fci technology assessment step 2 process
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
FCI Technology Assessment Step 2 Process

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 16

FCI Technology Assessment Step 2 Process - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 130 Views
  • Uploaded on

FCI Technology Assessment Step 2 Process. Jacky Pouzet, Nikos Fistas, Phil Platt AGCFG3/WGC11 18-19 September 2006, Brussels. European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation. Content. Goals of the technology assessment Results of Step 1 Step 2 process Next steps

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' FCI Technology Assessment Step 2 Process ' - fleta


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
fci technology assessment step 2 process
FCI Technology Assessment Step 2 Process

Jacky Pouzet, Nikos Fistas, Phil Platt

AGCFG3/WGC11

18-19 September 2006, Brussels

European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation

content
Content
  • Goals of the technology assessment
  • Results of Step 1
  • Step 2 process
  • Next steps
  • FAA/NASA/EUROCONTROL co-ordinated process
goal of the technology assessment
Goal of the Technology Assessment
  • Aim is to propose technology(ies) that meet the requirements for a Future Radio System by the end of March 07.
    • Based on requirements i.e. COCR v1.0
  • To achieve this requires defining a common operational environment that candidate technologies can be evaluated against. This will include –
    • Definition of the common traffic scenarios – previous presentation
    • Other issues that must be considered in ‘evaluating’ technologies
  • In Europe the Technology Assessment is being carried out in a two-step process
    • Step 1 complete
    • Step 2 underway
step 1 methodology
Step 1: Methodology

Results

of previous

assessments

QQ

MCNA

ITT

EC

FILTER

Focus on Long Term

List of Promising

Technologies

New

developments

Capacity + QoS

Step 1

Step 2

Step 2 Process

List of Considered

Technologies

step 1 list of promising technologies
Step 1: List of Promising Technologies

DRAFT

Red text = not analysed in Step 1

spectrum considerations
Spectrum Considerations

BAND

AIRSPACE

CURRENT COM TECHNOLOGY

POTENTIAL FUTURE COM TECHNOLOGY

VHF band

(including upper VOR band)

Airport/Surface, TMA, Enroute

8.33/25KHz DSB-AM, VDL2, VDL4

B-VHF, (x)DL4

L Band

(Lower part)

TMA, Enroute

1090 ES

UAT

(x)DL3, (x)DL4,

ETDMA, B-VHF,

WCDMA, P34,

C Band

Airport/Surface

B-VHF, WCDMA,

802.16

L Band – Sat

TMA, Enroute, Oceanic

AMSS SATCOM, Iridium

Swiftbroadband,

New Satellite

System(s)

step 2 overview of technology assessment process
Step 2: Overview of Technology Assessment process

Common template to describe candidate technologies

Step 1

Set of traffic scenarios

- based on COCR

Spectrum considerations

- compatibility with existing users in proposed bands

- bandwidth

Capacity and Performance

- theoretical

- simulations

- measured

Interaction

with

SESAR

-D2, D3

Recommendation for

FCI technologies

  • meeting requirements
  • -meeting deployment
  • timescale

Aircraft Integration

Other aspects for consideration

step 2 technology description
Step 2 technology description
  • All candidate technologies should be defined in a common format including
    • Concept of Operation
    • Proposed band of operation
    • Spectrum issues/constraints
    • Proposed architecture
    • Measures to assure Quality of Service
    • Aircraft integration
others elements of the assessment
Others elements of the assessment
  • Standardisation
  • Transition
  • Certification
  • Redundancy
  • Capabilities (addressed, broadcast, ..)
  • Security
  • TRL (general TRL – not specific for ATM implementation)
  • Spectrum Efficiency (data throughput vs bandwidth)
  • Network Efficiency (frequency re-use, small cell size etc)
  • Preliminary cost information
overview of step 2 assessment
Overview of Step 2 Assessment

Performance Assurance

Simulations

Calculations

List of Technologies

Recommendations

Traffic Scenarios

Assessment

for the FCI

Non-performance related

aspects

Type of communication

supported

Spectrum compatibility

Aircraft integration

TRL

Transition

Scalability

Interoperability

step 2 working arrangements
Step 2 working arrangements
  • Co-operation with FAA/NASA and other European partners to obtain a common set of information
  • Engage with experts involved in technology development
    • detailed information on design choices and to obtain simulation results
  • Where no project is considering a potential candidate technology then best-efforts will be made to support the assessment
ranking of technologies
Ranking of technologies
  • Class 1 – Proven, viable, standardised technology, available for operational use.
  • Class 2 - Technology has potential to meet requirements. Standardisation process in progress, successfully demonstrated using prototypes, implementation and transition arrangements feasibly.
  • Class 3 - ‘Has potential – needs further development’
  • Class 4 - ‘Planned/conceptual – no evidence/detail of performance, cost etc’

DRAFT

ranking process
Ranking process
  • Ranking will be undertaken using a ‘mask’ against a pre-defined assessment level (being finalised)

DRAFT

next steps
Next Steps
  • Complete definition of the common evaluation method
  • Describe technologies and identify performance in a common way
  • Compare technologies using an agreed methodology
  • Provide recommendations on the FCI technology (-ies)
  • Timeframe: to complete Step 2 by mid 2007
eurocontrol faa nasa co ordinated activities
EUROCONTROL/FAA/NASA co-ordinated activities

Recommendations

for FCI

technology (-ies)

FAA/NASA

List of

candidate

technologies

Phase 2 - refinement of

Phase 1

criteria and further

Initial Pre-

Phase 3 Assessment

investigation of

screening

technology

COCR v1.0

COCR v2.0

Initial Pre-

Step 1 Assessment

Step 2 Assessment

screening

List of

candidate

technologies

EUROCONTROL

ad