TOTAL RETURN
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 10

Total return of the Wastewater Collection and Treatment Project in Zalaegerszeg Agglomeration PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 42 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

TOTAL RETURN. „W ho foresees three days, he will get three more years. „ (a Japanese saying). Total return of the Wastewater Collection and Treatment Project in Zalaegerszeg Agglomeration Made by Csaba Rigó 2009. HYPHOTHESES. PROBLEM STATEMENT. HYPHOTHESES

Download Presentation

Total return of the Wastewater Collection and Treatment Project in Zalaegerszeg Agglomeration

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Total return of the wastewater collection and treatment project in zalaegerszeg agglomeration

TOTAL RETURN

„Who foresees three days, he will get three more years. „

(a Japanese saying)

Total return of the Wastewater Collection and

Treatment Project in Zalaegerszeg Agglomeration

Made by Csaba Rigó

2009

September 9th, 2009


Total return of the wastewater collection and treatment project in zalaegerszeg agglomeration

HYPHOTHESES

PROBLEM STATEMENT

  • HYPHOTHESES

  • The macro-environment of the project has changed, the project has to be examinebefore finishing the programme in consideration of the economies of scale.

  • Raising of Development Fund for future reconstruction should be based on reconstruction schedule!

  • Excess of residual source can cause headache and results higher tariffs.

  • Increasing tariffs influence consumption and outstanding debt.

More exciting questions:

- What's up with the investment economies of scale?

- How the total return can be ensured in the future?

- What is the optimal amount of the Development Fund?

- Do increasing tariffs influence consumption?

Source: Zalavíz Co.

Development Fund for

reconstruction

2

September 9th, 2009


Total return of the wastewater collection and treatment project in zalaegerszeg agglomeration

ANALYSIS (PESTEL)Key drivers of the changes of the macro-environment

Political dimension

Minority administration (reforms in tardiness)

Change of the tax law (VAT law, local taxes)

Planned restriction of the social supports

Economic dimension

Termination of the big users (companies of the food industry)

High interest level

Increase of the unemployment

Decrease of the disposable incomes, decrease of the spending power (PPP)

Sociocultural dimension

Decrease in the population, alteration in the lifestyle, decrease of working activity

Alteration of the consumption habits, decreasing drinking water consumption

Rise in the expenses of the public utility in the household consumption

Recession in the building operations in the surrounding districts of Zalaegerszeg and in the country

Technological dimension

Appearance of more developed technologies, alteration of the life cycle of the built-in materials and equipments

Rise in costs of energy and chemicals

Environmental dimension

CONCLUSION 1.

The macro-environment of the project has changed.

Proposed alteration of the law about water management

Changing in the fees for soil strain

Legal dimension

Changing of the local regulations about the public utility connections (rise in the fees of connecting-up)

3

September 9th, 2009


Total return of the wastewater collection and treatment project in zalaegerszeg agglomeration

ANALYSIS The position of the project determined by CBA in economies of scale matrix

The calculation method may

differ in each town however!

CONCLUSION 2.

The original CBA

says the project is

just economies of

scale. BUT!

It might become

easily deadlock or

question mark.

It has already included

the extra running costs

of the 1st stage and the

70 % of the depreciation.

4

September 9th, 2009


Total return of the wastewater collection and treatment project in zalaegerszeg agglomeration

ANALYSIS The depreciation built in the pubic utility charges Proposed reconstruction plan

Joint decree no. 14/2004 (VIII. 13.) of TNM-GKM-FMM-FVM-PM 39/A. § (9)

Accountancy

Model A

(„24 years duration”)

Less reconstruction

demand based on

vendors’expertise and

operator’s experience.

5

September 9th, 2009


Total return of the wastewater collection and treatment project in zalaegerszeg agglomeration

ANALYSIS 3 accountancy models as the alternative of the project’s total return

  • CONCLUSION 3.

  • There is residual source in both of Model A, B and C.

  • Model A or B results excessive residual source, that raises tariffs more.

  • Raising of Development Fund should onlybe based on reconstruction schedule!

1x

In Model C („50 years”) reconstruction is ensurable with less residual source!

Model B („35 years”) gives still excessive residual source!

Model A („24 years”) results the excessive residual source!

2x

5x

CONCLUSION 4.

Model A is a financial approach rather than a sustainable solution.

Model B and C is more sustainable in social respect.

Calculated depreciation is near 348 million HUF/year on the long run in Model B.

Calculated depreciation is near 514 million HUF/year on the long run in Model A.

Calculated depreciation is 244 million HUF/year on the long run in Model C.

6

September 9th, 2009


Total return of the wastewater collection and treatment project in zalaegerszeg agglomeration

ANALYSIS

How does relate tariff and outstanding debt?

Why is the total return in social respect important?

But what is the situation in country of the agglomeration?

Because consumption is shrinking. Consumption of Zalaegerszeg significantly influences

the average consumption of the agglomeration.

CONCLUSION 6.

Increase of tariffs is one of the reasons has influenced outstanding debt for 5 years.

BUT! Outstanding debt is bear by liquidation of food industry firms also.

The drinking water tariff is raising more intensive

below 190 litre/day/capita consumption.

CONCLUSION 6.

Increasing tariffs influence consumption.

It has been justified for 5 years.

Beside the drinking water tariff, the wastewater

tariff is implemented also in 2001. It did not cause

a notable decline in consumption.

7

September 9th, 2009


Total return of the wastewater collection and treatment project in zalaegerszeg agglomeration

ANALYSIS

Development source built in tariff

The position of the project to be expected

CONCLUSION 7.

The project might

easily become

deadlockor

question mark.

CONCLUSION 8.

Both of Model A, B and C results in enough residualvalue.

Depreciation built in tariff is more practicalthan local taxes.

8

September 9th, 2009


Total return of the wastewater collection and treatment project in zalaegerszeg agglomeration

CONCLUSION 1-8.

RECOMMENDATION BASED ON CONCLUSIONS

Model B („35 years”)

Calculated depreciation is near 348 million HUF/year

on the long run in Model B.


Total return of the wastewater collection and treatment project in zalaegerszeg agglomeration

THANK YOU!

Thank you for your kind attention!

10

September 9th, 2009


  • Login