1 / 22

Archived File

Archived File. The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated. See the OER Public Archive Home Page for more details about archived files.

francesca-murphy
Download Presentation

Archived File

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated. See the OER Public Archive Home Page for more details about archived files.

  2. Multiple Principal Investigators on Individual Research Awards NIH Implementation Plans and Status Report

  3. Rationale • Traditional single-PI model does not always work well for multidisciplinary efforts and collaboration • Growing consensus that team science would be encouraged if more than one PI could be recognized on individual awards • Overarching goal: maximize the potential of team science efforts, responsive to the challenges and opportunities of the 21st century.

  4. Background • Recommendations from 2003 NIH Bioengineering Consortium (BECON) Symposium, “Catalyzing Team Science” • NIH Roadmap 2005 initiative to stimulate interdisciplinary science http://nihroadmap.nih.gov/interdisciplinary/ • Directive from Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP); 2005. • Request for Information (RFI) issued by the NIH to solicit input on policies and issues of special interest to the health-related research community; 2005.

  5. Principal Investigator: Definition • “The individual(s) judged by the applicant organization to have the appropriate level of authority and responsibility to direct the project or program supported by the grant. The applicant organization may designate multiple individuals as PIs who share the authority and responsibility for leading and directing the project, intellectually and logistically. Each PI is responsible and accountable to the applicant organization, or, as appropriate, to a collaborating organization, for the proper conduct of the project or program including the submission of all required reports.” • The presence of more than one identified PI on an application or award diminishes neither the responsibility nor the accountability of any individual PI.

  6. NIH Implementation: • Although OSTP issued a directive that all Federal agencies should allow multiple PIs on a single award, agencies may develop implementation policies that are specific to their agency. • Therefore, many of the following slides describe implementation requirements that are specific to NIH. For example, the Contact PI and the Leadership Plan are specific to the NIH

  7. Contact PI • The multiple-PI option requires the designation of a single “Contact PI”. • Contact PI is the liaison to NIH, and is responsible for: • all communication between the PIs and the NIH; • coordinating progress reports for the project. • Contact PI must meet all eligibility requirements for PI status in the same way as other PIs, but has no other special roles or responsibilities within the project team beyond those mentioned above. • The role of Contact PI may be rotated among the multiple PIs on an annual basis.

  8. Eligible Projects/Grant Mechanisms • Projects or activities that clearly require a “team science” approach and which do not fit the single-PI model. Selection of single or multiple-PI option should always be based on the research proposed. • Not synonymous with “big science.” Could include as few as two PIs jointly responsible for the scientific and technical direction of the project. • No upper limit on number of PIs allowed. • Initially limited to pilot initiatives. Phased-in expansion expected to include full range of NIH mechanisms. • Will supplement, and not replace, the traditional single PI model.

  9. Eligible Projects/Grant Mechanisms • Investigators interested in the multi-PI model are encouraged to contact and discuss the proposed project with an NIH Institute or Center program staff member to determine whether a multiple PI approach to the project is better than the traditional single PI approach.

  10. Application Format/Content • Pilots: RFAs and PAs will include special application preparation instructions. • PHS398 has been modified to permit the entry of information for more than one PI. • SF424 electronic grant application form http://grants2.nih.gov/grants/funding/424/ can already accommodate more than one PI. • NIH will publish instructions for various mechanisms as multiple-PI option becomes available for a range of investigator-initiated grant mechanisms.

  11. Leadership Plan • Leadership Plan will follow the Research Plan as a new section • Presents the PIs’ and Applicant Organization’s proposed framework to facilitate and enhance scientific productivity and to protect the project in the case of disagreements. • Describes governance and organizational structure of the research project, including: • communication plans, including reporting to the NIH funding component; • process for making decisions on scientific direction, • allocation of resources; • publications; • intellectual property issues; • procedures for resolving conflicts; • PIs’ roles and administrative, technical, and scientific responsibilities for the project, including responsibilities for human subjects or animal studies as appropriate.

  12. Budgets for Multiple PI Awards • Budget allocations to individual PIs will be permitted but not required. • In pilot phase, budget allocations will be informal -- • based on decision by the PIs and the institution at the time of award; • allocation request will be recorded on the NIH Notice of Grant Award in a footnote; • grantee institution can choose to set up internal accounts to implement the requested allocation; • accounting within the institution not to be reported back to the NIH. • In the near future, the NIH will explore other options for allocation that could include formal allocation and tracking of separate accounts within an award or the use of linked awards. The NIH will seek feedback and advice from the research community about such options for allocating budgets.

