1 / 37

CAS LX 502 Semantics

CAS LX 502 Semantics. 4a. Events and Theta roles 3.5, 4.4 (8.1, 8.2). Situations. We can think of sentences as referring to situations ( events , states , eventualities ). A sentence like Pat opened the door can be thought of as meaning

franklin
Download Presentation

CAS LX 502 Semantics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CAS LX 502Semantics 4a. Events and Theta roles 3.5, 4.4 (8.1, 8.2)

  2. Situations • We can think of sentences as referring to situations (events, states, eventualities). • A sentence like Pat opened the door can be thought of as meaning • ‘There is an event, it is an opening, it affects the door, and it is instigated by Pat.’ • In understanding the details of our interpretive system, reference to events/situations can prove useful.

  3. Tense • Events take place in time, and language uses tense to situate events in time. • Pat sang the national anthem. • (The singing event was in the past—before now) • Pat will sing the national anthem. • (The singing event is in the future—after now) • Pat is singing the national anthem. • (The singing event is now) Now

  4. Situation types • States: static and unchanging • Individual-level: • Pat is tall. • Pat knows French. • Stage-level: • Pat is hungry. • Pat is bored. • Events: dynamic, involving motion/change • Pat is pushing the cart into the corner.

  5. Tense vs. aspect • Tense locates a situation in time, aspect describes the internal temporal structure of the situation. • Completed (perfect) • Pat had eaten a sandwich. • Pat has eaten a sandwich. • Pat will have eaten a sandwich. • Ongoing (progressive) • Pat was eating a sandwich. • Pat is eating a sandwich. • Pat will be eating a sandwich.

  6. Classifying situations • States (want, love, hate, know, believe) • Activities (run, walk, swim, push a cart) • Accomplishments (run a mile, walk to the store, paint a picture, draw a circle) • Achievements(recognize, find, stop, reach the top) • Semelfactives(cough, knock) (don’t change state)

  7. Classifying situations • The different situation types essentially define the different kinds of “shadow” the situation casts on the timeline. • Point: Part of our semantic knowledge includes knowledge about situations/events. • We will return to a more detailed discussion of tense and aspect and event structure later in the course.

  8. Roles in an event • Pat pushed the cart into the corner with a stick. • This sentence describes an event, tying together several participants: • The event is a pushing event • Patis the instigator of the event • The cartis affected (moved) during the event • The cornermarks the endpoint of the path • A stickis the instrument used to effect the movement

  9. Thematic roles • Agent: initiator, capable of acting with volition • Patient: entity undergoing change • Theme: entity moved or located • Experiencer: Aware of event, but not in control • Beneficiary: Entity for whose benefit the event occurs • Instrument: Means by which event comes about • Location: Place in which event occurs • Goal: Entity/place toward which something moves • Source: Entity/place from which something moves

  10. thematic roles (q-grids) • Among the pieces of information stored in our mental lexicon about predicates is the q-grid of a predicate. • The predicate names a kind of event, and specifies what entities play a role in the event. • put V: <Agent, Theme, Location> • Pat put the book on the table.

  11. q-grids • put V: <Agent, Theme, Location> • Pat put the book on the table. • Conventionally, only required q-roles are listed in the q-roles. That is, q-roles that are necessary in specifying the event. • *Pat put on the table. • *Pat put the book. • Pat put the book on the table with a spatula.

  12. Arguments and adjuncts • An argumentis required by the q-grid. • An adjunctis superfluous, less connected to the event, freer in ordering. Can be added to further specify any kind of compatible event. • *Pat put the fork. • Pat put the fork on the table. • Pat put the fork on the table with gusto at 6pm. • Pat put the fork on the table at 6pm with gusto. • With gusto, Pat put the fork on the table at 6pm. • *Pat put the fork at 6pm with gusto on the table. • *On the table, Pat put the fork at 6pm with gusto.

  13. Classes of verbs • We can classify verbs by the number of q-roles in their q-grids. • Intransitive: trip<Theme> • Transitive: kick<Agent, Patient> • Ditransitive: put<Agent, Theme, Location> • Atransitive: rain< > • Sort of. • The baby kicked, Pat tripped Tracy, Chris read (the book). It’s more complicated than it seems.

  14. Classes of verbs • Even apart from valency (number of arguments in the q-grid), we can identify lots of classes of verbs that behave alike in terms of q-roles. • give, lend, supply, pay, donate, contributeV: <Agent, Theme, Recipient> • receive, accept, borrow, buy, purchase, rent, hireV:<Recipient, Theme, Source> • break, open, sink, collapseV: <Patient>V: <Agent, Patient> • eat, drink, read, paintV: <Agent>V: <Agent, Patient>

  15. What are the q-roles? • How do we know that the list of q-roles we have is right? • We don’t. • We can group q-roles in various ways, or subdivide them. The question is what provides the greatest insight to linguistic structure. • The rock frightens Pat. • Pat frightens the rock. • The car ran over the nail in the road. • Theme = Patient? Recipient = Goal = Beneficiary? Does it matter? • Actor vs. Agent? • Malicious Agent vs. Benevolent Agent?

  16. Can an argument get more than one thematic role/q-role? • Pat threw the ball to Tracy. • Yes. • (e.g., Jackendoff) Pat: Agent, Source; the ball: Patient, Theme; Tracy: Goal. • No. • (e.g., Chomsky) q-roles can contain more than one q-relation, but it is linguistically one role (bundle of q-relations). Pat[Agent, Source]. • Depends on what generalization is most useful in predicting things. Seems likely that the second one is better by that measure.

