1 / 2

Fluid phases

Fluid phases. Area A, hydrophobic thickness 2D C , and bending modulus K C for fully hydrated fluid (L a ) lipid bilayers (5/2011). Lipid T ( o C) D HH (Å) A (Å 2 ) 2D C (Å) K C /kT

fionan
Download Presentation

Fluid phases

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Fluid phases Area A, hydrophobic thickness 2DC, and bending modulus KC for fully hydratedfluid (La) lipid bilayers (5/2011) Lipid T (oC)DHH (Å) A (Å2) 2DC(Å) KC/kT DPPC 50 38.0d 62.9(±1.3)a,64.0b,64.3c,63.1d* 29.2a,28.5b,27.9c,28.4d* 15.0**-e DHPC 48 38.2e 65.1e 27.6e 9.4e DLPE 35 35.6b 51.2b 25.8b - DMPC 30 35.3g 59.7f,60.6g 26.2f,25.4g 15.8**-g DLPC 30 30.8g63.2g20.9g 13.2g DOPC 30 36.7d 72.2h,72.5b,72.1i,72.4j,k,67.4d*27.2h,27.1b, 27.2i,26.8j,k,28.8d*18.2** to be rescaled(15) 37.6k 69.1k 27.7k 20.3k T trends correct(45) 36.1k 75.5k 26.2k 17.2k DOPS 30 38.4l65.3l30.2l - EggPC 30 35.4f69.4f,b 27.2f,27.1b - POPC 30 37.0j68.3(±1.5)j27.1j 20.3j SOPC 30 39.1m 67.0(±0.9)m 29.2(±0.4)m 21.5m diC22:1PC 30 44.4j 69.3j 34.4j 30.4j 18:0-22:5PC 24 37.9n68.7n30.5n 25.6** 18:0-22:6PC 24 37.9n68.2n30.5n 18.9** DiphytanoylPC 30 36.4r 80.5(±1.5)r 27.2r 12.4r Typical uncertainties 0.1 0.1 0.5-1.0 0.3-0.5 0.5-1.0 The most robust thickness from X-ray is the head-head thickness DHH. Numbers for 2DC and A are being critically reviewed and updated. In particular, it is now clear from ref d thatfor DOPC thesmallest value of A and the largest value of 2DC are the ones in agreement with neutron scattering; other temperatures should be rescaled. Similar reanalysis for DPPC did not make such a large difference, but other lipids have not yet been similarly reanalyzed. The product of A and 2DC is more robust than either alone. aBiophys.J. 70:1419(1996); bBiochim.Biophys.Acta: Reviews on Biomembranes 1469:159(2000); cBiophys.J.:Biophys.Lett 90:L83(2006); dBiophys.J. 95:2356(2008); eChem.Phys.Lipids 160:33(2009); fChem.Phys.Lipids 95:83(1998); gBiophys.J. 88:2626(2005); hBiophys.J. 75:917(1998); iPhys.Rev.E 69:040901(2004); jJ.Membr.Biol. 208:193(2005); kBiophys.J. 94:117(2008); lBiophys.J. 86:1574(2004); mBiochim.Biophys.Acta 1178:1120(2008); nJ.Am.Chem.Soc. 125:6409(2003); oBiophys.J. 83:3324(2002); pBiophys.J. 64:1097(1993); qBiophys.J. 71:885(1996); rChem.Phys.Lipids 163:630(2009).*Neutron data; **Upon reanalysis(2009) See next page for older gel phase results

  2. Gel phases Fully hydrated gel phase lipid bilayer areas and hydrophobic thicknesses (9/2010) Lipid T(oC) A(Å2) 2DC (Å) DMPC 10 47.2o 30.3(±0.2)o DiC16PC,18,20,22,24 20 47.5p,q 34.4b,37.1q,40.7q,44.0q,48.0q DMPS 20 40.8l 36.0l DLPE 20 41.0b30.0b DHPC-Interdig. 20 77.2e 20.3e DHPC-gel 20 46.9e 34.6e aBiophys.J. 70:1419(1996); bBiochim.Biophys.Acta: Reviews on Biomembranes 1469:159(2000); cBiophys.J.:Biophys.Lett 90:L83(2006); dBiophys.J. 95:2356(2008); eChem.Phys.Lipids 160:33(2009); fChem.Phys.Lipids 95:83(1998); gBiophys.J. 88:2626(2005); hBiophys.J. 75:917(1998); iPhys.Rev.E 69:040901(2004); jJ.Membr.Biol. 208:193(2005); kBiophys.J. 94:117(2008); lBiophys.J. 86:1574(2004); mBiochim.Biophys.Acta 1178:1120(2008); nJ.Am.Chem.Soc. 125:6409(2003); oBiophys.J. 83:3324(2002); pBiophys.J. 64:1097(1993); qBiophys.J. 71:885(1996); rChem.Phys.Lipids 163:630(2009).

More Related