  13. Awards to Multiple Institutions • When multiple institutions are involved, PIs and their institutions may either: • use traditional subcontract mode, designating one institution as the prime institution and requesting funding for the other institution(s) via subcontract(s); or • submit separate but linked or tethered applications with a request for separate grant numbers (i.e., “linked awards”). • The process for requesting linked awards and policies for managing linked awards are still being developed. Experience gained from the first phase of multiple institution applications, may be used to modify processes.

  14. Peer Review • The standard five review criteria will be applied to multiple-PI applications, with the following additional text applied to the “Approach” criterion: • “For applications designating multiple PIs, does the Leadership Plan ensure that there will be sufficient coordination and communication among the PIs? Are the administrative plans for the management of the research project appropriate, including plans for resolving conflicts?”

  15. Peer Review (cont’d) • As in review of traditional single-PI applications, peer reviewers will consider whether the designated PIs have appropriate training and experience to carry out the proposed study. • Inclusion of a “weak” or inappropriate PI will reflect negatively on both the “Approach” and “Investigators” review criteria • All PIs on a multiple-PI application are responsible for the intellectual development and direction of scientific and technical activities supported by the grant as a whole. Therefore, the PI’s role is more critical than that of “co-investigator” or other collaborator.

  16. Post Award • Investigators will have maximum flexibility to respond to new scientific opportunities within the overall scope of the funded project. Tracking and paperwork will be kept to a minimum. • Re-allocation of funds and revisions to the Leadership Plan during the project period: • via a joint decision of the PIs; • implemented at the institutional level; • no need for approval by NIH, beyond the normal requirements for any grant. • NIH plans to simply track most revisions through the noncompeting continuation (Type 5) application, as it currently does for any changes to the scientific direction that are within the scope of the funded project. • Policies involving linked awards are still being developed.

  17. Communications/Reporting • All named PIs on multiple-PI applications must establish accounts in eRA Commons prior to the submission of the application. • All PIs will be able to view summary statements and status reports in NIH eRA Commons system https://commons.era.nih.gov/commons/. • NIH requests for information will be conveyed to the multiple PIs through the Contact PI. • All PIs on funded multiple-PI grants will eventually be credited through the NIH’s “Computer Retrieval of Information on Scientific Projects” (CRISP) http://crisp.cit.nih.gov/

  18. Web site • http://grants2.nih.gov/grants/multi_pi/index.htm

  19. Timeline • Multiple-PI option will be available for applications submitted in response to selected RFAs or PAs with May or June 2006 receipt dates. • Additional pilots will be conducted in the fall of 2006; some of these will test the processing of multiple-PI applications submitted electronically through Grants.gov. http://grants.gov/ • All pilots involving RFAs and PAs will be announced through Notices in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts http://grants1.nih.gov/grants/guide/index.html.

  20. Timeline (cont’d) • It is likely that the multiple-PI option will become available for most investigator-initiated research grant mechanisms submitted for January 2007 and later application receipt dates. • This second phase of system development will generally follow the implementation schedule for the SF424 electronic grant application form, which can accommodate the multiple-PI option. • The second phase of development will include consideration of: • Linked awards • Apportionment of funds to individual PIs • Recognition of all key personnel • As part of the implementation process, continued advice will be solicited from the extramural community.

  21. Develop language for pilot RFAs & PAs Submit 398 to OMB for Clearance Issue pilot RFAs & PAs Receive last of the Multi-PI pilot applications Invest-Init. Multi PI RPG Applications Receive first Multi-PI pilot applications Scope eRA/Grants.gov tethered Apps/Linked External groups on tethered Apps/Linked 2005 JUN MAR FEB MAY JUN APR NOV OCT AUG APR MAY JUL MAR DEC JAN FEB SEP JAN R01 Ks,G11 R03,R21 2006 2007 Meet with NSF on Tethered Apps/Linked Develop Requirements for Tethered Apps/Linked Identify Business Options for Tethered Apps/Linked Electronic Receipt Multi-PI Pilots Evaluate pilots – use of Multi-PI/Linked Awards Issue Regulations at 42CFR52 for Comment Build System for Linked, Invest-Init Complete eRA build for tethered Apps/Linked October Permit tethered Multi-PI applications/linked, Invest-Init.? Fs T32 Ps DEC NOV SEP AUG NOV DEC OCT MAY MAR APR FEB OCT JAN SEP JUN JUL AUG JUL 2008 Tentative Multi-PI Timeline Multi-PI Timeline as of March 14, 2006

  22. Questions? http://grants2.nih.gov/grants/multi_pi/index.htm

More Related