1 / 10

Gasoline Spray (Spray G) Topic 3.5 Internal flow modeling Ron Grover (GM)

Spray G – Internal Flow Modeling. Gasoline Spray (Spray G) Topic 3.5 Internal flow modeling Ron Grover (GM) . Overview. Research Questions Can we actually get results? What is a representative discharge coefficient injector ? What is the flow field exiting the injector?

fisseha
Download Presentation

Gasoline Spray (Spray G) Topic 3.5 Internal flow modeling Ron Grover (GM)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Spray G – Internal Flow Modeling Gasoline Spray (Spray G) Topic 3.5Internal flow modeling Ron Grover (GM)

  2. Overview Research Questions • Can we actually get results? • What is a representative discharge coefficient injector? • What is the flow field exiting the injector? • What is the deviation in mass flow per hole? Outline • Model setup and assumptions • Mass flow calculations • Nozzle exit velocity field • Summary and discussion

  3. Spray G – Model Setup • Fluid Solver HRMFoam (c/o UMass) • Turbulence k-epsilon • Assumptions Submerged Fluid, Incompressible, Isenthalpic • Meshing 414,000 cells • Mesh Topology Polyhedral (STAR-CCM+) 2 layer extrusion on wall • Needle Motion None. Fixed maximum lift 45 µm Nozzle cell size ~ 20-30 µm L/D ~ 1 (nozzle) L/D ~ 1.2 (c-bore) Cell size ~ 30 – 65 µm

  4. Spray G – Run to Steady State Predicted CD ~ 0.50 Cv ~ 0.73 CA~ 0.69 GM Measurement CD~ 0.52

  5. Spray G – Internal Flow Results

  6. Spray G – Velocity Cut Planes Nozzle Hole Exit Counterbore Exit Time=2.8ms

  7. Discharge Coefficient Per Hole 2 3 1 8 4 5 7 6 Time=2.8ms

  8. Discharge Coefficient Per Hole 2 3 1 8 4 5 7 6 Time=2.8ms

  9. Summary & Discussion Points Initial Findings • CFD calculations show that deficit in discharge coefficient is equally attributed to both a velocity and area deficit • The velocity distribution per hole is biased towards the side of the hole closest to the injector axis • An instantaneous snapshot of discharge coefficient per hole shows variation; a finding that requires further investigation Call for Additional Contributions! • Solicit various modeling approaches (1-fluid, 2-component, etc. ) • Increased mesh resolution • Effect of plenum size • Needle motion effects • Internal-to-external nozzle flow coupling

  10. Thank-You

More Related