1 / 26

Rethinking Assessment and Feedback Professor David Nicol Centre for Academic Practice

Rethinking Assessment and Feedback Professor David Nicol Centre for Academic Practice University of Strathclyde d.j.nicol@strath.ac.uk University of Glasgow, March 2008.

flann
Download Presentation

Rethinking Assessment and Feedback Professor David Nicol Centre for Academic Practice

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Rethinking Assessment and Feedback Professor David Nicol Centre for Academic Practice University of Strathclyde d.j.nicol@strath.ac.uk University of Glasgow, March 2008

  2. Nationally only 55% of students think feedback is prompt and had helped to clarify things they did not understand [Scotland: 48%] • Nationally only 63% of students agree that have received detailed comments on their work [Scotland: 49%]

  3. The background Concepts and ideas Framework and 12 assessment and feedback principles Recommendations for implementation Case studies of practice from the University of Glasgow This presentation

  4. Research: HE Academy 2004: Literature review: 7 principles of good assessment and feedback practice in relation to development of learner self-regulation (Nicol and Macfarlane-Dick, 2004: 2006) Local Implementations: Scottish Funding Council 2005-7: The Reengineering Assessment Practices (REAP) project (£1m) www.reap.ac.uk Policy and strategy: University of Strathclyde Assessment Policy and Practice Guidelines Synthesis: QAA Scotland 2007-8: First Year Experience: Assessment and Feedback publication Background

  5. Scottish Funding Council (£!m) Strathclyde, Glasgow University, Glasgow Caledonian Business School Large 1st year classes (160-900 students) A range of disciplines (19 modules ~6000 students) Many technologies Learning quality and teaching efficiencies Assessment for learner self-regulation Re-engineering Assessment Practices REAP project

  6. What is important in the first year? Coping with transition Understanding what is required Engagement with academic programmes Receiving support and feedback Experiences of success Feeling in control of own learning Belief that you can succeed A sense of belonging within the academic and social culture Based on research by Yorke (UK) and Tinto (US) First Year: The academic experience

  7. EMPOWERMENT/ SELF-REGULATION ACADEMIC EXPERIENCE SOCIAL EXPERIENCE ENGAGEMENT Figure 1: Framework for the analysis of assessment and feedback practices

  8. 1. Consider self and peers as much as the teacher as sourcesof assessment and feedback Tap into different qualities than teacher can provide Saves time Provides considerable learning benefits (lifelong learning) Rethinking assessment and feedback • 2. Focus on every step of the cycle • Understanding the task criteria (Sadler, 1983) • Applying what was learned in action • 3. Not just written feedback • Also oral, computer, vicarious, formal and informal

  9. Black, Harrison, Lee, Marshall and Wiliam (2005) As well as assessing and marking (through discussion and clear guidance) their own work they also assess and mark the work of others. This they do in a very mature and sensible way.…. The students know that homework will be checked by themselves or another girl in the class at the start of the next lesson…. They take pride in clear and well presented work that one of their peers may be asked to mark. Any disagreement about the answer is thoroughly and openly discussed until agreement is reached. Alice, Teacher at Waterford School, UK

  10. 12 Principles • of Good Assessment and Feedback • Practice

  11. Good formative assessment and feedback practices should: • Help clarify what good performance is (goals, criteria, standards) • Encourage ‘time an effort’ on challenging learning tasks • Deliver high quality feedback information that helps learners self-correct • Provide opportunities to act on feedback • Ensure that summative assessment supports formative learning processes • Encourage interaction and dialogue around learning (peer, teacher-student) • Facilitate the development of self-assessment and reflection in learning • Give choice in the topic, method, criteria, weighting or timing of assessments. • Involve students in decision making about assessment policy and practice • Support the development of learning groups and communities • Encourage positive motivational beliefs and self-esteem • Provide information to teachers that can be used to help shape the teaching

  12. Good formative assessment and feedback practices should: • Help clarify what good performance is (goals, criteria, standards) • Encourage ‘time an effort’ on challenging learning tasks • Deliver high quality feedback information that helps learners self-correct • Provide opportunities to act on feedback • Ensure that summative assessment supports formative learning processes • Encourage interaction and dialogue around learning (peer, teacher-student) • Facilitate the development of self-assessment and reflection in learning • Give choice in the topic, method, criteria, weighting or timing of assessments. • Involve students in decision making about assessment policy and practice • Support the development of learning groups and communities • Encourage positive motivational beliefs and self-esteem • Provide information to teachers that can be used to help shape the teaching

  13. Good formative assessment and feedback practices should: • Help clarify what good performance is (goals, criteria, standards) • Encourage ‘time an effort’ on challenging learning tasks • Deliver high quality feedback information that helps learners self-correct • Provide opportunities to act on feedback • Ensure that summative assessment supports formative learning processes • Encourage interaction and dialogue around learning (peer, teacher-student) • Facilitate the development of self-assessment and reflection in learning • Give choice in the topic, method, criteria, weighting or timing of assessments. • Involve students in decision making about assessment policy and practice • Support the development of learning groups and communities • Encourage positive motivational beliefs and self-esteem • Provide information to teachers that can be used to help shape the teaching

