1 / 20

Forschungsmethoden der Psychologie

Forschungsmethoden der Psychologie. Tutorium 9. Textanalyse Theorie Empirie. Übersicht. Textanalyse. Text / Material: Verschriftlichte Sprache + parasprachliches (Lachen, Hüsteln) + nichtsprachliches (Mimik, Gestik) +jede Art von Zeichen. Textinterpretation. Text. Antwort. Frage.

fiona
Download Presentation

Forschungsmethoden der Psychologie

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Forschungsmethoden der Psychologie Tutorium 9

  2. Textanalyse Theorie Empirie Übersicht

  3. Textanalyse

  4. Text / Material: Verschriftlichte Sprache + parasprachliches (Lachen, Hüsteln)+ nichtsprachliches (Mimik, Gestik) +jede Art von Zeichen Textinterpretation Text Antwort Frage neue

  5. Hermeneutischer Zirkel: Textinterpretation Externer Kontext Teil Überprüfung Interpretation Interpretation Überprüfung Ganzes Interner Kontext

  6. Textinterpretation Darstellungsfkt. Externer Kontext Ausdrucksfkt. Appellfunktion Gegenstand Situation R C P Funktionen Text Interner Kontext

  7. Vorgehensweise: Textinterpretation • Interner Kontext untersuchen • Externer Kontext untersuchen • Externen Kontext prüfen

  8. Kempf, 2006, S.344

  9. Vergleich

  10. Vergleich

  11. Structural (sequental) analysis of narratives The Struggle with the Angel (textual analysis of Genesis 32: 22-32 by Roland Barthes in his Image-Music-Text, 1977, 125-142) Beispiel 1

  12. Three tasks of a structural analysis: 1) The inventorization and classification of the 'psychological', biographical, characterial and social attributes of the characters involved in the narrative (age, sex, external qualities, social situation or position of importance, etc.). 2) The inventorization and classification of the functions of the characters; what they do according to their narrative status, in their capacity as subject of an action that remains constant: the Sender, the Seeker, the Emissary, etc. 3) The inventorization and classification of the actions, the plane of the verbs. These narrative actions are organized in sequences, in successions apparently ordered according to a pseudo-logical schema (it is a matter of a purely empirical, cultural logic, a product of experience - even if ancestral - and not of reasoning). Beispiel 1

  13. Metonymic logic is that of the unconscious. Hence it is perhaps in that direction that one would need to pursue the present study, to pursue the reading of the text - its dissemination, not its truth. Evidently, there is a risk in so doing of weakening the episode's economico-historical force (certainly existent, at the level of the exchanges of tribes and the questions of power). Yet equally in so doing the symbolic explosion of the text (not necessarily of a religious order) is reinforced. The problem, the problem at least posed for me, is exactly to manage not to reduce the Text to a signified, whatever it may be (historical, economic, folkloristic or kerygmatic), but to hold its signifiance fully open. Barthes 1977, 141 Beispiel 1

  14. Analysis of speeches of political leaders Postoutenko, Kirill. 2010. Performance and management of political leadership in totalitarian and democratic societies in Totalitation Communication: Hierarchies, Codes and Messages, ed. Kirill Postoutenko. Bielefeld: transkript Verlag, p.91-121 Beispiel 2

  15. Primary sources: speeches of Hitler in 1935, 1938, 1941, 1942; speeches of Stalin in 1937a, 1937b, 1947, 1942, 1943; and speeches of Roosevelt in 1936a, 1936b, 1936c, 1936c, 1936d, 1936e, 1941, 1942a, 1942b, 1943. (1000 sentences for Hitler, 1022 sentences for Stalin and 1101 for Roosevelt) Research question: singular vs. Plural self-references in leader‘s texts Beispiel 2

  16. Beispiel 2 • How often do the respective leaders refer to themselves as the individual ego-centers of discursive perfomance (I, me, my) as opposed to the collective ego-centers of discursive performance (we, our, us)?

  17. Analysis of news articles Wolf, Irina. 2010. Uneasy communication in the authoritative state: the case of Hizb ut-Tahrir in Kyrgyzstan in Totalitation Communication: Hierarchies, Codes and Messages, ed. Kirill Postoutenko. Bielefeld: transkript Verlag, p.275-301 Beispiel 3

  18. QUALITATIVE Reviewing literature and reading several articles in order to construct a coding book Reading the most typical articles and describing the classes Identification of the events that made HT newsworthy Trying to answer why certain patterns were used in specific circumstances Surveying/interviewing journalists QUANTITATIVE Coding articles in accodance with the predefined variables Analysing data with LCA, simple frequencies and cross-tabulations Identification of the most typical articles representing the latent classes Identification of the time periods (months) when HT was the most newsworthy Identifying what patterns (latent classes) were used to report about these events Analysis of coverage of a certain issue in press Wolf (unpublished)

  19. Coverage of suicide bombings in Uzbekistan in 2004 in the Kyrgyz Vechernii Bishkek, British The Times and German Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. KGZ: pure propaganda of the Uzbek state GB: very emotional criticism of human rights accords in UZB, in particular towards HT members Germany: moderate criticism of poor human rights accords in UZB possible reasons: different legal statuses of HT; proximity of countries; dependence of KGZ on Uzbek‘s natural resources; form of governments; media dependence/independence; foreign policies of European states, etc. Beispiel 3

  20. Das war es für heute!

More Related