1 / 22

REACH, a lever for a sustainable chemical industry: conditions and modalities

REACH, a lever for a sustainable chemical industry: conditions and modalities Conference of 11 and 12 March 2005 Brussels. The CES study: content and rationale. The study seeks to … Extend existing thinking On issues concerning the impact and implementation of REACH

forest
Download Presentation

REACH, a lever for a sustainable chemical industry: conditions and modalities

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. REACH, a lever for a sustainable chemical industry: conditions and modalities Conference of 11 and 12 March 2005 Brussels

  2. The CES study: content and rationale • The study seeks to … • Extend existing thinking • On issues concerning the impact and implementation of REACH • On the identification of areas subject to further investigation • Shift the perception • Propose new insight on the REACH project in the light of current debates • And open up perspectives • … thanks to a content centred around three questions • REACH’s compatibility with sustainable development • The dynamic of innovation • Dealing with the challenges of competition, particularly for SMEs

  3. REACH as a lever for a sustainable chemical industry c

  4. 1/3. A project in tune with sustainable development (SD) … • The characteristics of SD • Integration of various dimensions (economic, environmental and social ), … • … of the various stakeholders • … and managing tensions • From this point of view, REACH offers a number of guarantees • A dedicated agency: independence, expertise, transparency • The determination to preserve the balance inherent in SD, through a wide-ranging and prolonged consultation

  5. … and with the development of CSR • CSR (corporate social responsibility) • The contribution of businesses to sustainable development • From this point of view, it is logical that the burden of proof should be upon the businesses • REACH represents an opportunity for a visible implementation of the “Responsible Care Agreement” adopted by the chemical industry

  6. 2/3. The dynamic of REACH and the new competitive framework • REACH : an already rich dynamic … • Long-term process of dialogue among the stakeholders • Significant adaptations that take into account a number of challenges (innovation, SMEs) • … that is being deployed in a societal context that is becoming increasingly sensitive to health and safety issues … • An increase in strategic risks • Accidents (AZF,…), multiplication of “scandals”: food pharmaceuticals, … • The development of multiple factor diseases • Uncertainties as to the long-term impact of chemical products on health

  7. 2/3. The dynamic of REACH and the new competitive framework • … marked by the inexorable increase in the pressures applied to the European chemical industry … • Downstream (consumers, retail distribution, producers of consumer products with high market value) • The countries with high environmental standards • The non-European competitors who sooner or later will also be applying the new standard • The emergence of a new competitive framework … • A chemical industry placed “in the dock” by consumers and citizens (cf. the very recent challenge to cosmetics in France)

  8. 2/3. The dynamic of REACH and the new competitive framework • Emergence of new behaviour patterns among the players • After an initial phase of frontal opposition … • … the players are beginning to position themselves in relation the their special interests … • … in the face of a social (and therefore commercial) demand that is going through a major upheaval • In such a context, REACH can make it possible to gain a competitive advantage • By an effort of transparency that is appreciated by the market • By giving new impetus to quality innovation having an HSE orientation

  9. 3/3. The key question: how is this to be implemented? • The uncertainties surrounding the effects of REACH … • Players’ strategies, the dynamics of competition, challenges from outside the EU, complementarity with other European policies, … • … forces us to look for the conditions of effectiveness of the regulatory approach which will be best suited to: • Create an overall dynamic of the chemical industry • Develop balances that are compatible with a policy of sustainable development • Hence the necessity to focus the debate on the rules and conditions of implementation

  10. REACH and innovation, a core issue c

  11. 1/3 R&D in the chemical industry, an essential but complex vector • An essential vector for success • The Lisbon strategy • Improving the environment and competitiveness at the same time • Finding substitutes for and improving existing products • A complex chemical context • Favourable factors • A sector historically rooted in innovation • Expertise in innovation under environmental constraints • Differentiated problem areas • By sector of activity • By geographical zone • By company size

