1 / 18

AFTER SARS: A PUBLIC HEALTH ANALYSIS OF THE EPIDEMIC AND IMPLICATIONS FOR THE FUTURE

AFTER SARS: A PUBLIC HEALTH ANALYSIS OF THE EPIDEMIC AND IMPLICATIONS FOR THE FUTURE. Department of Community Medicine University of Hong Kong Department of Community & Family Medicine Chinese University of Hong Kong in collaboration with Imperial College, University of London

folk
Download Presentation

AFTER SARS: A PUBLIC HEALTH ANALYSIS OF THE EPIDEMIC AND IMPLICATIONS FOR THE FUTURE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. AFTER SARS: A PUBLIC HEALTH ANALYSIS OF THE EPIDEMIC AND IMPLICATIONS FOR THE FUTURE Department of Community Medicine University of Hong Kong Department of Community & Family Medicine Chinese University of Hong Kong in collaboration with Imperial College, University of London July 11, 2003

  2. A newspaper clipping titled “Row looms over transfer of Sars patients to Tai Po” published in SCMP on 28 April 2003.

  3. Suspected cases of SARS Hospitals HA eSARS Patient Interview Teams DH Master List SARSID

  4. Generic problems in health information systems • Variation in information capture • Lack of documentation and non-standardised protocols for information management procedures • Delays in transferring and merging information • Lack of real-time analysis and audit of collected data and of feedback to those responsible for its collection and management

  5. A new approach to information systems: setting targets Health information must be: • Valid (Measures what is needed) • Complete (Minimize missing values) • Accurate (Rigorous standards) • Reliable (Maintain quality, no drift) • Timely (No delays)

  6. The information cycle Events Application Information capture Intelligence Information systems

  7. Incubation Period for SARS in Hong Kong Early Late time from infection to onset (days)

  8. Onset-to-admission interval: a measure of effectiveness in public health and clinical care

  9. Rate of spread of an epidemic • RtEffective reproduction number • number of infections caused by each new case occurring at time, t

  10. 2.7 (19/2) 0.9 (26/3) 0.14 (10/4) Estimates of reproduction rate during the Hong Kong outbreak

  11. Preventive measures adopted (always or most of the time) in the past three days use serving utensils during meals adopt preventive measures when touching possible contaminated objects Wash hands after touching possible contaminated objects (%)

  12. Preventive measures adoptedin the past three days wear face mask adopt preventive measures at home adopt preventive measures at workplaces (%)

  13. Admission-to-death interval: a measure of susceptibility

  14. Case Fatality Rate: a warning system for virulence or treatment outcomes?

  15. Conclusions • Hong Kong has the best documented and analyzed public health data base on SARS • Hong Kong has the best estimates of epidemiological parameters to measure the effect and control of SARS • The Rt value shows that official interventions and self-imposed restrictions by the public lowered the reproduction rate very rapidly

  16. The way forward Hong Kong needs: • a new kind of information system for communicable disease control - as a permanent infrastructure • closer collaboration between academic and service providers on new developments in communicable disease control • a greater emphasis on health protection in resource allocation

  17. A newspaper clipping titled “WHO raises the spectre of a flu pandemic” published in SCMP on 20 May 2003.

  18. The Public Health Function (PHF) The PHF needs: • greater autonomy • more resources to underpin infrastructure • better science • improved opportunity to deal with the unexpected – like SARS

More Related