at a young age

  4. Introduction • School-based interventions advocated (Pate et al., 2006; Sallis & McKenzie, 1991) • Child Nutrition and WIC Reauthorization Act of 2004(Public Law 108-265, 2004) • National trend towards reducing PA opportunities in schools due to legislative pressure requiring schools to hold students to high academic standards (House of Representatives 1804, 103rd Congress, 1994)

  5. Literature Review • Mixed results found with literature on physical activity and academic performance • Physical activity has been linked to increased educational achievement (Coe et al., 2006; Field, Diego, & Sanders, 2001; Sallis et al., 1999) • No significant academic differences between youth receiving varying levels of physical activity (Daley & Ryan, 2000; Fisher, Juszczak, & Friedman, 1996; Sanders et al., 2000)

  6. Literature Review • Despite inconsistencies, positive relationships exist between physical activity and specific facilitators of learning • Physical activity(Oliver, Schofield, & McEvoy, 2006; Stewart et al., 2004) • On-task behavior (Mahar et al., 2006) • Attentiveness (Azrin, Elhe, & Beaumont, 2006; Pellegrini, Huberty, & Jones, 1995) • Concentration (Caterino & Polak, 1999)

  7. Literature Review • Limited research on physical activity and retention of information • Disability research suggests an exercise program affected working memory of children with dyslexia (Reynolds & Nicolson, 2007) • Positive association between healthy children’s fitness and their working memory (Hillman, Castelli, & Buck, 2005)

  8. Participants • 76 children (43 boys, 33 girls), aged 8 to 12 (M = 10.08, SD = .86) • 4 teachers (all females) • Recruited from one elementary school in Fayette County, KY

  9. Instruments • Physical activity • Walk4Life MLS-2505 pedometers (Plainfield, IL) • Model GT1M Actigraph LLC. Accelerometers (Pensacola, FL) • Student knowledge • Teacher-developed learning checks

  10. Procedures • Teacher in-service to develop integration activities and learning checks • Example: Write each fraction as a decimal and a percent. 78 10 25 • Example: 149 ÷ 7

  11. Procedures • Physical activity • 5 days baseline • 13 days intervention • Learning checks • Pre-, post-, and 9 weeks post-

  12. Data Analysis • Physical activity • Step counts/outputs averaged during baseline and intervention • Multiple paired-sample t-tests

  13. Data Analysis • Learning checks • Scores averaged during baseline, post-intervention, and 9 weeks post-intervention • Multiple paired-sample t-tests

  14. Pedometer Results

  15. Accelerometer Results

  16. Learning Check Results

  17. Discussion • Participants accumulated significantly more steps during math lessons and overall school day in CBPA. • Accelerometer data suggest, that in a limited subsample of participants, there was a modest, yet significant increase in physical activity intensity during the intervention math classes.

  18. Discussion • Students learned math content via CBPA. • Students retained math content presented via CBPA nine weeks later. • CBPA may occur without jeopardizing student learning (Ahamed et al, 2007). • Results may provide additional support for integrating physical activity into academic lessons.

  19. Implications • With low physical activity among children, CBPA may help individuals reach recommended levels. • Due to the importance of test scores in schools, results of this study may encourage teachers to use CBPA to teach core content, or at the very least, prevent them from opposing its implementation.

  20. Limitations • Small sample size from one school, two grade levels • Limited to integration of physical activity with one subject area • Short intervention • Cross-sectional data • Learning check threats to validity

  21. Future Studies • More participants, grade levels, subject areas • Control group comparison • Teacher perceptions in relation to student physical activity

More Related