Spray G – Internal Flow Modeling
Download
1 / 10

Gasoline Spray (Spray G) Topic 3.5 Internal flow modeling Ron Grover (GM) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 112 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Spray G – Internal Flow Modeling. Gasoline Spray (Spray G) Topic 3.5 Internal flow modeling Ron Grover (GM) . Overview. Research Questions Can we actually get results? What is a representative discharge coefficient injector ? What is the flow field exiting the injector?

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha

Download Presentation

Gasoline Spray (Spray G) Topic 3.5 Internal flow modeling Ron Grover (GM)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Spray G – Internal Flow Modeling

Gasoline Spray (Spray G)

Topic 3.5Internal flow modeling

Ron Grover (GM)


Overview

Research Questions

  • Can we actually get results?

  • What is a representative discharge coefficient injector?

  • What is the flow field exiting the injector?

  • What is the deviation in mass flow per hole?

Outline

  • Model setup and assumptions

  • Mass flow calculations

  • Nozzle exit velocity field

  • Summary and discussion


Spray G – Model Setup

  • Fluid SolverHRMFoam (c/o UMass)

  • Turbulencek-epsilon

  • AssumptionsSubmerged Fluid, Incompressible, Isenthalpic

  • Meshing414,000 cells

  • Mesh TopologyPolyhedral (STAR-CCM+)

    2 layer extrusion on wall

  • Needle MotionNone. Fixed maximum lift 45 µm

Nozzle cell size ~ 20-30 µm

L/D ~ 1 (nozzle)

L/D ~ 1.2

(c-bore)

Cell size ~ 30 – 65 µm


Spray G – Run to Steady State

Predicted CD ~ 0.50

Cv ~ 0.73

CA~ 0.69

GM Measurement CD~ 0.52


Spray G – Internal Flow Results


Spray G – Velocity Cut Planes

Nozzle Hole Exit

Counterbore Exit

Time=2.8ms


Discharge Coefficient Per Hole

2

3

1

8

4

5

7

6

Time=2.8ms


Discharge Coefficient Per Hole

2

3

1

8

4

5

7

6

Time=2.8ms


Summary & Discussion Points

Initial Findings

  • CFD calculations show that deficit in discharge coefficient is equally attributed to both a velocity and area deficit

  • The velocity distribution per hole is biased towards the side of the hole closest to the injector axis

  • An instantaneous snapshot of discharge coefficient per hole shows variation; a finding that requires further investigation

    Call for Additional Contributions!

  • Solicit various modeling approaches (1-fluid, 2-component, etc. )

  • Increased mesh resolution

  • Effect of plenum size

  • Needle motion effects

  • Internal-to-external nozzle flow coupling


Thank-You


ad
  • Login