1 / 10

Dose-Toxicity Study of Oral Prednisone in Ocular Myasthenia

Dose-Toxicity Study of Oral Prednisone in Ocular Myasthenia. Michael Benatar, Mike McDermott, Gil Wolfe and Don Sanders. Background. Goals of therapy Restore clear state of vision Reduce the risk of progression to GMG Absence of data

floria
Download Presentation

Dose-Toxicity Study of Oral Prednisone in Ocular Myasthenia

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Dose-Toxicity Study of Oral Prednisone in Ocular Myasthenia • Michael Benatar, Mike McDermott, • Gil Wolfe and Don Sanders

  2. Background • Goals of therapy • Restore clear state of vision • Reduce the risk of progression to GMG • Absence of data • Evidence Report: Medical Treatment of Ocular Myasthenia (Neurology 2007 68:2144-2149) • Treatment of Ocular Myasthenia (Neurology, 2008, in press) • Clinical equipoise • Need to balance potential efficacy against potential for steroid side effects

  3. The Controversy • Do the benefits of steroids outweigh the risk of steroid therapy? • Do ocular symptoms impair QoL or cause functional limitations? • How effective is pyridostigmine? • How effective are steroids? • How frequent/severe are steroid side effects?

  4. Study Design • Enroll patients with newly diagnosed OM • Treat with pyridostigmine x 1 month • Randomize those whose symptoms fail to remit to one of two steroid dosing strategies • Aggressive prophylaxis and treatment of steroid side effects • Steroid treatment x 6 months • Titrate steroid dosage against symptoms • Quantify impact of symptoms & Rx on QoL

  5. Specific Aims • To select a tolerable steroid dosing strategy for an efficacy study • To demonstrate the adverse impact of ocular symptoms on QoL • To validate the ocular-QMG as an outcome measure • To estimate the proportion of subjects whose ocular symptoms remit

  6. Inclusion Criteria • Weakness confined to extra-ocular muscles, levator or eye closure • At least one abnormal diagnostic test • Inadequate prior pyridostigmine treatment (dose not titrated to efficacy or intolorability) • Age > 18; male or female • Identifiable internist (to manage steroid AEs)

  7. Exclusion Criteria • Steroid treatment (> 10mg/day x 30 days) • Current immune suppression • Prior thymectomy • Contra-indication to steroids (e.g. poorly controlled diabetes, HTN, glaucoma)

  8. Outcome Measures • Primary • Ability to remain on prednisone for study duration without the occurrence of an adverse event that does not resolve with appropriate therapy or dosage reduction • Secondary • Quality of Life - INQoL • Ocular-QMG- reliability & validity • Subjective global impression of change • Time to MM & to ocular-QMG score of 0

  9. Relevance to Efficacy Study • Selection of tolerable prednisone dosing strategy • Demonstration of impact of ocular symptoms and treatment on QoL • Validation of ocular-QMG as outcome measure • Enrollment/recruitment feasibility

  10. Discussion • Is the problem at important one? • Is prednisone the best therapeutic choice? • Is it worth studying two prednisone dosages? • Phase II → III versus phase II/III • Collaborative opportunities • Collect QoL data • Subject eligibility & willingness

More Related