1 / 23

Telecom for improving investment climate & ICT use

Telecom for improving investment climate & ICT use . Rohan Samarajiva, Public Interest Program Unit, Ministry of Economic Reform, Science & Technology Samarajiva@lirne.net ; +94 1 247 8733. Purpose of presentation. Reform of telecom is a necessary condition for investment overall

francis
Download Presentation

Telecom for improving investment climate & ICT use

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Telecom for improving investment climate & ICT use Rohan Samarajiva, Public Interest Program Unit, Ministry of Economic Reform, Science & Technology Samarajiva@lirne.net; +94 1 247 8733

  2. Purpose of presentation • Reform of telecom is a necessary condition for investment overall • Creating conditions for private investment in telecom • Market entry • Independent & effective regulation • Examples from Sri Lanka throughout

  3. Sri Lanka’s telecom sector after 12 years of reforms • Multiple operators (70+) • 3 national fixed (no waiters in urban areas) • 4 national mobile (overtook fixed; real price declined) • 5+ facilities-based data • 30 external gateway (~66% decrease in price) • 20+ non-facilities based data • Fixed teledensity < 1 in 1991  almost 5 in 2003; Mobile ~0.01 in 1991  5 < in 2003 • Telecom & banking are fastest growing sectors in economy in 2003 (~16%) • Telecom no longer a barrier to investment

  4. Telecom as a necessary condition for increased investment • Two solutions • Improve service only in enclave • Improve sector performance everywhere • Sri Lanka tried the enclave solution in 1980s • Supplementing exchange & outside plant in Katunayake EPZ • Giving priority to GCEC factories (investors) • Poor results including ridiculous outcome of banning automatic rediallers

  5. Investment in telecom sector overall is key . . . • What we want is • Adequate supply of services • Lower prices • Higher quality • More choice • How do we get it? • Not another reform of the failed government monopoly • Not regulation, per se • More investment

  6. Private investment to improve telecom • Telecom is the infrastructure with the most dynamic industry structures and technologies • Integrated government monopolies lack nimbleness to play • No multilateral/bilateral assistance for unreformed monopolies • Public investments better used elsewhere

  7. Government action to attract private investment in telecom • Greater private investment depends on positive answers to 2 questions • Are the returns adequate? (market risk) • Are safeguards against administrative expropriation adequate? (regulatory risk) • What can government do? • Let investors look after market risk: no market-position guarantees • Reduce regulatory risk

  8. Government actions: Market entry & privatization • Minimize barriers to entry; SL policy is • License only where scarce resources are involved • Otherwise authorizations • Examples • External gateway operator licenses • 30 given since March 2003 • No discretion; no numerical limits

  9. Entry conditions compared

  10. Results . . . • From unstable monopoly to open entry . . . • From SLR 75 a minute to 20-25 . . . • Telecom no longer seen as barrier to BPO investments

  11. Fixed telephony investments in Sri Lanka, 1992-2002 Incumbent Partially Privatized; Foreign Management; Competition Incumbent Government Owned; No Competition

  12. Implications for the exchequer • Before the reforms, telecom was an easy but small source of government revenue • Very low rates for domestic (<40% revenues); high rates on international outgoing and termination (60<% revenues) • Periodic levies • After the reforms, it is an easy, reliable and LARGER source of government revenue • ~20% tax (VAT; BTT earlier); reliable • On a user base that has increased seven fold • Equity sales; licensing; spectrum fees; contributions to Vishva Grama Fund (for rural rollout) • Dividends from shareholding

  13. Key reform events • 1989-1994 • Licensing of 15+ facilities-based operators, including Incumbent which was changed to corporation • 1996 • Licensing of two fixed competitors (USD 120 m) • 1997 • 35% sale of Incumbent to NTT of Japan for USD 225 million with 5-year management agreement

  14. Key reform events • 1998 • Active regulation starts • First step of 5 year rate rebalancing • Satellite gateways liberalized • 1999 • Incumbent found to be in violation of license condition and pays consumers US$ 1 million • First public hearing conducted

  15. Key reform events • 2002 • Government sells 12.5% of Incumbent’s equity, bringing government ownership to <50% • 2003 • 30+ External Gateway Licenses issued • New Interconnection Rules gazetted • Implementation ongoing • Already a commitment of USD 90 million additional investment

  16. Government actions: Regulation • Reduce regulatory risk • Poor countries are poor because • Government does not work well  regulatory risk is high  investments are low/skewed  infrastructure is inadequate  economy is hobbled • Solution: independent and effective regulatory agency

  17. Characteristics of effective regulation • No interference by government/incumbent • Constrained discretion • Professional and competent staff • Transparent participatory processes • Expeditious decision making • Efforts to reduce adversarial modes; increase buy-in • Doing a few things well

  18. Independence of regulatory agency • Information & Communication Commission that will replace TRC • Members appointed with concurrence of Constitutional Council • Accountable to/removable by Parliament • Not reporting to Minister for Telecom

  19. Constrained discretion • Rate rebalancing in 1998-2003 governed by legal agreement that set revenue requirements • Regulator decided specific tariffs that would yield promised revenues

  20. Telecom regulation should focus on • Interconnection & anti-competitive issues • In Sri Lanka • New interconnection rules in March 2003 • Including access to undersea cable station • Implementation in process • Dominant position rules being framed • New legislation will remove tariff regulation from non-dominant operators • Anti-competitive practices proceedings soon

  21. Regulation should focus on • Efficient management of scarce resources (spectrum, rights of way and numbers) • In Sri Lanka • Allocation & assignments made public • 1800 MHz, CDMA & WiFi consultations • First frequency auction in May 2003 • New legislation on rights of way including “final offer” arbitration • New numbering plan being implemented

  22. . . . And get out of unnecessary areas • Most retail tariffs unregulated in new Act (except of dominant operators) • Equipment approvals power replaced by Mutual Recognition approach • Consumer issues to be covered by consumer contracts • Regulator intervenes only when contract provisions exhausted

  23. SAARC countries 1995-2001 telecom performance

More Related