1 / 14

Organisational structure in participatory media

Organisational structure in participatory media. MA in communications and cultural studies, 2001 Andrew Ó Baoill. Basic principles. AMARC Charter:

fionnuala
Download Presentation

Organisational structure in participatory media

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Organisational structure in participatory media MA in communications and cultural studies, 2001 Andrew Ó Baoill

  2. Basic principles • AMARC Charter: • Community Radio Stations “Operate management … practices which oppose discrimination and which are open and accountable to all supporters, staff and volunteers” • How are we to measure the extent to which a station meets this commitment, specifically with regard to volunteers?

  3. Habermas’ lifeworld- systems perspective Personality Culture Economic System Administrative System Society

  4. The paradox of rationality • Through Enlightenment, we move from norms to rational norms • Increased rationality can lead to colonisation by systems • We then move from rational norms to rules

  5. The project • Describe and critique the L-S perspective • Develop a practical model appropriate to community radio • Compare with the actual situation in Flirt FM • Does the model apply? • How does Flirt FM meet the ideal?

  6. The case study • Flirt FM: • Galway’s Student Radio Station • “Radio by Students for Students” • Broadcasts for 35 hours per week • Started in September 1995 • 1 Paid Employee (Station Manager) • Approximately 60-65 active volunteers • Station Manager reports to Board of Directors

  7. Flirt FM’s structure Volunteers / programme teams Station Manager Board of directors College campus radio ltd. Board of management

  8. Field Work Questionnaire Distributed by Keith 50 returned, of 62 names Questionnaire Analysis Interviews Seminar/Workshop Structural Analysis Existence of spaces Volunteer Morale Fair access for all Rationality of Knowledge Solidarity of members System restrictions The case study

  9. Results - existence of spaces • The Board of Management is not currently active • There is no forum for communication or consultation with volunteers • Volunteers feel they receive little information on issues such as station accommodation and schedule changes

  10. Results - volunteer morale • Volunteers are happy to be involved • 70% plan to be involved next year • 92% answered 6 or 7 to “I enjoy being involved” • 74% of students agree that they feel part of the station. 8% disagree. • Many volunteers value the informality of the station • Some say the lack of input into decisions damages their morale

  11. Results - fair access for all • Very few GMIT students are involved • Distance - especially in wet weather? • Different social interests? • 38% of volunteers are female, although 60% of NUI, Galway students are female • Socialisation of gender roles? • 70% of volunteers say their home residence is in Galway city or county

  12. Results - rationality of knowledge • Volunteers have a confused knowledge of the station structure • Station difficulties are blamed on a vague ‘them’ • ‘The Watershed’ • There is little training, other than introductory training in studio use and media law

  13. Results - solidarity of members • There are few opportunities for volunteers to meet each other and/or interact • Newer volunteers are less likely to feel part of the station • Only 75% of those who joined in the last 2 years, as opposed to all of those who joined in 1997 or earlier • One volunteer wrote that they had never been asked to train new volunteers

  14. Results - system restrictions • Many people mentioned IRTC/licence rules as preventing changes in the station • The current scheduling method, with individual slots for each volunteer, was seen by many as being the only possible means of arranging the schedule • ‘The Watershed’ • Further involvement = committee membership

More Related