Patent litigation remedies some statistical observations l.jpg
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 31

PATENT LITIGATION REMEDIES: SOME STATISTICAL OBSERVATIONS PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 196 Views
  • Updated On :
  • Presentation posted in: Shopping

PATENT LITIGATION REMEDIES: SOME STATISTICAL OBSERVATIONS. PROF. PAUL JANICKE UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON LAW CENTER. 2005 PATENT DISPOSITIONS [2,231]. 2006 PATENT DISPOSITIONS [2,416]. DISPOSITION MODES FOR OTHER KINDS OF CASES -- 2004. HOW DISPOSITION MODES CHANGED OVER TIME.

Related searches for PATENT LITIGATION REMEDIES: SOME STATISTICAL OBSERVATIONS

Download Presentation

PATENT LITIGATION REMEDIES: SOME STATISTICAL OBSERVATIONS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Patent litigation remedies some statistical observations l.jpg

PATENT LITIGATION REMEDIES: SOME STATISTICAL OBSERVATIONS

PROF. PAUL JANICKE

UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON LAW CENTER


2005 patent dispositions 2 231 l.jpg

2005 PATENT DISPOSITIONS [2,231]


2006 patent dispositions 2 416 l.jpg

2006 PATENT DISPOSITIONS [2,416]


Disposition modes for other kinds of cases 2004 l.jpg

DISPOSITION MODES FOR OTHER KINDS OF CASES -- 2004


How disposition modes changed over time l.jpg

HOW DISPOSITION MODES CHANGED OVER TIME


Number of cases brought l.jpg

NUMBER OF CASES BROUGHT

  • PEAKED AT 3,075 IN FY2004

  • DIPPED TO 2,720 IN2005

  • 2,830 IN 2006

    * SOURCE: ADMIN. OFFC. of U.S. COURTS ANNUAL RPTS.


Fy2006 busiest patent districts l.jpg

FY2006 BUSIEST PATENT DISTRICTS:


Cost of getting to judgment l.jpg

COST OF GETTING TO JUDGMENT

  • COUNSEL FEES and RELATED COSTS PER AIPLA 2005 SURVEY:

    • $4,500,000 [NATIONWIDE MEDIAN, CASES INVOLVING >$25M]

    • REALITY: PROBABLY VALID FOR “REGULAR” CLIENTS AND HOURLY BILLING

    • REALITY: CONTINGENCY AND SMALL TROLL REPRESENTATIONS PROBABLY MUCH LOWER


Slide9 l.jpg

  • DISRUPTION COSTS OF LITIGATION ARE HIGH FOR LARGE ENTITIES

  • TIME TO JUDGMENT IS IMPORTANT

    • BIG COS. FEEL PRESSURED TO SETTLE EARLY


What are the jury verdicts l.jpg

WHAT ARE THE JURY VERDICTS?

  • NOT SO HIGH

    • PRESS CAPTURES ONLY THE HIGH-NUMBER VERDICTS

  • IN 2005-2006, VERDICTS WERE MODEST VIS-A-VIS PRESS COVERAGE IMPRESSIONS

    SOURCE: COURT DOCKET SHEETS


Patent verdicts 2005 2006 l.jpg

PATENT VERDICTS – 2005-2006


Patent verdicts 2005 200612 l.jpg

PATENT VERDICTS – 2005-2006


Patent verdicts 2005 200613 l.jpg

PATENT VERDICTS – 2005-2006


Patent verdicts 2005 200614 l.jpg

PATENT VERDICTS – 2005-2006


Patent verdicts 2005 200615 l.jpg

PATENT VERDICTS – 2005-2006


Patent verdicts 2005 200616 l.jpg

PATENT VERDICTS – 2005-2006


Patent verdicts 2005 200617 l.jpg

PATENT VERDICTS – 2005-2006


Median winning verdict l.jpg

MEDIAN WINNING VERDICT

  • $4,167,936

  • ONLY VERDICTS ARE VIEWED HERE

  • FINAL JUDGMENT CAN BE HIGHER DUE TO INTEREST AND POSSIBLE ENHANCEMENT; OR LOWER DUE TO REMITTITUR OR JMOL

  • IF THE 2007 VERDICT IN LUCENT v. MICROSOFT STANDS ($1.5B), THE MEDIAN WILL BE NUDGED UP


By districts l.jpg

BY DISTRICTS

  • LOOKING AT SOME HIGH-VOLUME DISTRICTS FOR 2005-06:


Grouped by district l.jpg

GROUPED BY DISTRICT


Grouped by district21 l.jpg

GROUPED BY DISTRICT


Grouped by district22 l.jpg

GROUPED BY DISTRICT


Grouped by district23 l.jpg

GROUPED BY DISTRICT


How long does it take l.jpg

HOW LONG DOES IT TAKE?

  • TIME FROM FILING TO JUDGMENT IN THE DISTRICT COURT

    • FOR SETTLED CASES: SEE THE NEXT SLIDE

    • FOR ADJUDICATED CASES: SEE THE SLIDE FOLLOWING IT

      SOURCE: FROM DISPOSITION INFORMATION CONTAINED IN FED. JUDICIAL CENTER, INTEGRATED DATABASE 2006


Duration of settled cases fy06 l.jpg

Duration of Settled Cases – FY06


Duration of non settled cases fy06 l.jpg

Duration of Non-Settled Cases – FY06


Comments l.jpg

COMMENTS

  • MOST SETTLEMENTS COME EARLY

  • FOR NON-SETTLED CASES:

    • THE EARLY YELLOW BAR IS MAINLY DEFAULTS

    • DARK GREEN BARS ARE MAINLY SUMMARY JUDGMENTS

    • LIGHT GREEN BARS ARE TRIALS

    • BRIGHT GREEN BAR AT RIGHT IS A MIX OF LATE DISPOSITIONS


Impact of ebay on permanent injunctions l.jpg

IMPACT OF eBAY ON PERMANENT INJUNCTIONS

  • SOME

  • RATE OF DENIAL PRE-eBAY WAS 16%

  • NOW IT IS ABOUT 25%

    SOURCES: LEXIS AND WESTLAW RESEARCH; DOCKET SHEETS


Appellate post ebay rulings on permanent injunction l.jpg

APPELLATE POST- eBAY RULINGS ON PERMANENT INJUNCTION


Post ebay district court rulings on permanent injunction l.jpg

POST-eBAY DISTRICT COURT RULINGS ON PERMANENT INJUNCTION


Courts have not yet fully analyzed the choices l.jpg

COURTS HAVE NOT YET FULLY ANALYZED THE CHOICES

  • RISKS OF REPETITIVE LITIGATION DROVE THE PRE-eBAY CASES

  • CHOICE TODAY REALLY IS:

    • DEALING WITH ANY FUTURE PROBLEMS BY CONTEMPT PROCEEDING

    • DEALING WITH ANY FUTURE PROBLEMS BY FOLLOW-ON LAWSUIT (WITH INJUNCTION NEXT TIME AROUND; TREBLE DAMAGES; ATTORNEY FEES)


  • Login