html5-img
1 / 26

Etiquette

Etiquette . Press * 6 to mute; Press # 6 to unmute Keep your phone on mute unless you are dialoging with the presenter Never place phone on hold If you do not want to be called on please check the red mood button on the lower left of screen. Brain Death: The “Emerging” Debate

ford
Download Presentation

Etiquette

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Etiquette • Press * 6 to mute; • Press # 6 to unmute • Keep your phone on mute unless you are dialoging with the presenter • Never place phone on hold • If you do not want to be called on please check the red mood button on the lower left of screen

  2. Brain Death: The “Emerging” Debate Alan Sanders, Ph.D. Director, Center for Ethics Saint Joseph’s Health System, Atlanta, GA System Ethicist, Catholic Health East WWW.CHE.ORG/ETHICS

  3. Outline • History and Current Context • Case of Jacob • The meaning of ‘Death’ • Considerations

  4. History • 1950’s – Mechanical ventilation • “Barely alive” • Beyond coma • 1968 – “A Definition of Irreversible Coma” • 1981 – President’s Commission: • Two Standards for Death: • irreversible cessation of circulatory and respiratory functions • irreversible cessation of all functions of the entire brain, including the brainstem

  5. Current Context • Donation after Cardiac Death (DCD) • designed specifically for organ retrieval • considered by some to be overly aggressive • Donating organs and withdrawing life sustaining treatment • Brain dead patient kept “alive” until baby is brought to term • Always in the minds of the public: miracles and medical errors

  6. The Situation • You have just sat down with the parents of Jacob, a 17-year old boy who was in a terrible auto accident. You suspect that Jacob may be brain dead. You plan to tell them of this suspicion and the need to test for this possibility. • Understandably Jacob’s parents are in shock. • Also they are very inquisitive and generally skeptical of health care professionals.

  7. The facts • Severe head trauma • Patient unresponsive • No pupillary reflex • No reaction to painful stimuli • Need to test for presence of any neurological functioning – total brain failure

  8. What is Brain Death? • Irreversible end of all brain functions, including the brain stem • NOT the same as: • Coma • Usually some evidence of interaction with environment • Reflexes, painful stimuli • EEG • Persistent Vegetative State • Sustained autonomic function • Heart, lungs, sleeping and waking cycles

  9. Testing: Cardinal Findings • Unresponsiveness • Brainstem reflexes • Eye movement & reflexes • Facial responses to painful stimuli • Gag & cough reflex • Apnea testing

  10. Tests: Additional • Confirmatory Tests • Electrical activity • Electroencephalography (EEG) • Somatosensory and Brain Stem Auditory Evoked Potentials • Blood Flow • Cerebral Angiography • Computed Tomography (CT) • Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) • Transcranial Doppler Sonography

  11. Tests Confirm Brain Death • Jacob’s parents still filled with questions: • What is the chance of recovery? • How do you know for sure? • Is he really dead? • He’s breathing, warm • “I’ve heard that patients on a ventilator can still deliver a baby!”

  12. Physiological Functions • ‘Dead’ bodies can demonstrate • Wound healing • Hormone balancing and secretion • Elimination of cellular waste • Sophisticated medicine • Maintains many biochemical functions • Questioned the integrative role of the brain

  13. The concept of ‘Death’ • ‘Death’ cannot be based exclusively on clinical criteria • Where is the line? • Splitting hairs, whiskers, and beards • Concept of Person • A sum of the total of body parts/functions?

  14. Pope John Paul II, 2000 • In this regard, it is helpful to recall that the death of the person is a single event, consisting in the total disintegration of that unitary and integrated whole that is the personal self. It results from the separation of the life-principle (or soul) from the corporal reality of the person. The death of the person, understood in this primary sense, is an event which no scientific technique or empirical method can identify directly. • Address to 18th International Congress of the Transplantation Society

  15. Pope John Paul II, 2000 • Yet human experience shows that once death occurs certain biological signs inevitably follow, which medicine has learnt to recognize with increasing precision. In this sense, the "criteria" for ascertaining death used by medicine today should not be understood as the technical-scientific determination of the exact moment of a person's death, but as a scientifically secure means of identifying the biological signs that a person has indeed died. • Address to 18th International Congress of the Transplantation Society

  16. President’s Commission, 2008 • Why do we describe the central question of this inquiry as a philosophical question? We do so, in part, because this question cannot be settled by appealing to exclusively to clinical or pathophysiological facts. • After all, some biological activity in cells and tissues remains for a time even in a body that all would agree is a corpse. Such activity signifies that disparate parts of the once-living organism remain, but not the organism as a whole. • Controversies in the Determination of Death, Chapter Four, “The Philosophical Debate”

  17. President’s Commission, 2008 • Openness to the world, that is, receptivity to stimuli and signals from the surrounding environment. • The ability to act upon the world to obtain selectively what it needs. • The basic felt need that drives the organism to act as it must, to obtain what it needs and what its openness reveals to be available. • Controversies in the Determination of Death, Chapter Four, “The Philosophical Debate”

  18. Translation for Jacob • Jacob has died, even though certain biological systems still function • Jacob does not perceive anything in his environment • He cannot hear you, feel your touch • Jacob has no brain activity, no consciousness • He is not thinking, dreaming • Jacob breathing and heart beat or controlled completely by a machine • He is no longer capable of maintaining those functions on his own

  19. SomeRecommendations • Language, Language, Language • Consider your use of the term “brain death” • May imply more than one type of death • “Jacob (the person) has died.” • Avoid talking about “Life” sustaining treatment • Mechanical ventilation or artificial respiration • Avoid talking to patient as if he or she is still alive • Offer family your condolences & support • Prepare family and loved ones for removal of the body from mechanical ventilation

  20. Other Considerations • Review policies • Ensure strict adherence to AAN Guidelines • Check that staff are comfortable with protocols • “What is the patient codes during the apnea test?” • Prepare for possible conflicts • What is your institution prepared to do if the family vehemently disagrees?

  21. Discussion

  22. References • Guidelines for Diagnosing Brain Death • American Academy of Neurology, “Practice Parameters: Determining Brain Death in Adults.” Summary Statement, 1994, available online at http://www.aan.com/practice/guideline/uploads/118.pdf

  23. References • Church Teaching on Brain Death • Pope John Paull II “Address of the Holy Father John Paul II to the 18th International Congress of the Transplantation Society.” August 29th, 2000. Available online at http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/speeches/2000/jul-sep/documents/hf_jp-ii_spe_20000829_transplants_en.html

  24. References • President’s Commission on Brain Death • President’s Council on Bioethics, “Controversies in the Determination of Death: A White Paper by the President’s Council on Bioethics.” January, 2009. Available online at http://www.bioethics.gov/reports/death/index.html

More Related