  14. Good formative assessment and feedback practices should: • Help clarify what good performance is (goals, criteria, standards) • Encourage ‘time an effort’ on challenging learning tasks • Deliver high quality feedback information that helps learners self-correct • Provide opportunities to act on feedback • Ensure that summative assessment supports formative learning processes • Encourage interaction and dialogue around learning (peer, teacher-student) • Facilitate the development of self-assessment and reflection in learning • Give choice in the topic, method, criteria, weighting or timing of assessments. • Involve students in decision making about assessment policy and practice • Support the development of learning groups and communities • Encourage positive motivational beliefs and self-esteem • Provide information to teachers that can be used to help shape the teaching

  15. Good formative assessment and feedback practices should: • Help clarify what good performance is (goals, criteria, standards) • Encourage ‘time an effort’ on challenging learning tasks • Deliver high quality feedback information that helps learners self-correct • Provide opportunities to act on feedback • Ensure that summative assessment supports formative learning processes • Encourage interaction and dialogue around learning (peer, teacher-student) • Facilitate the development of self-assessment and reflection in learning • Give choice in the topic, method, criteria, weighting or timing of assessments. • Involve students in decision making about assessment policy and practice • Support the development of learning groups and communities • Encourage positive motivational beliefs and self-esteem • Provide information to teachers that can be used to help shape the teaching

  16. Dynamics of Implementation

  17. EMPOWERMENT/ SELF-REGULATION • Students create criteria • Students add own criteria • Students identify criteria from samples of work • Exemplars of different performance levels provided • Students rephrase criteria in own words • Provide document with criteria ACADEMIC EXPERIENCE SOCIAL EXPERIENCE ENGAGEMENT Principle 1: Clarify what good performance is

  18. EMPOWERMENT/ SELF-REGULATION ACADEMIC EXPERIENCE SOCIAL EXPERIENCE 2. Encourage time & effort on challenging learning tasks 6.Encourage interaction and dialogue around learning (peer and teacher-student) + ENGAGEMENT

  19. EMPOWERMENT/ SELF-REGULATION ACADEMIC EXPERIENCE SOCIAL EXPERIENCE 3.Deliver individual written feedback on students’ work 6.Encourage group discussion of how that feedback might be used in tutorials + ENGAGEMENT

  20. EMPOWERMENT/ SELF-REGULATION Students create MCQs and feedback for wrong and right answers 6. Encourage interaction and dialogue around learning (peer and teacher-student) Students self-assess using MCQ and provide confidence ratings ACADEMIC EXPERIENCE + SOCIAL EXPERIENCE Students self-assess own performance using MCQs ENGAGEMENT Principle 7 Principle 6

  21. MCQ and Confidence-Based Marking Ref: Tony Gardner-Medwin (2006), Confidence-based marking: towards deeper learning and better exams. Degree of certainty C=3 High C=1 Low C=2 Medium 1 2 3 Mark if correct 0 - 2 - 6 Penalty if wrong Scoring regime for confidence-based marking

  22. A single principle or many Active involvement of students Tight-loose – maintain fidelity to the principles (tight) but encourage disciplines develop their own techniques of implementation (loose) Clarify students’ responsibilities Guidelines for Implementation

  23. Alternate solo and group work Consider programme coherence Use the principles as quality enhancement tool Share your learning designs Evaluate changes (process indicators) And where ICT can add value Guidelines for Implementation

  24. Transforming assessment and feedback: Enhancing integration and empowerment (published by QAA Scotland) Recommendations: how to implement at module, course and institutional level A Literature review: how assessment and feedback can support empowerment and integration 12 principles of assessment and feedback practice (+ questions to enhance quality) 100+ examplesand case studies illustrating implementation across the disciplines www.reap.ac.uk/resourceswww.enhancementthemes.ac.uk/themes/FirstYear

  25. Rethinking Assessment and Feedback Questions

  26. Nicol, D (2008), Transforming assessment and feedback: Enhancing integration and empowerment in the first year, to be published by Quality Assurance Agency, Scotland (June) Nicol, D (in press), Assessment for learner self-regulation: Enhancing achievement in the first year using learning technologies, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, Nicol, D (2007), Laying the foundation for lifelong learning: cases studies of technology supported assessment processes in large first year classes, British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(4), 668-678 Nicol, D (2007) E-assessment by design: using multiple-choice tests to good effect, Journal of Further and Higher Education.31(1), 53-64. Nicol, D. & Milligan, C. (2006), Rethinking technology-supported assessment in relation to the seven principles of good feedback practice. In C. Bryan and K. Clegg, Innovations in Assessment, Routledge. Nicol, D, J. & Macfarlane-Dick (2006), Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice, Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218. See also www.reap.ac.uk My Publications

More Related