  17. Subjects and objects • We can identify parts of sentences as subjects, predicates, objects. • Often these are defined by position and by case. • I met her. She met me. • Grammatical roles and q-roles are dissociable. • Pat closed the door. • The door closed.

  18. Linking • Almost any q-role can be a structural subject. • Chris planned the heist. • Tracy saw the crime occur. • The window broke. • The hammer smashed the glass. • Chris tripped. • Chris got a summons.

  19. Linking • There are tendencies at least. • If there’s an Agent, it is the subject. • The exam failed Pat. • Otherwise, if there’s an instrument, it is the subject. • The hammer broke the vase. • Otherwise, if there’s a Theme or Patient, it is the subject. • The vase broke. • *The vase broke with the hammer.

  20. Linking hierarchies • Determining which q-role is the subject?Agent/Experiencer > Instrument > Theme/Patient • Pat broke the vase on Tuesday with a hammer. • The hammer broke the vase on Tuesday. • The vase broke on Tuesday (*with a hammer) • The dog ate my homework. • My homework was eaten (by the dog). • Tracy was given my homework. • *A fork was eaten my homework.

  21. Why q-roles? • We are trying to describe generalizations about language, meaning, the mapping to structure. • We can imagine a lot of different kinds of roles. E.g., Patient could undergo a lot of different degrees of affectedness • Touch (no change) • Squeeze (temporary change) • Break (fundamental change)

  22. (

  23. Dowty on q-roles • Fine-grain: q-roles are really collections of entailments. E.g., “does a volitional act”, “with intent”, “moves or changes externally.” Many verbs share this entailment with their most prominent argument (“Agent”). • Course-grain: There are only these collections of q-roles, of two kinds (Proto-Agent, Proto-Patient). Which collection plays the more prominent role depends on the constitution of the collection (relatively).

  24. Proto-Agent, Proto-Patient • Proto-Agent • Volitional involvement • Sentience/perception • Causing event or change of state in another participant • Movement relative to another participant • Proto-Patient • Undergoes change of state • Incremental theme • Causally affected by another participant • Stationary relative to another participant • Agent is a prototypical Proto-Agent. Experiencer, less so, Instrument less so. Patient is a prototypical Proto-Patient, Beneficiary less so.

  25. )

  26. Why q-roles? • We get some generalization power by considering q-roles, allowing us to define classes of verbs that share similar behavior. • As an example, psychological verbs (admire, enjoy, amuse, frighten), which have an Experiencer and a Stimulus (or Percept). • Two types, differing in the linking of arguments to syntactic positions. • Point here: we need to refer to q-roles to differentiate the two types.

  27. Psych verbs • Type 1 (Subject-experiencer) • admire, enjoy, fear, like, love, relish, savor • V: <Experiencer, Stimulus> • Type 2 (Object-experiencer) • amuse, entertain, frighten, interest, please, surprise, thrill • V: <Stimulus, Experiencer>

  28. q-roles and language description • Saeed (in another Semantics textbook) gives the example of Lakhota, which morphologically marks Patient and Agent (hence we need the concepts to adequately describe the language). • Agent subjects or objects wa- • Patient subjects or objects ma-

  29. Active vs. Passive (Voice) • Pat ate the sandwich • The sandwich was eaten (by Pat) • Passive “demotes” the Agent/Experiencer, promoting the next q-role to subject. • eatV: <Agent, Patient> (active)eatenV: <Patient> (passive) • The book was given to Pat.(theme) • Pat was given a book. (recipient) • The shot was heard ’round the world.(percept) • The kids were frightened.(experiencer) • The ghost was feared.(stimulus)

  30. Passive • Generally, only the highest argument can be promoted to subject position in the passive. • He sprayed paint on the wall. He sprayed the wall with paint. • Paint was sprayed on the wall. The wall was sprayed with paint. • *The wall was sprayed paint on. *Paint was sprayed the wall with. • He loaded hay onto the truck. He loaded the truck with hay. • Hay was loaded onto the truck. The truck was loaded with hay. • *The truck was loaded hay onto. *Hay was loaded the truck with. • He gave a book to Mary. He gave Mary a book. • A book was given to Mary. Mary was given a book. • *Mary was given a book to. *A book was given Mary.

  31. Passive usage • Passives are often useful to “background” the subject (either to total omission or at least to a less prominent role). • Pat took a trip to Providence yesterday. • The police arrested him. • He was arrested by the police. • He sprayed the car with paint. • #The car was sprayed with paint.

  32. Middles • Middles are sort of like passives: the Agent/Experiencer is suppressed and the next q-role is promoted to subject. The verb does not take on a passive form (in English), and the construction is generally only available to describe a degree of “success”: • Pat broke the calculator. • The calculator was broken. • This calculator breaks easily.

  33. Adverbs • How might we describe the meaning of an adverb? Say, loudly. • The hooligan shouted loudly. • Well, it seems a bit like this: • There was a shouting event. • The hooligan was the Agent of that event. • It was a loud event. • Adverbs seem to modify events

  34. Adverb(-like thing)s as event modifiers • The hooligan shouted loudly on Saturday atop the bench by the tree in the rain. • This asserts the existence of an event that: • Is a shouting • Has the hooligan as Agent • Is loud • Is on Saturday • Is atop the bench • Is by the tree • Is in the rain • Great for manner and temporal adverbs.

  35. Subject-oriented adverbs • Zinédine intentionally hit Marco. • Marco was intentionally hit by Zinédine. • It’s not the whole event that is intentional, it is somehow related to one of the participants. The subject? Well, yes. The Agent? Maybe. • That second one seems a bit ambiguous

  36. Speaker-oriented adverbs • Annoyingly, Pat was late. • Predictably, Pat (stupidly) answered the questions (brilliantly)

  37.         

More Related