  12. 2/3 An R&D that is not spontaneously in tune with REACH • Points requiring attention • A weakening of Europe’s relative performance • A tendency to segment R&D • Trends in the R&D effort that are at odds with REACH’s goal • The “financial/marketing” driver: concentration on the most profitable product lines; an orientation that is more downstream than upstream. Existence of investment cycles that need to be harmonised with the REACH timeline

  13. 3/3 The challenge: creating a dynamic of innovation in HSE • Through REACH … • Favourable provisions … • 5-year substance exemption in R&D • Application to existing substances • Withdrawal of hazardous substances = an incentive for innovation • Raising the exemption threshold (from 10 kg to 1 T) • A long lead-time and significant breakthroughs that are an incentive for innovation • … and special attention given to the diversity of situations • Through the R&D policies of the EU

  14. The vital issue of the uncertainties of the economic effects of REACH c

  15. 1/3. Differences … • Small causes, big effects? • Low overall direct costs, from 0.05% to 0.2% per year over 10 years • Yet certain macro-economic effects that could be potentially devastating • Discriminating parameters on global costs • The number of products stopped (for HSE or economic reasons) • The real scope of cascading effects on the business lines, in particular for employment • Two underlying models • Two concepts of competitiveness • Two concepts of implementation

  16. 2/3 … that reflect a confrontation between models … Top-down 2 to 3% of products recalled Very limited indirect costs «  pro-REACH » Competitiveness Differentiation Transparency: high social value HSE innovation Appreciated by the market Competitiveness Costs The additional costs of de REACH are going to penalise the industry Bottom-up 30% of products recalled Cascade effects « anti-REACH »

  17. 3/3. … with particularly critical issues for SMEs • Significant potential impact • Cost of recording data: • Double disadvantage: many substances, in small quantities • Larger number of tests and greater difficulty to absorb the costs, because of low volumes • Indirect impact because of input disparities for the users of chemical substances • A problem of implementation, more than of regulation • REACH includes provisions for adapting the regulation… • Reduced recording costs • Test mutualisation (consortia) • Authorisation provisions that include economic elements • … but they may be insufficient

  18. Conclusions : uncertainties and support provisions c

  19. 1/3 The stakes of the implementation process • Guarantee a fair balance between the economic, social and environmental components • Ensure there is a representation of the various stakeholders: • To be able to appraise situations of uncertainty • To articulate the public and private dimensions of R&D • Set up provisions and procedures providing support in the face of an uncertain dynamic

  20. 2/3 An implementation that has yet to be coordinated with politics • R&D: what place for REACH in the 7th PCR? • The 7th framework programme cadre chemical technology platform: the challenge to make a place for REACH • The major challenges (REACH is a revealer) • Decompartmentalize economic and social/societal innovations • SMEs: a transverse issue for European industrial policy • Participation of SMEs in the framework programme for research (15% of the budget) • Cooperation programmes among SMEs • But a compartmentalisation of policies leading to a splintering of actions

  21. 3/3 Two implementation issues that still need to be considered: regulating intra-sector disparities … • What level of adjustment? • Limited informal adjustment, left up to the initiative of the players : the current status of REACH • A comprehensive and centralised adjustment of the recording costs • economically possible (0.07% of turnover) • but could damage the principle of the burden of proof • An intermediate adjustment: • tax on chemical products, supplying a fund destined to facilitate the financing of of the recording studies of low volume/low value products (to be explored)

  22. … et building on the potential of the REACH effort • An pro-active SD policy: a label REACH? • Interest • Transform the recording and authorisation obligation … into an opportunity for differentiating and leveraging the products on the worldwide market • Impose the European reference system as a standard • Reinforce innovation policies and in fine competitiveness • Compatibility of the current provisions of the project • The agency as a certification body: expertise • Independence and neutrality of the certifying body • Transparency • Institutional and practical uncertainties remain to be lifted in order to guarantee the effectiveness of the certification / labelling process

More Related