1 / 20

Specific effects and expectation of acupuncture treatment. A trial utilising PET imaging

Specific effects and expectation of acupuncture treatment. A trial utilising PET imaging. Dr P White Dr G Lewith Dr J Pariente Prof R Frackowiac. Background. Effectiveness vs Efficacy for acupuncture Often large treatment effects Neck pain trial

floria
Download Presentation

Specific effects and expectation of acupuncture treatment. A trial utilising PET imaging

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Specific effects and expectation of acupuncture treatment. A trial utilising PET imaging Dr P White Dr G Lewith Dr J Pariente Prof R Frackowiac

  2. Background • Effectiveness vs Efficacy for acupuncture • Often large treatment effects • Neck pain trial • White, Lewith, Prescott (2004), Annals of internal Medicine

  3. Neck pain - method • Acupuncture versus MTNS • Outcomes: - Pain (VAS) - Credibility (B & N) - QoL (general and disease specific) - A range of movement - Analgesic intake • Baseline, treatment, short (3) and long (12) term follow-up.

  4. Neck pain - results Mean pain scores from baseline to week 12 Acupuncture versus MTNS, 12% difference P = 0.01, 95% confidence intervals, 3-21% • The specific effect of acupuncture is statistically significantly different to placebo • This may be clinically significant but not in our study • The specific effect of acupuncture is about 4 times smaller than the non-specific effect

  5. Background • Need to tease apart specific and non-specific effects • Many different controls have been used • ? Physiological effect of acupuncture

  6. Functional Imaging and Acupuncture • Possible specific effects on healthy subjects - stimulation of GB37 (leg) & GB43 (foot) causes activation of visual & auditory cortex (Cho 2000) (fMRI) • Different areas become functional with ‘deqi’ vs needle stimulation in normal subjects (Hsieh 2001) (fMRI) • Placebo and Expectation (Dopamine release) may influence experience of pain (Wager 2004) (Fuente-Fernandez 2002)

  7. Functional Imaging and Acupuncture • Placebo analgesia shares mechanisms with opioid analgesia (Petrovic 2002) • PAG involved in higher cortical pain control (Tracey 2002) • Acupuncture induces PAG activity (Liu 2004) and modulates limbic system (Hui 2000)

  8. Questions • Does real acupuncture have a specific effect? • Is there a physiological/therapeutic response to the streitberger needle and how does this compare to that of real acupuncture? • Is the observed therapeutic effect of acupuncture and placebo due to the patient’s belief that there will be an effect?

  9. Method • Single blind • Crossover • Randomised to order of treatment - Real acupuncture - Streitberger - Overt placebo • Patients – OA first MCP joint, any age, no other major pain or illness.

  10. Streitberger Needle

  11. Outcomes Primary • Comparison of brain activation maps Secondary • Needle sensation (Jongbae Park 2002) • Credibility (Borkevec and Nau 1972) • HCAMQ (Hyland, Lewith, Westoby 2003) • Pain (100mm VAS)

  12. Flow chart of PET procedure Consent, history/ assessment/ questionnaires, insert cannula, MRI scan Randomisation Real Acupuncture Streitberger Placebo Overt Placebo Baseline PET scan Apply needle (0 minutes) Apply needle (0 minutes) Insert needle (0 mins) Manipulate (4 mins) Continues as per ‘Real acupuncture’ Continues as per ‘Real acupuncture’ Manipulate and scan (8 mins) Scan only (16 mins) Remove needle (23.5 mins) Scan only (24 mins) Scan only (32 mins)

  13. Results • 14 patients (F=11, M=3) • Right handed • 8= pain in left thumb • Mean age=59 (S.D.=5.7) (Range 48-63) • 4 patients had experience of acupuncture

  14. Credibility (2 p values) Real and Streitberger = similar credibility Real and Overt = significantly different Streitberger and Overt = ?different (less so)

  15. Skin penetration • 14 subjects for RA & SN, 1 subject for OP • Was the treatment real • No sig diff for RA & SN, both were sig diff to OP • Sensation • All 3 had similar sensations (although RA tended to elicit slightly stronger sensations followed by SN) • Other confounders • HCAMQ • Experience • Order • Pain No effect on outcome

  16. Real Acupuncture vs Streitberger needle (specific acupuncture effect). Hyperactivation of the insula ipsilateral to the intervention – not found on the other two interventions

  17. Painful stimulus Area of activation in the contralateral insula

  18. A B Real & Streitberger vs Overt placebo (Expectation) A – Rostral part of anterior cingulate cortex & midbrain periaqueductal gray; B - dorsolateral prefrontal cortex are both activated over and above OP. They are part of the expectation/reward system

  19. Interpretation • Acupuncture has a specific physiological effect – not linked to pain/ sensation of the procedure • Expectation has a mediating effect on the physiological response to a physical stimulus • Streitberger needle is fundamentally different from RA and might be an inert control (or at least a physiologically less effective treatment). It only affected sensory areas

  20. The next phase? • Further investigation of the physiological effect of skin prick – is it inert?

More Related